What's your point? You think you're going to be the ones to succeed in creating a better society through political repression when everyone who's ever said that before you has created a trash fire of a society that ended up being a worldwide pariah?
You didn't answer my question, either. What makes you think you're part of the group that knows what's best for yourselves, or anyone else?
Non totalitarian governments have also broadly run with the "you don't know what's best with you" line. It doesn't mean anything. Hitler liked dogs, it says nothing about dog owners.
Except, y'know, most first world states with particular emphasis on pre-1970s appreciation for economic interventionism. (The fucking cunts, making me wear a seatbelt rather than letting me decide as a FREE INDIVIDUAL [tm]…)
This is not a time for soundbites, but I can feel the hand of history on my shoulder.
What do you call a guy who lives on a farm and shoots any Nazis, Commies, cops, soldiers, mailmen, firemen, dogs, children, Niggers, Jews, Porkys, women or faggots who step onto his property? Is that a Libertarian? I want to know how I should describe myself
An edgy teenager.
Holy shit you are reaching levels of stupidity i have never seen.
...
Let's get dialectical about this then. If it's authoritarian to impose your will on someone else and it's authoritarian to fight it, then the only way to not be authoritarian is to either submit whenever someone is authoritarian or to be lucky and never have anyone be authoritarian in the first place. In the latter case authoritarianism is meaningless because nothing is present that could be called authoritarianism. In the former case, submission is an enabling factor of authoritarianism, which is support for authoritarianism and can be considered part of the system of authority. Thus once authority is introduced, you can either fight it (which is called authoritarian) or submit (which supports the system of authoritarianism). Thus there is nothing an opponent of authoritarianism can do. The only escape would be if the authoritarian stopped being authoritarian voluntarily, which is liberal fantasy.
He said economics
I for free markets.(Flag related)
That counts as economics
Capitalism allows the rich to stay rich and the poor to stay poor.
I want a truly free market.
Not really. Economics is the discipline dedicated to the study of the economy, not the underlying force.
...