>tfw even Bookshit understood that co-ops and "market socialism" are just red sticker capitalism

Doesn't matter. It logically follows that if strong enough regulations were put in place or capitalists were nice enough crisis could be averted without destroying capitalism. In Marx's crisis theory the only way to avvert a falling rate of profit crisis is to destroy capital.

Why are you comparing Wolff supporters to fascists at all?

Then why doesn't he advocate for this?

once again Wolff believes that crisis cannot be averted under capitalism and that capitalists are prevented by their economic interests from being "nice" to the workers. It doesn't matter if you think this is what logically follows when Wolff believes the exact opposite and has argued as such.

It doesn't matter what he believes. The underconsumptionist theory is a keynesian one and a crisis could feasibly be averted with a universal basic income or proggressive taxation.

So you're arguing that he should advocate capitalism?

He does, just under a thin Marxist coat of paint.

I'm not sure whether Keynes actually thought that low demand is what gets you into a recession, and not just that propping up demand could help with getting out of one.
I don't think Keynes ever proposed that. The first proposals of UBI and negative income tax did not come from Keynes followers, nor do I see much support from that group today.

Your right, its not Keynesian its social democrat economics. The point is its not Marxian.

...

Because they are comparable. Fascism did not develop out of fervent belief that rich should get all the money - or something about state/race. The movements it hijacked were semi-Socialist, and Fascism constantly tried to pretend that it is anti-Capitalist in some way. Nazies literally called themselves "National Socialist German Worker Party", referred to each other as "comrades" and had marches - that were mimicking Socialist marches.

The whole idea of Fascism was about being a "civilized", "improved" alternative to old Socialism - by removing the actual core of Socialism. And this is exactly what Wolff is about.

He does not. He is a fraud that constantly lies (which is not limited to terminology). When he uses the same words as Communists, those words have a completely different meaning. His "Socialism" is co-ops: workers of each separate co-op decide what they do by themselves, separately. His "Capitalism" is about having a boss.