8,000 YEARS AGO, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man

You "lean towards cultural conservatism" because you have a shit-tier understanding of theory.

It's not propaganda, it's basic history and pretty obvious stuff going on around us. What evidence is there that Nazis made the sexual arguments in the early 20th century that they are making now?

Plus Nazis aren't the only ones making these points, there are leftists doing so too, they are just louder.

The only group that stays away from evopsych as a whole is feminism, and the reason they do it is because evopsych points out differences btw genders, that's all, that's the root of the whole thing, they don't reject evopsych because it's a soft science

everyone knows evopsych is a soft science, but at least it's based on science and not a religion like feminism


Marriages tie people down reproductively, but only if it's lifelong, has nothing to do with it being prole or bourgie.

most communists by numbers in the world lean cultural conservative. Cultural liberalism in the left is an anglo-saxon phenomena

Regular psych points out the differences, evopsych is a protoscience at best. It's completely untestable unless you can somehow conduct experiments on a macro-evolutionary timescale.

Most Communists by numbers in the world also have a shit-tier understanding of theory [not least that Communists themselves are not the active agents of revolution].

regular psych has just as good a track record as evopsych, and literally the only org opposed to evopsych is feminist orgs, it's taught in every college around the world

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_of_masculinity_under_fascist_Italy
I don't even have to search for some esoteric leftist study. It's pretty easy to see the connection between fascism and the modern ideology that is taking hold of the incel/manosphere space.
And please stop reddispacing and calling feminsts out whenever you need a boogeyman. None fucking cares about them here.

that has nothing to do with what I asked for

"'where my womenz at"'

Oh you mean to say that aut-right/incel groups/mgtow/redpillers never made arguments such as:
-women destroy civilizations. The more liberty they are given the closer societal collapse is (cue Roman empire example)
-women are biologically inferior to men
-the intrusion of women in male workplaces would disrupt the natural hierarchy of them
-women should not have constitutional rights outside those given by their men and any movement forming to give such rights to them is a dangerous disruptive force

Jeez I really wonder where manosphere rethoric comes from.