On this day, 99 years ago, the last Czar of Russia and his family were killed

...

Literal Jewish ritual murder.

I'm glad Stalin gave all of the old guard Bolsheviks exactly what they had coming to them. Kikes are repugnant goblins.

Support the Tzar in his noble struggle against proletarian imperialism.

What is Jewish Ritual Murder

your saying it like it was something wrong

agreed, at least fake some sort of justice.
not just shoot them

Yeah, so?

Spooks are natural and necessary for an orderly society

...

Who defines and enforces legitimacy here?

when some one from Holla Forums ejaculates into something other then a white woman

Stay mad.

The Tsar certainly wasn't legitimate as he was neither elected nor had a popular support.

The king is dead, long live the queen!

No, most certainly not.

I was just wondering what the ancap thought defined the legitimacy of the monarchy, and by extension who protected and enforced that legitimacy.

They should have tried some sort of transitional constitutional monarchy to make a more orderly transition, but given the state of Russia at the time, one can hardly blame them for doing that

Lmao, the triggered Holla Forums rejects
The fuckers had it coming

Who defined his legitimacy?You?

Nah, the only justice counterrevolutionaries and enemies of the people receive is a bullet to the head
Yeah, the bolsheviks did nothing wrong

I'm a filthy succdem, but I'd consider the British Queen or the Swedish Monarchy as "legitimate", since they don't hold power and serve to unite the nation.

The Ancap probably thought of it as "anything but gommies reee" and probably seeing something legitimate in aristocracy, given his ideology.

...

That's all fine and dandy until (you) are considered a counter-revolutionary by Daddy Stalin for the virtue of criticising the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact or doubting Lysenkoism

Are you fucking kidding me? 100 millions of innocent people were murdered and you are happy?

Property rights and laws. Not to mention that communism is incompatible with the NAP i.e. civilization

What exactly is even wrong with ideology, as long as you're not blinded by it ? I know my own is full of contradictions but it's the way I see the world.

I dont swallow baseless propaganda

There is no "the people", stop talking like a retarded populist or fascist.

I've always wondered, does misgendering violate the NAP?

...

Unironically a spook - property rights come from people deciding to enforce it, not from a magical sky fairy
Tsarist Russia had literal serfdom, how is that the rule of law ?

good thing i won't be planning to have a dictator, an all excuction will be aproved by the juidical council

Are you an enemy of the people?

Molotov-Ribbentrop don't real

That was a show trial, even Robespierre admitted as such.

got a source on that that isn't the Black Book of Gommunism?

How the fuck do you intend to establish anflapistan if you're opposed to removing the state through revolution - the same state that, in this case, was "violating the NAP" all over the fucking place simply in order to exist

and capitalism is incompatible with anarchism, so there you go really

So the Tsar and all the adults in the family, yeah, they were fair game.

The kids? Can anybody defend it on anything but practical grounds? Which I'm fine with, that makes SENSE, but you have to admit it is pretty monstrous. They could have renamed the kids, re-educated them, put them to work somewhere, whatever. Was it really necessary to just gun them down in a dingy room with their shitty royal guardians that put them in this situation?

No because all trannies and degenerates are lefties, so they must be physically removed.

Even the nazis killed less people and they showed far more respect for property

No, property rights are the foundation of freedom.

Death penalty is inherently wrong either way
Read Victor Hugo

Only 361 votes for killing Louis out of 760, which means they had barely the majority.

You can't be half a monster.

Can you stop shitting up this very important thread celebrating the death of the tsar?

I don't know, you could cut a monster in half? Especially if the monster is a tsar, which means it probably should be cut in half.

OH MAN CAPITALIST """""""ANARHCIST"""""""" HERE TO TELL US ABOUT HOW THE MONARCH WIELDING ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY WAS THE LEGITIMATE RULER WHO SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN DESPOSED HOOOOEEEE BOYS PACK IT IN WE CANT ANSWER THIS ONE

And? You gonna cry bitch-tears over Louis XVI too?

I'm not speaking about that, I'm speaking about where they come from
They come from people deciding to enforce them, nothing more

This is unironically why Death Penalty is inherently wrong.

I will restore the truth whether your Jewish CNN masters like it or not

Anarchism isn't about anti-hierarchy, it's about freedom and property. Statist fake anarchists like you should be gassed

Louis brought this on himself by fleeing at Varennes and literally conspiring against the newborn Republic
Even then, I think stripping him of his titles and making him work a normal job would have been better - kind of how the Chinese dealt with their last Emperor

...

Can you be one halve monster and one halve civil, can you keep your banality?

You can only have freedom in capitalism, communism is pure slavery. Look at Venezuela and North Korea. Sweden is getting overran by socialist nigger subhumans(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

It is a good day, looking forward to next year

...

Not sure if bait or autism

my sides holy shit.

...

Slavery, feudalism and capitalism are the holy trinity of exploitation.

This shit writes itself.

Anyone that gets their own country involved in a bloodbath like WW1 is fair game if you ask me.

WW1 was a collective madness with everyone guilty.
I'd make an exception for the Nuremberg Trials.

Uuuuuuuh. Actually sweetie, it was 100 trillion. But they were all Kulaks so they deserved it.

Anarchism and monarchism aren't incompatible, as long as property rights are respected everything is fine

You have officially lost the right to use the Gadsden flag.

North Korea is a democratic republic

Except we aren't talking about some abstract theory. We're talking about an absolute monarch who would have kept that power given the chance, had it not been for decades of social and literal struggle Nicky's grandad would have never yielded an inch. And even under the NEP farmers were better off than during the monarchy when their new "rights" that were somehow "granted" by an establishment which was never legitimate in the first place.

it's People's Democratic republic
as if one word isn't enough, they used all words relating to "people"

Libertarians love BDSM because deep down they know they deserve punishment

By seizing the state through a CIA-backed coup and establish a libertarian free market utopia until it falls apart because capitalism cannot function without the state.

...

...

I'm too tired to make it myself, but someone please screencap the thread and make a compilation of the ancap defending an autocracy.

I don't think the other heads of state were any better, honestly. But I don't think calling what happened a "madness" absolves them of their decisions. Russia's involvement in the war crippled it's economy and caused widespread food shortages.

DUDE KILLING CHILDREN LMAO

They would have been assassinated either way probably

tsarism killed plenty of children

When you're in fucking Tsarist Russia and you're pissed as fuck your life is so shit, and a French Revolution magnitude event happens, royal children are an inevitability let's just be honest.

You don't go to the guillotines not expecting to see some dead kid. Particularly when an event happens this rapidly and sudden.

won't
somebody
PLEASE
think
of the children

...

...

Proposition: if something equal to the magnitude of the Russian Revolution happens again and in a state with a monarchy, how about simply hiding the children in some far out-of-the-way backwater and "legally" kill them, but in reality they're simply renamed and educated as to why they're living a new life?

the prime minister of russia was made a carpenter iirc

...

Kinda like the last Emperor of China, he was a commited Maoist later in his life.

...

He had to be or else it was *self-criticism* time

If you mean in something like the United Kingdom, or the Netherlands, I don't even see why you'd need to "kill" the Royal family. They don't hold any power anymore : sure, they are muh privileged, but it's a factor of national unity and it's culture.

cry more bicth nigga

Best fucking day of my life

Thank you righteous Moderator Overlords.