Can it be called socialism if there's C-M-C?
Can it be called socialism if there's C-M-C?
Ryder Brown
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Austin Thomas
from my understanding, Cockshott proposes the elimination of money and replacement with labor currency. Also, production would be planned for human need
Owen Jenkins
^this, there's no commodity exchange in cockshott's proposal.
Jordan Jenkins
i really don't get why leftcoms hate cockshott/MLs claim him as their own.
Xavier Ward
Sure. Just no M-C-M.
Anthony Flores
If I'm correct, it has to do something with the ideas of planning. Yes, Cockshott places more emphasis on direct workers control over the MoP then the classical ML line, however, there is still the whole "planning" part. LeftComms see Communism as being the free association of producers, while ML see it more as being the scientific management of production. Leftcomms accuse ML's of being technocratic, while ML's accuse Leftcomms of misinterpreting Critique of the Gotha Program.
Isaac Bell
leftcoms fear cybernetics
Dominic Cooper
This is a meaningless phrase. If goods are "produced for use" but still pegged to a price of exchange in "labor vouchers" it isn't fucking socialism
Kayden Butler
He's utopian.
Jason Wilson
So Marx was wrong?