Oh absolutely. I'm not preaching nonviolence.
I'm taking more about a vision for the future.
Not wanting to lynch pedos makes me a pedo?
Oh absolutely. I'm not preaching nonviolence.
I'm taking more about a vision for the future.
Not wanting to lynch pedos makes me a pedo?
No, actually giving a shit about them enough to mention them first in your post is what gave you away. Save your indignation.
Again, that wasn't what I brought up. It's not a question of who, it's pointing out that moralizing is bullshit to start with no matter who or what you're talking about.
You didn't bring up any moral points on any of them, including against pedophiles. But there are people on here who do, despite how very much it conflicts with leftwing theory.
I don't consider 'being' something as anything related to ethics. It's just a spook, aesthetics. What I consider repugnant is violence, especially directed against me, and I will defend myself by any means available for there is nothing I value more than myself.
You just summed up liberalism.
...
And socialism is a society where these undesirables get what they "deserve"?
What do you disagree about that statement. Explain
As a slovenian
Zizek is just another yugo-nostalgic tyrant. He creates no value and wants to send everyone to gulag. Nobody likes him, he is only entertaining, nothing more
Kek, what?
Why do you believe they do deserve to suffer? Does such a thing have a point?
Is it conducive to the kind of society we'd like to see?