Why do you hate this guy?

Yes, revolution must start in the first world, read marx
Kek, mtw is literally «brown people are good coz they're brown» even a retarded child(like most third worldists, in fact) could understand such a ridiculous religion.
You maoists don't understand basic materialism nor economics, please leave

We are jealous of his dialectic skillz.

Historical materialism isn't that prescriptive either, I don't think you really understand the method of Marx' critique - Revolution happens where the proletariat "finds the power laying in the streets" as Lenin said, and material conditions does not only theoretically imply that revolution is more likely to occur in underdeveloped countries, but we also have hard historical evidence that it does. Revolution in the Third World is the dissolving the primary contraction (global imperialism) that perpetuates capitalism, and only through cutting off supplies and capital exports of the First World we can shape a communist movement within it that has the potential to transcend the lower stage of communism. Everything else is pure idealism, pretending that you will get the First World proletariat to act against its own selfish interest as long as capitalism is global, and obscure theories about communization completely ignore material conditions.

Pathetic. Grow up asshole.

Third worldism does sound plausable were it not for the fact that both china and the USSR cutting off resources to the west didnt do it and china is a capitalist country itself now.

That's correct, party because some of the Eastern Bloc countries decided to supply the First World with cheap labor power themselves, the GDR was a huge IKEA assembling store by the 80s.Thats peak revisionism obviously. Similar to China which turned itself into a sweatshop. I'd like to make an observation though in regards to China (and partly Russia): Despite returning to authoritarian capitalism, China was always self-determined. There is an important difference between countries which supply the First World as a self-determined nations and countries subjected to imperialism or are imperialist puppets. China managed to evolve it's productive forces that they are now turning into a service economy, and become some sort of imperialist actor itself, being the middle men between resource extraction in Africa and the arrive of assembled commodities in the West. China is less and less a viable country for the West to outsource cheap labor to. This is what capitalism does, it evolves productive forces.

How is this relevant to my point? African countries or countries subjected to imperialist exploitation in general can not evolve productive forces as long as they are not self-determined, simply due to the fact that more wealth gets extracted out of Africa than amount of investments (a trade deficit of roughly 70 billion every year), which means the semi-feudal societies of Africa can never have primitive accumulation of capital amongst the national bourgeoisie: A phenomenon that requires specific conditions. Without primitive accumtulation there is no cycle of reinvestment, and this is crucial for capitalism to do its job. That's why you need revolution in the Third World, and Marxist-Leninist state socialism has proven that it can survive, despite hazardous conditions, it is more sufficient than mere capitalist national liberation, which leads to capital flight (prime example Zimbabwe) in terms of developing a diversified, autarkical economy.

So despite Russias and Chinas fallback to capitalism, their transformation to a service economy will not solve the problem global capitalism has in the long run: It might eventually run out of countries. In Nepal for example, there is currently a struggle going on between opportunist socialists and Maoists, who want to not make concessions to Indian imperialism which has been outsourcing cheap labor and general misery to Nepal. These small insurrections are the forefront of dismantling the primary contradiction of our time.

You know I honestly never thought about it like that. That makes sense I guess.

They hate Jason because He told them the truth.

He doesn't belong in front of a camera but behind a keyboard in some musty old forum. Replace whatever he says with fedora atheist talking points and tell me that I'm wrong.

he should do something to show it every now and then. i still remember the time he replied to a bunkermag wall of text with a 3 paragraph blog post that was basically "no u". the article wasn't even about him.
people even try to say that he's a good debater and it's like they've never seen someone debate since grade school. he just repeats his thing over and over until the other guy wants to kill himself for accepting to have a debate over skype.

Because he knowingly spews bullshit about Stalin, the USSR, and most of all, the DPRK

And yes, he is smart.

Memed this.

I don't

Based Ruhe

We need to hook up Jason OnRoo with a state sponsored girlfriend.

damn I feel actually bad for him. he probably will never have a family of his own.

Jasons pretty mature about it.

Not sure what the nipponese slideshow was supposed to mean.

Wew, you maotists truly have no idea about economics at all.

Communism is totally not an alternative to capitalism as maoists and third worldists think, but a mode of production adapted to high automation of work, which is why any try to stablish a communist society in an undeveloped country will undoubtedly in a genocidal dictatorship.

Also superexploitation theory of asimetrical exchange is mechanisist and infanile, totally anti-marxist

How about a government policy of "No one gets x until everyone gets x" except this time expand it to girlfriends too.

No one gets to have food until everyone has a girlfriend.

Thats a straw man against socialism, you want equality, that must mean equality off all things

He looks like a fucking rat, that's why

How about you jerk it off some more and quench your thirst a little bit.

Does he still live with is mom?

wat?

Oh, to clarify I meant no one gets food until everyone that wants to be in a relationship gets it. I didn't feel like fleshing it out, but I could write quite a bit about how it could work, how it could be a voluntary, opt-in system etc

Fuck off jason

None of this adresses any of the points I've made, you're just being an spastic again. All you did was claiming communism = automation despite Marx was very critical of people making speculations about the concrete character of communism and then you made an emotional appeal to muh gorillions while socialism has been evidently better and more sustainable for people than the capitalist hell the Third World proletariat lives in.

A Leftcom calling someone infantile, my fucking sides. Also, don't tell me that, tell that to the proletarians who are affected by it, or just admit you are no different than a Neocon or a Fukuyama type. Also, calling a materialist analysis of modern capitalism anti-Marxist because it's different from 19th century capitalism but at the same time thinking that 21st century computerization and automatization is totally Marxist is late stage mental acrobatics. Why are you so fucking triggered by this anyway? You sound more angry than Jason kek

Is he a wizard?

I don't hate him, I just think his haircut is fucking stupid and disagree with him on some things.

Probably, but who cares? At least it didn't turn him into a dumb kekistani faggot like most virgins. I'm actually proud of him for having the balls to take a stand for something that has meaning.

Likely, since he keeps his demeanor and monotone voice when he gets very angry.

I don't hate him, aside from memeing on this board I'd just rather forget he exists, which would be pretty easy to do as he is not relevant in any way shape or form politically.

I'm kind of surprised he is still around but I'm also kind of surprised he is still as small of a channel as he is, in this age of youtube where debates are like pro-wrestling more than they're informative a dude that is basically a caricature of communism should be a shoe in for success but he cant even make dividends in that cheap ass way. Sad.

I hate all e-celeb bullshit

As opposed to a dumb turd worldist that wants to kill all the janitors for their imperialist crimes? That's only barely less awful.

Because he's a narcissistic, politically illiterate brainlet.

t. Holla Forumsyp

nigga pls, Holla Forumsyps are insects to me

That doesn't follow from Third-Worldism.

A revolution won't happen in the first world *first*, but the first world proletariat can still make real, concrete, tangible attacks on global capitalism, not the least of which becoming an ungovernable mess in order to stop military imperialistic ventures abroad (as was the case in the USA during the Indochina invasions).

commonruin.wordpress.com/2015/06/15/first-world-phantoms/

Dropped reading this when the guy conflated manufacturing output with superexploitation. He clearly doesn't understand how primitive accumulation has to presuppose capitalism, which is prevented through superexploitation.

the rate of exploitation has a direct relationship to output per unit of labor, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about