Who is the revolutionary subject in the west?

Gangs are literary business.

The zapatistas, food not bombs, revcom, co ops, occupy, blm, will never equal the bps. The state doesnt even feel threatened by these liberals.

Im white and would do anything to bring back the bp, but theres nothing i can do

As marxist theory developed it was pretty important to know who really was the rev subject of history. In marxian theory it isnt just 'anyone with a bad life' ppl like fanon, mao, fidel, kept changing who it would be

Learn self defense. What if the next revolutionary party wasn't also nationalist and was aracial?

"Those left out of the economy", because eventually that is what is going to happen to us all. Surplus population of the world, unite!

...

It's the traditional proletariat.

Every truly free and democratic society that existed came from a "commoner" class that steadily increased their economic clout until they were poised to overthrow the ruling class. (The plebeian in Rome, the Athenian citizen, the medieval burgher-artisan, the Swiss farmer, the American yeoman-farmer, and even the French syndicalist worker are all examples of this. Even France and Russia relied on artisans for the former and peasants who became yeoman-farmers as their core revolutionary forces, with both being betrayed due to not having solidified their power-base in face of an ascendant centralized state.)

The American union worker is the modern yeoman-farmer, the rightful ruler of the American commonwealth.

The lumpens only are lackeys for the establishment and are incapable of governing themselves. The precariat are a mixed bag, the younger native workers having potential to form unions and join the ranks of the proletariat. However, the immigrant precariat are literally scabs and must be removed to be replaced with proletarian workers.

(Women actually are disproportionately professional-managerial if not housewives, though the precariat is probably the second biggest sector that women are in)

The only way to eliminate capitalism is the complete take over of society by the traditional proletariat, converting the youthful white precariat into their ranks whilst eliminating the capitalist elite, professional-managerial technocrats, the precariat scabs, and the lumpens. Upon this takeover, whether gradual or sudden, the proletariat will ascend and transform into a new burgher class of cooperative-owners and the self-employed. A syndicalist, protectionist economic order based on guilds/labor unions will be established along with a direct-democratic confederation of citizens' assemblies built upon this new ruling class of citizen-soldiers.

In America's case, it will be the victory of Real America over the degenerate cosmopolitan scourge of Anti-America, establishing a republic of virtue.

Only then can there be true liberty. Oh, and fuck lolberts for appropriating the Gadsden flag.

...

aka a mix of "co-ops are totally socialism guys", petit-bourgeois radicalism and 19th-century populist LARPing.

Or, is it the other way around? The Holla Forums rhetoric being window dressing on working-class grievances but ultimately adopted by retarded autists who worship pickelhaubes.

Who could possibly have been behind this post? :^)

All joking aside, is there anything wrong with this?