Holla Forums insanity

cant agree
every religious thread on there shows most posters are nihilists who believe religion is a convenient tool to enforce morals on the population
until the shitposters from >>>/christian/ show up and trigger the few orthodox slavs on there
which ends up triggering the varg types
and then it descends into nonsense and cross-board flaming

Are u cute?

Fuck off, Christianity will never conform to your meme ideology

Baka desu senpai
Lucifer was the first Egoist Anarchist and has always been advocating for humanity's rational self-interest, embrace Lucifer's teachings.

Communism is Satanist at it's core and does not mind stepping over spooky shit, specially not Abrahamic religions.

Hail Satan!

were your parents Christian?
mad at daddy?
dating a black guy just not getting him mad enough?
embrace the teachings of edgy hippies from the 60's who dropped too much acid

If you haven't accepted crab our friend an comrade into your heart you're not my comrade.

it posted fucking anime

just your usual cuckold who lost to leftism because he couldn't provide his own income due to too many games to play

LaVeyan Satanism (the most popular brand of Satanism in America) is mostly a bunch of Randian bullshit tbh

patheos.com/blogs/pantheon/2011/06/ayn-rand-godmother-of-satanism/

Spooks, they're believers not realists. They're religious, they have fixed ideas.

reading :^)

What is that one on the right supposed to represent?
Jews making shitty video game accessories\?

Based by the number of Holla Forums threads on this board, watching Holla Forums is the favourite pastime of almost everyone on Holla Forums.

I wonder why.

The fuck I will know I didn't make that img.

...

gets the point across on how much ideology dominates Holla Forums. It's good enough.

I dont think ideology motivates >>>Holla Forums
they're not motivated by an undying love for wanting to seize the means of production
motivated by unending rage more tbh

satan-chan has nice tits tbh

...

has to be bait

all Holla Forumsyps are just confederates larping as nazis and that's a fact

maybe the yanks
how do you explain the non-american ones?

Science fiction and diaries by NEETs about worker struggles dont count.

wtf I love capitalism now

It's fun to pick on the drooling kid in class.

gg

Does he mean LaVeyan (which are just LARPing atheists) or Luciferian (actual devil worshippers, which are basically nonexistant?)

Either way, lol

He means the kikes
pastebin.com/429ZnnsU

Holy fuck what is wrong with these people. This is coming from a Brazilian too, meaning he must be the son of some kind of landed aristocrat or something.

jews worshipping Moloch in kabbalistic rituals is just an extremely gory and sick version of Christians worshipping Satan in Black Mass rituals
except a Black mass involves a woman fellating a goat and an orgy whereas sacrificing to Moloch involves draining the blood from non-jews and ritually consuming it
sort of a fucked up version of worshipping Ba'al Hammon the former king of the gods in the Canaanite/Phoenician pagan pantheon

If you're an insecure sack of shit yourself, then sure.

Focus on converting them, not mocking them and driving them even further into their own retarded delusions.

Not an argument. How about debunking the actual image instead of memeing like a retard?

Cry more you pisspants memeing retard.

thinking :^)

God damn is this the intellect of leftypol you guys circlejerk about?

...

What the actual fuck is even your point?
That wall of text sure debunked one user who didn't bother reading the first paragraph of an article before posting.
You're still being hysteric.

Children have a higher chance of gaining asylum, so it's not a surprise some try to pass as younger than they actually are. I'm 25 but I look like 18, and would definitely try to use that to my advantage were I to find myself in such a situation.

According to a German Federal Service for Migration and Refugees paper, approximately one quarter of refugees are female — so they're mostly definitely not "all male". The over-representation in males is explained by the fact that the journey is extremely dangerous and most of those who take the chance are young males hoping to reunite with their family at some point. Plus, there's the fact that most of those who died in drownings were women and children.

Rescue efforts happened closer and closer to the Libyan coast as time went on because smugglers provided migrants with increasingly unsound, overloaded and/or damaged boats.

.. Yes, what about those?

Not sure where the data is from nor what the point is supposed to be.

Because in any given demographic, young males are the most crime-prone. The median age of Syrians is 24, that of Germans is 40.

Of course they have "no qualification", most worked as factory workers and farm laborers in their home country — it's not exactly their fault if Europe became a service economy when they outsourced the manufacture and agriculture abroad.

Truly the highest level of bait, when you can shitpost on one board and get guaranteed replies on another

why should I? the image literally has nothing to do with leftism

It's talking about a thread which was posted on leftypol, so clearly it had something to do with your politics or you guys wouldn't have made such a fuss about it.

Also, within the image lies an argument. You'd know this if you fucking read the content of the image.

But no, please go on about how I should read a book. It's entertaining.

Protip: If you won't (can't) refute an argument, then just don't reply. You're just embarrassing yourself.

Whoops, forgot to take off my shitposting flag

...

i bet if every person on Holla Forums were given a girlfriend Holla Forums would cease to exist. their paranoia, hatred, bigotry, rage etc. is directly correlated to the lack of gfs they have. proof: their sister board, r9k, is nearly identical in the userbase.

...

We're the new mongols guys.

The roads will run rancid with the fat of rotting corpses. This is only the beginning of our meme war! Praise kek!

A U T I S M

Nice Le ebin BTFO. Do you realize how eternally repetitive you are? pic related

Why? The OP in that pic was clearly wrong.
This really is just a team sport to you isn't it?

Holla Forums is not a hivemind

WE WUZ MONGOLS AND SHEEIIT

It all started in 2007.
In the year of Bazinga…

Fresh off the boat from reddit, kids.
not really

As if anyone takes leftypol seriously.

n o m a d o l o g y

good taste in music tho

That since an user posted something inaccurate here, we aren't that well read/good readers, and therefore hypocritical ?
I'm willing to give you that, but even then it doesn't refute much or even anything in the whole set of what socialist theory has to offer. It's just about numbers of refugees or whatever. Nothing about why the socialist project is impossible or unpractical, which is what we are the most concerned with here.
When people condescendly tell you to "read a book", they basically say "know your enemy". Just take a quick look at the Wikipedia pages about socialism and Marx before sperging there about muh redpill and muh helicopter ride.
Nick Land is a good right-winger for example because he knows very well what the Marxist project entails, but reject it on his own terms. And he is at the same time refining the right-wing theory by criticizing some strands of it (like white nationalism) which he deems as ill-omened. Everyone should read him.

And btw, to come back to immigrants, I've lived all my life in France and never had personally more problems with non-white people than before the refugee crisis (i.e. none than I can recall in the last few of years).
The problems mainly come from descendents of the immigrants from former colonies. The perpetrators of the terrorist attacks we had last year were part of this demographic.
The fact that they are no many jobs available who can guarantee them (and the French youth in general) a comfortable life nowadays, unlike a few decades ago, is to blame IMO.
But you see, as I'm typing all this shit, I realize I'm anticipating your positions, maybe inaccuratly, and we could have a debate about refugees all day, but the truth is : we only see that as a symptom of the capitalist hegemony over the world. And pointing out that someone here failed to read accurately some stats about this symptom, whose implications aren't very important to us btw, doesn't BTFO us.

Mein Gott, why did I spend 40minutes of my life writing this shit ? smh

This is how you know you're talking to a classcuck. If you own or run a firm it becomes pretty obvious that it matters.

People on Twitter are a larger demographic than Holla Forums, and people on Twitter are closer to us politically; I wouldn't be that confident Holla Forums.

...

not really
I post regularly on Holla Forums and I have sex slaves of both sexes
building myself a harem tbh

Is that some cuck/pol/?

...

Found one more. A fine demonstration of reactionary internationalism.

It's actually Holla Forums

First two pics are about Corbyn's near-victory.

Are there any societies which are neither? Because I'm fairly sure math says no. Unless we get to imaginary spouses. Maybe he meant waifu societies?

Eh, same thing these days. It feels like cuckchan's other boards have been colonized Holla Forums even more so than here, somehow.

I think he means polyandry.
I get his underlying point though, societies where a man can have more than one spouse tend to be less cohesive and more violent. It's a point of contention.
It's just that the argument of promiscuity doesn't follow. Yeah one man having sexual relations with more than one woman can be a source of envy, but the real problem is men hoarding wives, not one woman having sex with a dozen men.

apart from issues such as
general health of the population
inheritance and heritage
basic jealousy, the emotion left over from our instincts meant to enforce monogamy in pair bonds to ensure survival of genetic material

you could have just saved some time and said "human nature"

but then the semantics would be argued

The irony of religious people's fascination with leftism (actually just liberals most of the time) and Satanism is that by modern ethical standards, Satan was a bro that rebelled against an evil and unjust deity. They are basically complaining that not everyone is thirsty for koolaid.

How are Tories this fucking pathetic

also because edgy teens who ascribe to leftism also look up to lavayen satanism
all jew cults are worthless
their bad boy offshoot cults even more so

...

Abrahamic then if you wanna be petulant

I want to be petulant.

I meant actual theistic Satanism. LaVeyan Satanism was just Ayn Rand with death metal imagery.

For people who spout off about Jews being responsible for all bad things that happen, how could they not confuse the two.

again its still

Every single mode of thought since the beginning of fucking time

How horrifying

I know
its picking a side when the option is always there to follow noone, become your own master

*unsheathes katana*

*teleports behind you*

You're two sides of the same coin.

At this point I'm convinced you're not only one person, but being pushed by the Mercers

I like going on Holla Forums and RPing as the dumbest ideologue. The only people who call me out are Swedes who everyone else immediately goes after.

Is that screencap you?

Yeah, that was me.

and people responded seriously?

You're doing more harm than good.

Yeah, Holla Forums is literally unable to distinguish cartoony exaggeration

And why do I care?

yes feed the internet hate machine
hate makes us stronger

So the fact that it was taken seriously confirms that when Holla Forumstards talk about 'European culture' they literally just mean cartoon stereotypes.

Well this idea is actually Gnostic and has lilterally nothing to do with the idea of acting in one's rational-self-interest in a utilitarian hedonistic way like Stirner, who is an individual utilitarian (he does whatever gives him the greatest happiness in the moment at the least expense to his current happiness). Gnosticism is all about renunciation of the physical world, and thus drinking, fucking, smoking, eating fine foods are all off-limits for the most part. So this person is probably referring to Eliphas Levi, Crowley type "ritual magick" luciferianism which mutated from Theosophy, Nietzsche etc

wow you're really doing the Lord's work

Kinda.

Most images that they post about """""European culture""""" is usually just skinny blonde women caked in make up wearing shitty dresses in wheat fields. They seem to have a thing against modernity and advancement. I even notice them using skyscrapers as evidence of cultural destruction in the past.

Lol I only just opened this image and realized some nutjob actually screencapped my post.

I used to post on /r9k/ all the time, and I have always been a /lefty/.
I also find it much easier to argue leftist stuff there than on Holla Forums.

by being funny and pointing out when the NSA and Prog Libs are doing stupid shit, the rest is bluster and propaganda. We aren't well known or good at this so they dominate us in unique users and we aren't gaining ground at all and haven't gained a large user base since the election.

t. newfag

Whelp Holla Forums now has unironic cuckolding threads.

There are about 6.4 billion non-Europeans on earth which need to be exterminated fyi.

t. genocidal white supremacist

You're incorrect.

...

200+ posts in one hour arguing which is more redditpilled, blacks fucking white women because the cuckold is in control and allowing the black to have something, or screwing black women because the white man is in charge.

What the fuck happened to Holla Forums when I was away?

I love how she looks like she'd dying a little inside.

You mean polygyny? Because I'm fairly sure it was much more common than polyandry.

Anyway, I get your point. I think he misses the mark too by blaming promiscuity, altho it's related. What would cause more violence (assuming that theory is right) is that promiscuity, or maybe the sexual freedom that includes it, implies fewer marriages, or at least that fewer stable, long-term pair bondings, occur in that society.

But the thing is, it's a bit tempting to blame the violence and lack of cohesion merely on lack of stable homes. After all, that's what seems to be happening in modern society. However, in polygynous societies, children supposedly are born in families with a father and several mothers, so they're stable homes, which wouldn't explain the violence. The point in common between modern society and polygynous ones is a surplus of single men, and in the polygynous societies, which didn't reach modernity, it would also mean those surplus men were young. I can see a source of collective, personal frustration manifesting as social unrest. I've read people say that's one of China's time bombs, as they have an immense male surplus population right now.

Disclaimer: these ideas are speculative and full of assumptions, and aren't necessarily what I believe.

Kek, Swedes are the only smart fashies then.

Well yeah, that's Fascism 101. See Eco's essay on ur-fascism.

Frankly, I see their point. Proletarian tenements from 1900 had far more artistic flair and effort put into them than all of Porky's steel-and-glass phallii combined.

But user, I read things by people who are more intelligent than Marx and don't falsify data.

Whoops forgot rest of post:

They're neolibs with SJW identity politics.

If anything they're equidistant between leftypol and pol.

Your thinking is too binary.

Those on the right are more attractive than the left. Nice try though:

archive.is/hOfuT

this can't be real.

Trolls and shills happened. It's all over 4chan, r9k, b, and bant included.

...

I linked a study:

archive.is/hOfuT

Personally I don't care how unattractive you are. But if you're going to project with "UR UGLY IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ME!" I'll debunk it. Stick to the issues.

I actually am more attractive.

It wasn't even a study of demographics, it was a study of political figures. Most right-wing politicians are richer than left-wing politicians. Richer people can afford to look better.

It amazes me how far you people will go to protect your adolescent self-image. The moment any of you appear to have embarrassed yourselves you put up a massive smokescreen of fallacious statistics and "studies" about issues which are so abstract and subjective that numbers based reasoning is meaningless and inherently unscientific.

Your ideology is more farcical than any other the liberal movement has yet conceived. It has almost no actual political impetus, no material goals, no real actioning. It's just an aesthetic, a viscous and toxic apparatus to protect the ego.

One of the "poorest" Senators (Bernie Sanders) has 3 nice homes and a net worth of over a million. Are you saying Nancy Pelosi is unattractive because she somehow can't afford makeup and plastic surgery? That bitch has botox, makeup, and hairdye.

Also testosterone is more attractive in men and conservatives have more of it as well as muscle mass:

psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/political-motivations-may-have-evolutionary-links-to-physical-strength.html

Also wider facial structure = more attractive and higher testosterone and it's linked with "prejudice":

psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/facial-structure-may-predict-endorsement-of-racial-prejudice.html

You can squirm in any way you'd like. The right don't need the government. They are stronger than you. They look better than you. That's why "HURR DURR LOOK AT THIS CHERRYPICKED PICTURE OF A REDDITOR IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ME UR HIM!" is silly.

Yeah and posting a few pictures a a redditor is DEFINITELY scientific. Research is "unscientific" because you say so.

Your ideology is more farcical than any other the liberal movement has yet conceived. It has almost no actual political impetus, no material goals, no real actioning. It's just an aesthetic, a viscous and toxic apparatus to protect the ego.

Many words. Little substance. Typical lefty.

Also it's always leftypol going over the looks thing (Even in this very thread) so I don't know what the hell you're talking about. Typical lefty hypocrisy.

Commie party ate while the beta proles starved. Oh let me guess "NOT REAL COMMUNISM! MY UTOPIAN BRAND OF COMMUNISM HAS NEVER BEEN TRIED!"

We're anti-foreign intervention while the neocons tend to be more open to political correctness.

[Sarcasm]Yes this is literally what happens.[/Sarcasm]

Lefties have the rainbows and sucking on dildos. Nice projection buddy.

His post was shorter than yours and not hard to understand unless you have holes in your brain

Lol no. There isn't a single right wing politician pushed by the alt-right or alt-lite that is in an meaningful way distinguishable from neocons in policy. The fact that you guys say "nigger" more and that Trump tells mean jokes in public doesn't change that. Substance > policy is the sign of an SJW, and that's exactly what you guys are. You care more about being virtue signaled to that being presented with what you claim to want.

care to define communism?

Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton are right wingers, and they're unattractive because they're old as fuck. You're so fucking dumb

No you linked an article. The real one is free, just post that instead of giving MSM clicks. Also don't let them summarize a study for you, always read it yourself.

Also the study was about politicians, not voters or the general population. So the majority of right wingers could still be ugly, they just vote for good looking politicians.

I don't have links atm, but I've read studies that say right wingers tend to be very visual and more likely to react on emotion than left wing (for example if you show a right winger a picture of a norm violation they're much more likely to be outraged about it), I'm sure the two are linked.

Those weren't the only ones in the study. Plus what makes you think a commie is going to look different from your average progressive?
They overlap big time. Also you ignored the other 2 studies measuring the general population's facial structure, muscle mass, and testosterone and their views.

You're going to say "Communism means a classless society according to Marx therefore Communism was never tried". That's semantics.

All countries who were communist (Or pushed for communism) failed.

I linked 2 other studies. Wider faces and more muscle = testosterone = attractiveness. For example, more testosterone means you're taller, have a "handsomer" face, and have broader shoulders. These all show high testosterone and are therefore more attractive. High testosterone means a healthier immune system which is why it's attractive in men.

I have heard studies that lefties in general have a more sensitive amygdala and are thus more easily offended.

I'm not trying to stick to this "issue". It's more just a response to the use of peer pressure to insult opponents rather than their ideas. Seen many people from leftypol do that here and elsewhere with these images. I'd be happier to talk actual issues.

Perceptive. I ignored them because I didn't address them, nor was I intending to. I addressed one point with exactly the point I meant to respond with, which speaks to the larger point that you're just talking about republicans and democrats as if anyone here gives a fuck about either. None of us are democraps, and if you're unironically a republican you're way too dumb to talk to anyway.

If you're an aut-righter or Holla Forumsyp or whatever other fringe right wing movement then you need to stop pretending that studies about John Doe out in Nebraska have anything to do with you.

I hate to defend the soviet union but as shit as it was it didnt "fail" much at all. Numerous other socialist governments either didnt fail either, or "failed" because of foreign intervention on grounds of OH SHIT MY PROFITS NO NO NO STOP THIS RIGHT NOW

1. Marx didn't define communism. "Hasn't been tried" is a weak-ass strawman. "Hasn't been achieved" is fine. If you think there's no difference, then I direct you to weight watchers where you'll find the difference between "tried" and "achieved" apparent

Capitalism as we know it was not implemented overnight and the transition was long and brutal. The idea that "it didn't work before" means that "it will never work" and "it's no longer worth trying" is ahistorical to any meaningful progress in the history of mankind. You're just extra obsessed with this current state of "failure" because you're alive in the present day with a mind too weak and prone to propaganda to see the bigger picture.

Who gives a flying fuck you stupid fucking burger?

Hillary was a huge hawk though. The difference between her and Trump though was that she wanted to focus on Russia, whereas Trump wanted to focus on China.

You *didn't read* the study about testosterone. Its been passed around here a million times. What it actually shows is that poor men are more likely to favor redistribution if they are strong and rich men are more likely to favor it if they are weaker. The media is parsing this as 'choosing a distribution that benefits you = you are right wing'. According to this reading a poor man who is a socialist is "right wing". This has been discredited in many outlets many times for many years and its embarrassing that you'd try to pass it off here.

businessinsider.com/study-strength-politics-conservatives-liberals-2013-5

So you admittedly just skipped over the 2 best articles. Those go by views and study the general population.

Then why do you think a random cherrypicked picture has anything to do with the "alt-right" or that it matters? If anything the left looks worse, but I don't really care about that. Leftypol posts stuff like that and it's most likely false. That's the point. If you want to talk issues we can, but you can't win a beauty pageant if you put the average lefty against the average right winger and there's no evidence for the opposite conclusion that pictures posted often imply that is the right look worse.

East Germany and North Korea are objectively worse than their West and Northern counterparts. Eastern European countries still lag behind Western Europe. The Chinese, Vietnamese, and Laotian Communist parties are now moving towards state capitalist with improvements being made in quality of life (Though it is imperfect). Cuba is so terrible people constantly walk over to Guantanamo Bay or hop on life rafts to escape it.

Communist countries built walls to keep people in. Capitalist countries built walls to keep them out.

And I understand Guatemala not working due to the CIA, but Cuba was successful in its revolution and is doing pretty bad now that the Soviets aren't around to throw money at them.

The Cold War was basically 2 sides trying to undermine and overthrow each other. Both had superpowers on their side. One was objectively better in terms of standards and survived. The Capitalist countries have survived foreign intervention - why haven't the communist ones survived?

Capitalists don't say capitalism hasn't been achieved. We point to results especially from countries who transitioned from communism to capitalism. It's not perfect, but it's better.

Feudalism was brutal. Capitalism uplifted living standards across the world. Those children working in factories in the 1800's were there because in earlier generations they'd be dead. It's not perfect, but it's been shown to be better in terms of quality of life. That said there are improvements to be made like limiting cronyism caused by the state picking winners and losers.

Trump wanted to pressure China on trade. Hillary wanted to sanction Russia and to essentially shoot down Russian jets.

So:
Wealthy + Strong = Right
Wealthy + Weak = Left
Poor + Strong = Left
Poor + Weak = Right

If true that disproves the implication that right wingers are less attractive which was what I was trying to do.

That still leaves the other 2 studies.

*South counterparts

Yeah the disparity of genders in China is a really interesting subject IMO, I wonder if they have their own parallel /r9k/ culture. Pic related is from ChinaSmack.

Yep, and the transition from one to the other was bloody as hell and spanned several centuries. You're just looking at the transitionary period and concluding it's all not worth it.

Communism is the real movement that wishes to abolish the current state of things. We seek to establish a Socialist word order.

try harder

Yep, because they're meaningless for exactly the reasons I outlined
Do we look like we're writing up a thesis, bitch? This is some seriously autistic shit. When we find pictures of Holla Forumsyps that look like faggots (and most of the ones we come across happen to match that, deal with it) then we'll laugh at them and call them faggots. When you got swirlies in high school did you also do this weird faggy thing where you go "well see technically you can't prove that I'm of lesser attractiveness and by metrics it seems that actually you are the real unattractive person"? Jesus fuck you're a long-winded dweeb.

The early experiments with capitalism while feudalism still dominated the world-system were all failures; some quite bloody. A mode of production does not spring like Athena from Zeus' head. The places where a socialist mode of production has been sincerely attempted have had some very good results (greatly increasing education and life and health indicators, universal housing) and some very shitty results (limited selections of consumer goods, extensive state surveillance and penal systems). This is why, despite their flaws, they are more popular than capitalism for people who lived under both (see the pew attitudes to communism surveys with attention especially to people 40 and older who actually lived under communism). It stands to reason that future socialist societies will do even better and retain the policies that produced good results and amend the ones that produced poor results.

Daily reminder that Anton LaVey himself admitted his beliefs were HEAVILY inspired by Ayn Rand. Not only that but he made made shitty vegan-tier moralist arguments when it came "muh animals", and he himself was a capitalist, AND supported the idea of private property.

...

But there's been no "transition" after many attempts and all attempts have been disasters. Why try for the #26,860 time?

Call a spade whatever you want. What is it with all these semantics?

You guys've been giving long winded replies this whole time and jumped in trying to debunk the research.

So it'd be like the bullies saying "Well technically sir…" in response.

Also you're on a thread about generalizing Holla Forums with those pictures. In order to generalize you need some accuracy or else it's silly. There's more evidence and pics of lefties being like that then Holla Forums if anything.

The west has greater indicators like you just listed better than all communist countries.

Look at East Germany vs. West Germany and North Korea vs. South Korea. Look at Mao's China vs. Deng's China. Communism wasn't an improvement - it was a sock to the chest.

People didn't really have to force capitalism politically and the results spoke for themselves. Also capitalism didn't crash and cause more harm than feudalism - it uplifted people.

What's inaccurate? One of these fat chuds went together through LA and rolled their fat burger asses right through Armenian territory and one of them ended up getting stabbed

They're incredibly stupid and obese people, I don't see this observation as inaccurate. It's been observed, repeated, etc.

...

I would argue it has.

you don't "achieve" Communism, that's the point.

Also their are a lot of material reasons Socialist experiments of the past saw hardships, Its a lot more complicated then just.

One data point doesn't make a trend. In fact most pics of Trump supporters or the "Alt-Right" as well as their spokespeople are average looking or slightly above average in attractiveness. If you wanna say "It's just a pic bro" then there's plenty more lefties like that:

South Korea is better than North Korea. West Germany is STILL better than former East Germany to this day. You'll never hear a capitalist coming up with excuses like "Well there are some material conditions…." It's a tough world. Capitalist countries face civil wars, foreign intervention, colonialism, espionage, etc. but they're better than similarly afflicted communist countries. If communism is so fragile then that's proof enough that it's bad.

It rose quality of life in terms of life expectancy and personal wealth of the individual. There was no massive collapse during the transition from feudalism to capitalism that left them worse off than before. Imagine how great North Korea, Eastern Europe, China, and former East Germany would've been without communism.

What on Earth does that mean

This is excellent bait

It has also lead to the destruction of those two things, and Capitalism will end with the total destruction of its reliability to be responsible for such

Tbh I've seen like an ocean of fat alt right people but the only people I've seen you post are those same three pictures of a leftist.

It really seems like you're in high school or dropped off the map since graduating or dropping out, I can't say for certain you've experienced other people first hand

so are lefties bad for being violent and scary or being scrawny fag weaklings? your mental gymnastics beauty spooks aren't really giving me any information

If you believe that North Korea is somehow "Communist" or "Socialist" I recommend you leave this board.
This is more of failure for capitalism then the state run bureaucracy that was the late eastern block.
Except you will. Their is no magic to the market that can triumph over the material world. Only innovation and proper allocation of resources can. These things where hard to due for a multitude of circumstances in eastern block countries, and other socialist experiments. You have still failed to talk about them and instead resorted to talking hot air.
So did most """""""""Communist""""""""" countries
Modern history of anti-imperialist struggles would say otherwise
this speaks volumes about your Autism Level
A value statement like this is not an argument. Arguable, totalitarian states that have no regard for the sake of their citizens are "stable", is this how we should model our world?

didn't mean to sage
my bad

One guy looks like Hitler (Is he right wing?)
2 guys in gas masks.
1 cartoon webpage.

The others are mostly duplicates or average looking.

It means seeing someone eat doesn't mean there's no world hunger.

Stefan Molyneux, Lauren Southern, and Paul Joseph Watson are above average aesthetically. Half those cherrypicked pics you posted had average looking or higher people - and that's the worst you could find.

Capitalism allows higher life expectancy and more personal wealth than feudalism and communism. The only debate is between going more libertarian or more SocDem as opposed to our current crony capitalist system.

They're violent because they're cowards who use numbers, weapons against the unarmed, and attack women and old ladies. They're also cowards. You can be both.

youtube.com/watch?v=AMmVpDwyCik

Actually all photos are unique except the one with Stalin that has 1 guy from another photo.

What? No they're not at all

Wait so does Capital have problems or not?

...

CRONY

Once again, Communism is not a state to achieve.

Also Cuba has the lowest infant mortality rate in the west. make of this information what you like

I think you mean the only efficient incarnation of capitalism

Tell that to someone in a country that became a colonial holding. Life expectancy declined in British India over an entire decade. Welcome to the free market bitches.

Capitalism has never killed anybody before

never ever

Read the first line of the abstract friend.

i really just can't summize how many layers of mental gymnastics you're on right now. it's pretty appalling. not even touching your classcuckoldry

...

You can't find a successful communist country so you play semantics with "That's not real communism". There are plenty of successful capitalist countries - though imperfect they are better than communist countries.

East Germany was worse than West Germany back when it was communist. East Germany lags behind because communism held it back from the rest of the country.

Nope. I don't need excuses. South Korea and West Germany are better than North Korea and East Germany. Deng's state capitalist China and the Republic of China was better than Mao's communist China.

All first world countries did better and still do better than second world (Communist) countries.

You won't hear an excuse from me. Can we make capitalist countries better? Yes. But they're way ahead of communist countries.

That's my point. All nations faced hardships. The communist countries didn't. Capitalism wins.

Deng's China and the Republic of China are better than Mao's China. South Korea is better than North Korea. West Germany was and is STILL better than East Germany though the East's caught up some.

I don't want imperialism by the way. The US should be less interventionist. Libertarians are anti-intervention and when America was most capitalist it was the least interventionist. Wilson, FDR, and Truman brought us out into the whole "World Policeman" crap.

Not an argument.

The most stable countries (US, Canada, Western European nations, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, etc.) are the least authoritarian. Long term stability comes from people having enough freedom that they let off some steam and don't get so suppressed that they eventually explode and start overthrowing governments.

The dozens (?) of people I post in my pics are mostly all unique. One guy is in 2 pics but the 2nd pic he's in is a large pic with other people.

Yes. All systems do. But I'll take crony capitalism over communism any day. Better than both is a less "cronyistic" form of capitalism.

Might be a kernel of truth to that because fortunately they had the Soviet Union and now Venezuela dumping money into their medical sector. Everything else sucks though which is why they swim over to my country on floating doors.

Then your gripe is with colonialism. Mine is too. Nehru and Indira Gandhi's socialist reforms fucked the country up. Later capitalism made its middle class and economy grow substantially - some claim that it could arguably become a superpower.

Communism has never killed anyone before. Never ever.

Capitalism raises life expectancy.

Deng decreased it more. Tens of millions of Chinese starved until Deng brought in state capitalist reforms and improved things.

More semantics. Do you see capitalists using semantics saying "technically communism killed lots of us!" Why? Because capitalism works and communism doesn't so you need to play the blame game.

..yes? that's literally the point of the black book of communism

Balled up in a fist while marching with an organization that brags about punching opponents.

Says who? You posted 1 right wing MLP I posted 1 lefty.

You can be violent and a coward. When you won't fight someone 1 on 1 but jump then with your friends that's violent and cowardly. When you randomly pepper spray a young college girl in a "Make Bitcoin Great Again" hat then run away that's violent and cowardly

How is that so hard to understand? And it's not Alex Jones farting - it's ANTIFA cringeworthily trying to "train" but nice try deflecting by making up something that never happened.

Did capitalists kill the people of:

We didn't send them to camps and enact failed food distribution policies.

Notice how no mass killings happened in the first world and were blamed on the second world?

Another big reason is that men get drafted into the warring factions. I believe ISIS is also in habit of killing whoever doesn't comply.
sage for dumb thread and random post

what part of 'any population in recorded history' is giving you trouble? Do you think they stopped recording history in 1980?

..i haven't posted any pictures, but since you asked…
here's a picture of aryanne, she's basically the brony equivalent of kek in a sense. just a semi-ironic scapegoat for reactionary memers.

lmfao what is this guy even saying? Western capitalist countries have never faced something near the level of the Russian civil war and the WWII eastern front.

nope! the capitalist death toll is much higher than the ones off all those men combined
and aren't you guys constantly sucking the dick of a guy who threw all political opponents/former allies out of helicopters? this attitude seems a bit disingenuous if you ask me

Did you notice the snow in the background? Any normal person would think 'this guy is balling his hands up because they're cold and he's not wearing gloves' rather than 'what pathetic martial arts style! he brings shame upon the antifa dojo!'

I don't see "any population in recorded history" anywhere in my huge posts nor the many ones I replied to.

So he's an autist that randomly clenches his fist like that? Not much better dude.

They don't preach genocide. Richard Spencer wants an ethnostate just like Malcom X did. I wouldn't want anyone punching Malcom X either.

The girl in the "Make Bitcoin Great Again" didn't want to violently create a fascist ethnostate and if so macing her wouldn't prevent her.

We weren't feudalist like Russia and weren't an aggressive dictatorship that freaked neighbors out like Stalin.

Also the Soviet Union was a superpower so they were not some ineffective, crippled weakling. China, North Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba were certainly powerful on a regional level.

We came out on top.

1. Capitalism has been in practice longer than communism.

2. Those involve things like colonialism and slavery. Both are not capitalism.

3. Many of those are due to natural, unpreventable causes like native americans dying due to disease. No 1 recorded example of a smallpox blanket didn't kill 100 million natives.

Or he could put his hands in his pockets (You can see his phone sticking through his right pocket) or have his hand held out like the other guy. Dude wtf is this autism lol.

...

And you bitch about fucking semantics lmfao

Yes I'm suuuure

whiter than Holla Forums as usual

Never change, leftyshits

Fuck they're distributing funds away from the military to entitlements THIS IS WORSE THAN SPENDING IT IN LIBYA

Customer: "Here's your money."
Shopkeep: "Thank you. Here's your bag."

African Warlord: "You're my slave! I'm gonna sell you to white people!"
Slave: "No!"
Jewish Slave Trader: "Your ancestors will be mine too! You have no choice!"

Politburo: "Give or else gulag for you!"
Citizen: "Ok, don't hurt me!"

AnComm: "Let's abolish classes and distribute things equally!"
Citizen: "No."
AnComm: "Please…."
Citizen: "No."

But if you give it to me I'll serve it right back. Face it - he cletched his fists out of aggression. Rest your case detective.

100 million natives died due to contracting smallpox by trading with westerners. How's this capitalisms fault? Would proto-communists have simply never came in contact with them?

What does that have to do anything I said? My two examples were both wars of aggression imposed by imperialist powers and capitalist-backed axis.

Are you that fucking dense? An immediate solution to people hoarding food is to take over the industry so they continue to produce and distribute.
Nobody claimed socialism was gonna happen over night. There's something called political programs you dipshit.

Hahahahahaha you sound like my fucking daughter

...

See! You have a choice.

"Voluntaryism" is an infant level understanding of capitalism and politics in general.

You seriously, have to be a neet

There's the problem.

You sound like a whiny bitch. Also I meant semantics over the debate about communism - not about the semantics you started about the fist.

Oh sorry, I forgot the part where the Shopkeep robs him and screams "MUHUHAHAHA! I'm an evil capitalist!"

Slavery is not a choice. They were captured and punished if they escaped. Their ancestors were born into it. How does that have anything to do with voluntarily paying people for things?

You get the point. You choose to pay. They hand over the goods. It's a fair transaction with no force involved.

Whatever dude, you're the one sounding like a petulant elementary school student

You're right, I do. That's why I'm calling you a neet who doesn't understand what this board is even about

As opposed to the evil communist population of the Soviet Union you love creating out of whole cloth

You don't even understand how profitable war is, and how it will never stop under late capitalism. I mean you think capitalism is just buying a sandwich because your mom told you to get out of the house

colonialism and slavery literally only happened at all for the sake of capitalism. do you have any idea how useful free land and uneducated, unpaid workers is for capital?

really makes me think that le capitalist defeners really just don't understand the system they love so much, even on a basic level. it's almost like what's really here isn't defensible and you're just idealizing it to avoid thinking critically about the system you live within

Point is - slavery isn't capitalism.

They took people to prison amps and shot them for disagreeing. Shopkeeps don't do that in capitalist countries.

When America was most capitalist it was least interventionist. The most free market people (Libertarians) are known for being some of the most anti-war.

Bloody fucking hell, there isn't a "most" or "least" capitalist, what you are living in, right now

Is still

Fucking Capitalism!

Don't call it crony, it is exactly the same, in fact I would argue it's more capitalist now than it was in the last fifty god damn years

Hm, USA really never did that before during the Cold War. Makes you think.

Thank you for your freedom, and burgers CIA

But it is. Slavery, feudalism and capitalism are all forms of society based on exploitation.

If you had payed attention to what I said in , then you would remember that their is no such thing as a state of affairs called "communism" let alone a nation that can be called "communist", but I understand you must be having a hard time reading this with an I*Q of 34. Not only this, but North Korea has abandoned the communist ideology as a whole. Their official state ideology is called Juche.
Due to the fact that most eastern block countries taken by the Soviet Union after the second world war had to bend to the will of their already perverted state bureaucracy which had usurped the bourgeois class, I would say yes, they where not really Socialist, but I don't want to start a sectarian conflict with tankies
no shit
Why hasn't unification brought prosperity back to the east? Why was it that GNP dropped for many former Satellite states of the USSR?
The only one giving excuses here is you. My point stands perfectly, yet you have not shown how it is these nations "failed" due to "communism". You continue to talk in circles, quite sad actually.
actual figures showing a sharp rise in the standard of living under Mao would contest, But I somewhat agree with the Deng part.
So are these second world countries still "communist" in your eyes? This might just be poor wording on your part, but going by what I've seen you say so far this worries me. Any who, this is once again more of a problem for capitalism then it is for "Communism".
Are you even trying?
You might want to reread that.
Your right, this speaks more about your reading comprehension level
which seems to have stagnated at the ninth grade
So the whole thing about "weak states" now goes out the window? Please have some integrity to your arguments.

Point is - you are a neet with a basic grasp of what Capitalism actually is. Like a junior high social studies class understanding of what capitalism is.

Capitalism involves voluntary exchanges. Not enslavement or aggressive war.

Plenty of communist states similarly launched aggressive wars and violations of personal liberty.

If anything slavery and aggressive wars (Especially with draftees) are anti-capitalism.

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/capitalism

Wal Mart isn't going to invade a country. Starbucks won't throw you in a labor camp.

So tell me: do people voluntarily adhere to arbitrary notions of private property, or do they do it because of threat of violence by the state?

Ruling Class: "Make me money or starve."
Working Class: "O-ok."
Retard on the internet: "This is a fair system."

Except it quite literally has a market for war right now.

Is Northropp Grumann just not fucking Capitalist now, because……? I don't understand how it wouldn't be?

...

Do you even know what a PMC is

So all the murders, rapists, thieves and counterrevolutionaries in gulag camps were just innocent bystanders?

nope. capitalism involves FORCED exchanges under threat of violence/starvation. it's like saying me putting a gun to your head and telling you to suck my dick is consensual sex

Meant for

...

...

The entire platform of the Socialist Party of the early 1900's has been adopted as official US policy.

Yeah my poor grandma was taken to a camp by those dastardly CIA after she complained about mass starvation caused by the US government.

That's literally the OPPOSITE of capitalism's definition:

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/capitalism

There is no "free" in slavery. Communism forced people into doing things they didn't want to do with the power of the state helping out so slavery is closer to communism.

Thus "That's not REAL communism!"

There are communist countries there are capitalist countries. CApitalist countries are objectively better.

Because collapse brings hardship obviously. Communism is gonna take a while to recover from.

Me: "Communism did X"
You: "Communism's never been tried!"
Me: "They were Communist parties and called themselv-"
You: "COMMUNISM'S NEVER BEEN TRIED!"

I will admit when a nation is capitalist or driving towards capitalist goals - whatever floats your boat. But you won't name a legit one because they all failed and you must dodge.

I said they were worse when they were communist. You left that out. Also communism doesn't magically fade away. It leaves scars.

They SURVIVED hardships or didn't suffer them due to failed policies in food distribution.

No, open states are strong states in the longrun.

Here's the definition:

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/capitalism

Nothing in that says "exploitation".

They are kept from stealing other peoples' stuff. That's not the same as literally enslaving someone.

You choose your work. You negotiate with your employer. You choose what to buy. Just because free shit doesn't grow on trees doesn't mean shit's not free. I'd rather work for food then have no food.

Politburo: "No food. You starve. Object you go to gulag."
Proles: *silent*

[Decades later]
Commie: "NOT. REAL. COMMUNISM."

Last I checked McDonald's doesn't start wars. The government does.

Companies contracted by governments. They don't declare wars. Governments do.

Who carried out the coup? Military and police.

You really think abolishing private companies is going to stop aggressive war? Aggressive war is as old as mankind.

No one forces you to work for them. No one forces you to buy something.

The laws of biology dictate you eat. The laws of physics dictate food doesn't magically appear.

There's no force unless you want to somehow say reality is forcing something on you. Look up positive rights vs. negative rights.

Yeah. That actually sounds plausible.

This is pure autism

And capitalism profits from it, or can lead to the events that directly cause it, the two aren't different. Capitalism does not end where the government begins you fucking delusional high schooler

Ironic.

...

Oil has never caused a war. And capitalist states don't support the market.

Right.

It's all very convenient

[Decades later]
Capitalist: "NOT. REAL. CAPITALISM."

I see.

They're violent because they're cowards who use numbers, weapons against the unarmed, and attack women and old ladies. They're also cowards. You can be both.

How many people have Antifa killed?

How many people have the Right killed in the past decade alone? 272 and this doesn't even count the THOUSANDS of violent hate crimes every year from right wing hate groups.

violence. Many murders, including unplanned or spontaneous acts of violence, are not
included here, nor are thousands of lesser incidents of violence. Such a compilation
would be book‐length.”

- From a Homeland Security report of Right wing violence in 2015

The idea that the left are these violent thugs that engage in violence for no reason is literally a right wing myth and meme.
First, the right spread ideology of hate and violence which is a threat to people in our communities. Every minority, every woman, every immigrant, is threatened by the right and it's rhetoric.

There is literal evidence that right wing rhetoric results in mass violence that you simply do not see on the left. Hundreds of murders, thousands upon thousands of hate crimes.

Bash the fash isn't just the moral thing to do, it needs to be done to defend people in our communities.

Many people DON'T voluntarily submit to the "arbitrary notions" of private property, namely thieves; the apparatus of the state which takes your loot in taxes, controlled interest rates, a million other ways…could be reasonably understood to be an example of a thief. Also, lookup the word "arbitrary", it doesn't mean what you think it means. The notion of private property may be abstract, but it's far from arbitrary. Some abstractions can be beautiful.

k

meant for

the laws of capitalism dictate i have to make the ruling class money in order to have food given to me by the laws of reality. the laws of reality are being explicitly denied to me by this system. thanks for arguing for me

k

This is literally not a response to what I said. It's (as you said before me) literally not communism. And you once again misuse nomenclature.

How is this at all an argument or a response to my point? Your literally just throwing up a proverbial smoke screen with these pathetic walls of text and trying to cover your ass. I't does not matter if a party is "communist" in name, or if a nation can be considered "socialist", name does not correlate with result, case in point the """"democratic""" """"peoples""""" """"republic"""""" of Korea. The reason for these failures of "communist" parties and "countries" can normally be chocked up to revision of Marxist ideas to better suit material circumstances where pursuing the Communist project was less favorable. If material circumstance is not allowing the formation of a Socialist order, then one will not form, or worse it will become perverted by party bureaucrats.
also
As I have been restating constantly, Communism is not a state of affairs, it is a movement. A movement cannot do X, material circumstances are what cause X to happen.

Arguable, but that's for another thread entirely
Really pulling on the old heart strings
Please better your wording, this is still shit. Also, it is a gross oversimplification and leaves out the circumstances that lead to such hardship.

This is very low energy, I want better if you expect me to keep dishing out (you).

Why is the right wing so terrified of antifa anyways? They don't really do much in the states.

Yup, over 20k student debt confirmed.

nope. i have to beg and maybe be picked. unless my dad owns the company in which case wooo free management position. free market capitalism sure is fair
and he fires me if i make explicit demands, another fake choice
i can't choose to not starve, but yeah i guess i can choose to ignore the misery i had to go through to get the money needed for stuff to buy a tv or whatever. this isn't exactly a positive situation.
free shit DOES grow on trees in-fact. then someone came along and decided i had to make them money in order to eat while people like you licked their boots
no shit. that's why this is a forced choice. you work for money for the people who denied you the food in the first place.

oooo & we're doing this again

Ruling Class: "Make me money or starve."
Working Class: "O-ok."
Retard on the internet: "This is a fair system."

...

I stated plenty particulars before, bucko. Throw in every buzzword you want, burger man. But you can't change the fact it ain't a strawman. It's reality.

They've been built up as this massive international terrorist organisation in right wing media.

The right, always has this massive fucking victim complex, so an organization like Antifa, which engages in direct action, plays right into right wing delusion.

As I pointed out, 99.9% of political violence in the west comes from the right (or islamic terrorism.. which is right wing as well). Antifa has never killed anybody, Right wingers killed 3 people in the past month alone. Not to mention all the hate crimes. There was 900 right wing hate crimes in the first week after Trumps Presidency win as they felt massively emboldened.

Also another point to make, notice how like Sargon or Razorfist or whatever "skeptic" always goes on about Antifa, but never, EVER condemns mass right wing violence. It really shows, none of these people have any problem with people getting murdered or thousands of hate crimes that happen near daily if those people murdered or attacked are done in the name of the right.

Chapo and Angela Nagle also made a good point as well. If the Alt-Right wants to achieve it's goals, then they will engage in mass violence with millions dead, because their goals HAVE to be carried out with violence.

Shocking. Get this through your fucking skulls lefties: USG is on YOUR fucking side, for the most part, and has been for close to a hundred years. Harry Hopkins, fucking communist agent, look it up. Please stop posturing as if the US fucking government, the most corrupt empire to have ever existed, is a reliable, objective third party which corroborates your claims. They corroborate your claims because you are their unwitting AGENTS. Also:
WEW
I will concur that the idea of leftist violent thugs is exaggerated, but what can/should we expect from our CIA controlled media apparatus? Watching intersectional violence is cathartic for the peons, they WANT this.

NOT

REAL

CAPITALISM

kek are you serious? This is advanced trolling, well done Holla Forums, i was beginning to think you lefties were really that self-unaware.
But if not troll, even ignoring all counter evidence I could give, consider: every meme will try to paint itself as the victim; it's the way you convince millions of people to die for you. FDR did it, we did it on 9/11, Germany did it in WWII. Don't act like it's not just a tool of propaganda used by you and us both.

so we're allowed to call the Soviet Union rightist, then?

Yes, you do have a victim complex

We are being serious about the far right having a gigantic bitching problem about identity politics of the same distracting vain of sjws that alienates most people

how about convincing millions of people to die for you out of their own self interest instead of feeding them spooks?

America has the worst infrastructure of almost any nation and I'd like the right to expand on that

Why that might be

We aren't the ones claiming that our race is somehow inherently superior to all others though. That's why it is so fucking funny when you guys do it. Also the working class is actually victimized every single day by the bourgeoisie so you are wrong imply that the left has some kind of made up "issue" or "complex" surrounding its very real material victimization.

do you want to go down this road?
inb4 current education secretary; Trump doesn't count, not a real party-man, and neither are his apointees, except deep state plants like Exxon guy, Pence, Priebus, etc.
as for the historical evidence I provided you which you felt the need to shout down with more inane bullshit, I suggest you lookup how many tons of tanks, planes, bombs, bullets, etc., went to Chinese and Russian communists in WWII, even as FDR was telling Americans he was still committed to neutrality.
The US has had socialist and collectivist strands in its DNA since day one to now; not that it's bad or good but be honest about it you twit.

Yes

Hahahahahaha oh man you dipshits don't fail to disappoint

It's had syphilitic old capitalists who philosophize over nothing from day one to now

...

Only Holla Forums does this.

Oh boy, Reagan and McArthy, I gotta tell you, socialist extraordinaires. The Clinton's hand in Yugoslavia and Lybia? God bless America. My biggest allies. All the sewage that spawned from Israel, turned into oil monarchies and mujahideen, helicopter meme men and all. Completely on my side. The fact that even someone like Sanders is a fucking zionist shill? Man I love Clapistan. Best thing to happen to leftism.

So what you mean to say is that everything left of theocratic monarchy is marxist, got it friendo.

Yeah, no shit, they weren't in the Axis' side and the made a killing off it while taking all the credit anyways.

...

yeah that would be nice, but from the perspective of someone who wants their enemies be destroyed, inconvenient (was all I was trying to say). Many would say monarchy is at least honest about its use of conquest.

Many don't claim that, even little Dicky Spencer. other than that,

Well personally I agree with you, but I'm sure many wouldn't. Whites haven't had a real identity since our own native civilization was raped by Rome, so can you really blame them for trying to find a new one through misplaced aggression, or the SJWs for that matter? The modern world makes us all soulless. It's a pathology, meaning it has causes.
no, I'm not

please post counter evidence. Puritans were highly collectivist, started and controlled many important American educational institutions, like, let's see, fucking Harvard. Know that I've instantly discarded your worthless ranting and any intelligent poster woo sees me posting facts and you posting bullshit will do the same. Now fuck off.

Also true.

what exactly?

Is it weird I like posting here more than Holla Forums? please no ban I like talking to lefties

Well, at least we agree on the zionist shill part. Also,

and the WWII shit
what about BEFORE pearl harbor when FDR was saying "in no way, shape, form, manner, yadyada have I or any member of this administration called for American boots on the ground in Europe!1!1"
when actively arming communists against the Japanese; brilliant political trickery; utterly corrupt, utterly leftist, but brilliant. I'm not a theocratic monarchist as you suggest, but I do consider FDR one of the most brilliant and evil men of the 20th century.

for there to even be any argument here, we have to accept your retarded frame of reference where leftism/socialism/communism/marxism is just shorthand for "stuff i don't like"

Not real aut-right

FORGET THAT NIGGER, DIDN'T YOU KNOW THAT AMERICA IS THE FIRST COMMUNIST COUNTRY TO HAVE EVER EXISTED? IT IS ALL MARTIN LUTHERS FAULT!!!111!1!!11

Private property is a social construct, a spook. I could declare myself supreme ruler of the world but it wouldn't mean anything unless everyone else acknowledged it or I had the ability to back up my claim with force, and the latter case would essentially be enslaving others involuntarily.
It is not in the working class's self-interests to acknowledge the ruling class's claim to property, and thus they are coerced into doing so by threat of physical force. Forcing them to adhere to private property laws is itself an act of theft

proto-kekistani memefags confirmed.

STOP FEEDING THE TROLL YOU FUCKING MORONS

He does this on half the damn threads, he just argues in circles in order to shit threads up, and dumbasses always fall for him. Arguing with him serves absolutely no purpose. Please drop it.

Yeah I know it's a bit late to say this but whatever.

Now that you mention it, yeah they probably have. They already have SJWs/cucks (baizuo) and even trumpets, after all.

opendemocracy.net/digitaliberties/chenchen-zhang/curious-rise-of-white-left-as-chinese-internet-insult

My enemas are pretty simple. I am a FFer so I want and need a deep, total cleanout. I want my ass clean for 12 hours if need be.
use a fleet enema bottle. Just my preference. I use the larger size, there is a very small fleet enema that can be used but it requires several more bottles shot up my ass. The larger size 5oz is quicker. I shoot 4 of those up my ass. I then get down on all 4's. I then drop down on my shoulders while keeping my ass high in the air and let that water run deep in my colon. Trust me, this will take practice as you will have the major urge to release it.
For the sake of keeping your bathroom floor clean, STAY NEAR YOUR TOILET! You will have a major urge to release but it will subside if you can hold it. I then stand up and shoot 4 more(another 20oz) of water up me and yes it gets really hard to hold it in but I once again get down on my shoulders, ass up and let that water run deep in my colon.
By that point I am SO FUCKING ready to release. It feels so good to plop down on the toilet and let that eruption go from my ass. I feel like it cleanses my soul!
I gently push all the water out. BUT IN NO WAY AM I FULLY CLEANED OUT YET. The worst has yet to come out and needs to be lured out. That nasty shitty water that if not cleaned out will likely come out while later getting fucked.
Inserting a dildo makes quick work of luring out all of that shitty nastiness. As deep as you can take the dildo will lure out the water faster. Any good bottom at that point should be inserting a dildo, just for hole prep for fucking. It is a good way to open up your hole anyway, to get it ready for a good hard cock pounding.
But it also serves the purpose of luring out that final shitty water. IMO I can't get that dirty water out unless I insert a dildo for a few minutes. While I insert the dildo, I hold it in and brush my teeth, shave etc and get ready for the shower. I leave the dildo in for at least 10 minutes while brushing teeth etc. I pull it out and out comes the remaining dirty water. One more quick fleet bottle to rinse and into the shower I go.
It takes me 10 minutes to enema and push it out. Another 10 minutes or so of dildoing to get the water out while prepping, shaving etc.
I can be fully enemad, showered and out the door in under an hour and be 100% confident of my hole being clean for up to 12 hours after the enema.

b-bump?

So, they got this one right? Hillary was scarier than Trump, and a better liar.