In your Ideal state, can a person sue the state?
Also why was my last post anchored?
OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARATERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS
In your Ideal state, can a person sue the state?
Also why was my last post anchored?
OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARATERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS OP MUST BE 200 CHARACTERS
In my ideal state there's no state.
What he said. While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State.
That said, the socialist State that is supposed to act as a transition can and should be extremely democratic, far more than this bourgeois farce we have now. The USSR was born in just about the worst conditions possible, and centralization and authoritarianism were necessary to not only protect socialism, but keep the country in one piece. But as these things usually go, these measures became solidified as a basic part of the new State. If Lenin had survived, maybe he would have rescinded these measures, maybe not. But we know what option Stalin picked.
Well I mean the state turns into an organ which properly represents the proletariat and it's interests… so maybe you could sue the representant I mean like change it for another one kinda like a Soviet style election
For what, money? Surgery?
Freedom ain't free kid.
So can I sue that transitional state?
Mate, even the soviets paid people in a currency.
collectivism is a senseless word that exist purely to imply the other side is for "individualism".
Read a fucking book.
Why do you say collectivism is meaningless?Aren't Nazis collectivists?
I do all the time.
checked
Of course they were. Most capitalists are collectivists