How accurate would you say this is?

How accurate would you say this is?

I havent even looked at it and it's probably safe to assume that it was made by some tumblrina who thinks communism is some utopian egalitarian society where nothing can ever be bad, and not accurate at all

Not at all.

Not only is it confusing the DotP with Communism, it's confusing the highly malformed, heavily reactionary Soviet-style DotP as Communism.

I mean, for fuck's sake, it's defending the nuclear family.

How much clearer could Engels have been on this matter short of saying "nuclear family bad, no do pls."

Seems pretty good to me, at least for propaganda purposes.

"State" and "communism" are antithetical concepts. Communism is an anarchy. As said, you are describing a Dictatorship of the Proletariat.

obligatory

Why is it that cultural totalitarians see the word "family" and automatically assume "nuclear family"? Is it because you really just hate the concept of family in general? Stop acting like a right wing caricature.

This is yet one more of those "socialism is actually reactionary guys, praise Juche" memes churned out by Holla Forums renegades trying way too hard to fit in.

It said "classical family structure" and one of the pictures looks like a 50's-era caricature of a breadwinner pencil pusher husband and a submissive housewife.

Get your head out of your ass. Marxism-Leninism is overwhelmingly actually reactionary and you know it.

it's dishonest; the dotp in the ml model existed so as to eventually produce communism, not as a goal in and of itself

thoughts like these did make me go socdem tho

s*cially conservative

I hate these stupid fucking filters, there can't have been enough Holla Forumstards using this term to have warranted it

It wasn't for poltards, it was for illiterate tankies who kept calling themselves that

Marxists and anarchists have different definitions of "state." You could have a classless society that still has an organization with a monopoly on the use of force.

Honestly that's perfect. Fuck anrkiddies autism

I'm not an anarchist, I'm a Marxist and if you think nationalism or patriarchal families are compatible with Marxism, you haven't read Marx, Engels, OR Lenin.

Wut? They are standing side by side (as equals) and are both tending to their children. That's not a "traditional" nuclear family.

I do agree, patriotism is not nationalism tho
No where in the pic there is a mention of that

I don't know, the impression I got was that the man looked powerful and dominant and the women looked obedient. Maybe I'm wrong. In any case, it's definitely in an antiquated artistic style, which is NOT good for propaganda purposes.

It's the precursor. You seriously need to reread Lenin; he reserved some truly extraordinary rage for "social-patriots".


"Classical family structure" is a euphemism and not a particularly subtle one at that.

this one is better

You faggots need to drop the autism for one second and realize that this is aimed at libertarians and Holla Forumsacks, mainly to irritate them.

Let's see:

So if capitalism undermines all culture through consumerism and makes everyone into hyper-individualist twits, socialism is opposed to traditional culture because it's oppressive or imperialist or whatever, and fascism is actually capitalism, where the fuck are traditionalists who don't like rent or profit supposed to go?

Into the dustbin of history.

Communists are only opposed to imposing culture. It is very likely that culture under communism will strongly mirror pre-capitalist conventions (with some obvious changes of course.) Only social authoritarian """anarchists""" want to radically destroy all culture and that is only because they were beaten severely by their alcoholic step fathers for wearing their mothers dresses and shoes.

Not sure about what you mean by this. Do you believe culture would revert to pre-industrial forms following the establishment of socialism…?

It's time to stop

there goes your accuracy. literally "the reich will do this"

...

so feudalism? like best gorea?

Yeah, no

Better, but the "equal pay" thing is wrong. Waged labor is not a thing in communism.

No, its shit. It looks bad terribly one sided. Contradictions of Capitalism can be wrote in a sentence or two, they shouldn't be in tiny paragraphs. Marxism Leninism isn't Communism, states are not communist.
it's just plain bad

Trying to convert reactionaries? What a fucking waste of time? There's nothing communist about that bullshit list on the left, it's just idealized capitalism.