US police arrest left-wing protesters, far-right blooms

Might have to go down to Charlottesville and get myself arrested.

My eyes are bloodshot red from crying for the past hour. Like why are white supremacists even a thing?? Don't white people have it easy enough already? Why hate the immigrants coming to enrich your country? Why hate black people when black people haven't dont anything to you? :/

Only if you compare it to CNN.

don't you have anything better to do than false flag

You're bad at this.

Weak bait, Holla Forums.

This is not at all surprising. Right wing media in this country is using events like the Battle of Berkeley to push a narrative in which leftism=inherent violence. Since the police and armed forces in America are bastions of reaction, that narrative works easily. Conservative media now portrays itself as the rational, pacifist alternative to radical, violent leftism. I fear that more suppression is coming.

I just remembered that Chris-Chan lives near Charlottesville. We should try to convince him to go to the protests and get his ass kicked.

Don't act like borugie media isn't gonna boruge in capitalism.

I'm sure a police department in Virginia will arrest a right wing protester any time now…

Just… Any police department… They're gonna arrest one of the reactionaries… For something. Anything.

Any time now. Just you wait.
They can put them in a cell with the hundreds of jailed leftists, it'll be fine.

Does this surprise anyone?
marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm

Weimarer Republic
Political Murders from 1919 - 1922:
Murders in total: right 354 - left 22
unpunished: 326 - 4
confessing culprits unpunished: 23 - 0
confessing culprits promoted: 3 - 0
detention time per murderer: 4 months - 15 years
executed: 0 - 10
fine: 2 Mark - -

Let's hope we don't go the way of Weimar

But we are.

???

CNN isn't good, but it's no worse than any other American bourgeois media source.

Friendly reminder that the US is nowhere near ready for socialism and will need a brutal civil war and purge with at least 10 million dead reactionaries and the complete destruction of the white supremacist apparatus before it's anywhere near ready.

Yeah, exactly. Al Jazeera is not good; every other major news source is just a total fucking disgrace.

The "white supremacist apparatus" is not a concern. The cops and the mercenaries are.

Yeah exactly, the white supremacists
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1923_San_Pedro_maritime_strike
libcom.org/files/1924 K.K.K.pdf

You're legit retarded.

al jazzeera is owned by the Qatari royal family who deliberately markets its English language version to libtards. The Arabic version just straight up demands the death of all shia and non sunnis

Only if what their covering doesn't concern the gulf states

...

I hate it because liberals literally would rather give someone who wants to murder and enslave people a political platform than actually confront those ideas in a meaningful way

Free speech to explain why balkanization is preferable to the forced replacement of white people, and to persuade whites to vote against illegal immigration. Hillarious that you leftists have no idea how to form a coherent argument against any of this, and instead have to resort to setting strangers' cars on fire.

It's not us pushing a narrative. It's just you being violent and then making excuses for it.

Thanks for proving my point for me.

"Free speech" is code for white nationalism.

No.

It's just that, unlike liberals, we understand how fascism operates and don't naively cling to liberal pluralistic values thinking that alone can ward off the threat of fascism.

I come here to read retarded shit like this, Holla Forums never disappoints.

Damn right it is. Freedom is a white nationalist ideal.

plz go back 2 reddit

I hope you faggots realize he wasn't being literal and just referenced your own autistic meme

I don't mean in general you retards.

I'm saying that, in this socio-political space and time, "free speech" is being used as a dog whistle for white nationalism, not that the concept of free speech is white nationalist.

If experience thus far has shown, it's quite the opposite. One of the first things to happen in any space that white nationalists take over is that free speech is eliminated. Look at fucking Holla Forums.

Our meme is correct. His meme is also correct. What policies would you consider "anti-racist"? Forced integration and a massive welfare state combined with mass immigration? Typically the word doesn't involve actual racial animosity. It's more about white people acting in their interests. That's what "racism" means now.

I don't blame you. Fascists gain power through open debate and free discussion. And since people like and respect our ideas, your best strategy is to censor us. It makes sense.

I'm not sure if you're still suckling at the teat of liberal ideology despite being a fascist or if you're still operating under the impression that invoking liberal ideology is going to have some kind of effect on us.

Maybe you guys aren't so different, Holla Forums.

Sure it is. The concept of free speech involves allowing all ideas to be expressed, which includes white nationalism. But only a nazi (or nazi sympathizer) would allow a white nationalist to express their opinion, and they need to be bashed or something.

The first amendment was written by white nationalists.

This is a concept within liberal pluralism, and white nationalists are pretty far from pluralists. You're using this bit of liberal ideology to further your own ends, you have no real love or loyalty for it.

I thought you guys wanted a white ethno-state. Now people who supported literally shipping black people into the country count as "white nationalists"? Is it because the blacks were slaves? So multi-ethnic States are okay so long as "lesser" ethnicities are confined to a servile status?

How quickly white separatism becomes white supremacy.

I figure I might as well use the term fascist since that's what you'd call anyone who doesn't support illegal immigration. I certainly identify with some liberal principles like freedom of expression, being able to live your life the way you want, property rights, freedom of association, etc. I know it's not going to have an effect on you of course, since leftists are authoritarians.

...

...

When did I imply all blacks should be deported? I used the first amendment as an example of white nationalists endorsing pluralism.

Like what leftists do? Sure. In a predominantly liberal society you have to do some amount of pandering to liberalism. Otherwise people get scared. But I do genuinely support some liberal principles, as long as they're not being used to promote demographic replacement of white people.

But yes, you pick and choose the bits of liberal ideology you like so far as it furthers the cause of white nationalism, but you have no real love of the ideas and principles that form the foundation of liberal thought.

As I said before, it's a way of giving a space to illiberal racialist though by appealing to those liberal ideals.

But far-right nationalism has never utilized a politics of debate. It's a politics of hysteria, sensationalism and outrage. You simply want to create the space to propagate it.

Not that poster, but

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who,_whom?

Even avowed liberals don't really care about muh liberal principles and muh free speech, given the widespread support among liberal centrists for "hate speech" laws, which exposes liberal hypocrisy for what it is

Oh you mean because the founders were white supremacists? Well there you go. Just because someone is a white supremacist doesn't mean they're illiberal. Same goes for white nationalists.

He said on the board where the majority of posters would unironically agree that "democracy" as we know it is just a pressure valve to vent the proles frustration with capitalism into cosmetic-at-best economic/social reforms

Leftists are the ones openly saying white people need to be replaced, so I don't see any sensationalism on our end.

Until the mid-20th century, it was literally just a protection for politicians and public figures, not proles.

...

Wew there lad.

Still better than being forced into a struggle session over a relative lack of devotion to Dear Leader, though

Those two things aren't contradictory.

You might want to check your smartphone DeAndre, I don't think we're living in the 1920s

...

I'm pretty sure Marx never argued that reasoned, enlightened debate would see capitalism whither away peacefully.

I know I can't guess at your specific politics, but if the general vibe of this board is anything to go by I'm sure it leans towards violent revolution as the ultimate solution

To be fair it is a mystery how successful violent Leftist revolutions inevitably become authoritarian police-states

They're literally a far-right nationalist ethnostate.

...

Well it's not like the USSR and China were much better.

What is the Marxist explanation for why revolution happened in backwards agrarian powers instead of the advanced industrial nations (as Marx expected)?

Were those helicopter memes invented only a few days ago?

...

Except they were better. The North Koreans are just nationalists.

And it was because those backwards feudal societies were collapsing and thus ripe for change.

So Marx was wrong and the peasants had the most revolutionary potential, not the workers?

I don't see how this is relevant considering that the Left has never pretended to be liberals or engaged in dog whistle politics.

Most communists will openly admit to being communists and will openly state that the only road to socialism is through violent revolution.

Marx had admitted later on that peasants had revolutionary potential after studying peasant communes.

Then why bring up MUH POLITICS OF DEBATE as if it means anything? As with the "hate speech" scenario even your average liberal has a subconscious understanding that politics is about violence (whether it's beating some idiot with a MAGA hat to "protect undocumented immigrants from potential violence", or wholeheartedly endorsing German cops busting down doors to arrest grandmothers making Facebook posts wistfully yearning for the days when their neighbours weren't shrieking in Arabic or Pashtun)

Its to point out that you're being disingenuous.

You know and we know that politics is about taking power over the material conditions that govern our lives. But you're playing this game of pretending to care about rational debate, but we know that's just shit you're feeding the libs.

That you want a space in the public forum is understandable, but it stands in direct conflict with our interests and we aren't so naive as to eat up the "free speech" line like the liberals. You don't really care about free speech, it's just a slogan and white nationalist dog whistle. What you want is a platform to spread your ideology.

To the Left everything's a fucking dog whistle, conservatism in a nutshell is "I hate [minority group]" you fucking paranoiacs. It's hilarious that Haidt's observations in The Righteous Mind are so fucking true, liberals (and their disillusioned-liberal friends in the "real" Left) really don't understand conservative motivations for anything.

inb4 you think you've lawgic-trapped me into conflating conservatism with white nationalism, it's not like you don't believe conservatives aren't just closeted white nationalists anyway

So does everyone.

Really gets the neurons firing

I think the core thought behind right-wing politics is that there's some kind of harmonious "natural order" that has been corrupted or deviated from, typically the doing of some malignant outside force, and the drive is to return to this natural order, usually by overcoming the outside force.

Is this wrong?

And THEN I realize this thread is just shit overall. Sorry for the bump.

So what's your motivation?

...

It's you fucks that derailed it.

...

The whole point is that the Left isn't fooled by your little charade.

Exactly.

Our point isn't that we're somehow more moral or liberal than you, it's that we see your game

KILL ALL COPS

Copcucks are the worst.

This is why you shouldn't get your history education from meme images on anime forums.

Cops and white supremacists have always been in cohorts.

this guy gets it

0/10

It's literally not happening outside of the minds of the right. Shaun and Jen went into the statistics and found that "White replacement" at current trends would take over half a millennium.

You're just creating a narrative to bash on minorities.

You're literally making up a narrative that non-whites (apparently literally everyone that isn't anglo) are being replaced by minorities so we need to push them out of the country and engage in eugenics against them.
Yeah, it's us who are the "violent" ones defending our communities against right wing psychopaths.

Cahoots

christ how dumb are they, motherfucker IT'S THEIR JOB to come when you get robbed
if a grocer sells me diseased meat that doesn't mean I won't buy groceries ever again

nigga you better be joking

It's literally fad politics, the same exact shit happened in reverse while Obama was president.

Most Americans don't actually believe in anything beyond the vague patriotic slogans they grew up with. Radical politics in the US are literally LARP.

Your troll-fu is weak.

Chris-Chan makes me ashamed to be a human

I'm autistic and I love CWC. People assume you have strength of character simply because you aren't on his very low level.

"OMG NAZI POLICE KEEP OPPRESSING ME I WAS JUST TRYING TO USE VIOLENCE TO INFRINGE UPON THE RIGHTS OF MY FELLOW CITIZEN WHY U DOING THIS!?!!??!"

mandatory

you mean the 10 million reactionaries will wipe YOU out in a couple days?

...

Hey if you are too thin skinned and easily triggered and have violent outbursts over something someone says then that is on you. The far right has been playing the left and the left has fallen into their trap mainly because the lefts methods are outdated in the internet age.

Well explaining why murder and slavery is morally abhorrent is a far more meaningful that random acts of violence. And guess what, most people in the west would agree that murder and slavery are morally abhorrent and it would take a civilization ending catastrophe for them to abandon those morals.

The contradiction manifests itself.

...

Most people aren't bothered by murder and slavery so long as its at a distance and especially if it is in some way officially incorporated into the status quo.

The Charlottesville protesters were non-violent you massive retard. These guys weren't antifa.

Ook ook

Read the article, dumbass. Or, hell, at least the OP.

The people being investigated aren't antifa and they weren't violent.

Never said "antifa" in any of my posts, did I dumb-dumb? Also, no such as a nonviolent leftist these days according to most, so don't expect any sympathy. You dumb motherfuckers dug your own grave, bragging about how "bad ass" you are while alienating damn near everyone that isn't some dunderfuck Marx lover (basically, everyone).

The absolute best part of it all? Holla Forums, those guys you hate so much yet constantly imitate, they saw this shit coming. They've been laughing their asses off for months now, cheering every time one of you blockheads sucker punched one of their fashy golems.

So, yeah, y'all niggas retarded.

Most people are far more concerned about Trump than lefty protestors.

Don't take the actions of police as some kind of reflection of public opinion. The police have been in league with reaction for as long as they've been an institution. Southern cops have historically had many ties to the KKK.

First of, it doesn't matter if it's true or not. If your side says whites should be replaced (what else does "diversity" mean?) then I'm going to blow it out of proportion. It's your responsibility to not be idiots and spew deeply triggering and problematic hatred that only serves to support my narrative.

Second of all, IT ALREADY HAPPENED. You already did to California, and many other places. APOLOGIZE.

You better be trolling.

Ok nevermind, you are trolling.

NJ now views "antifa" as a terrorist organization, and I'd be pretty shocked if it were the last state to do so. While everyone that I've met that has a liberal bias has mentioned their "concern" over the Tump administration, everyone else, bias or no, is at least annoyed with leftist violence. Even moderates are sick of your shit.

...

Furthermore, have these people ever lived in a poor neighborhood? rhetorical, I know most of these tards haven't The cops don't give a shit if you're robbed. Often times they'll turn the tables on you & give you a hard time once they come. Many don't even call the cops when they need them, for this reason.

Funny how you mongs engage in everything you accuse the left of.
Seems you're getting baited by trolls. Learn to differentiate between trolling & serious conversation.
Are you serious? How did you find your way to this board? Use the dictionary.
How are you not doing exactly this?
All leftists aren't a monolith.
All of this projection from you is amazing to read & I sincerely hope you're not this stupid.

You said the protesters were violent. That poster is simply pointing out that according to your shitpost, you hadn't even read the article. Stop shitposting & be honest if you want to be taken seriously(but judging by your original post, though, that's hardly what we could infer).

Yeah, I definitely read the article, but did you read my posts? Doesn't seem that way. You know, if you want to be taken seriously around here…

As crisis looms the first world will turn to fascism. America is not alone here.

Christ, yes, that's not violence. You're really grasping to fulfill your narrative. People shouldn't be arrested for heated arguments. Who's the fascist here?

If you just want race-blind economic leftism you're not relevant to modern politics. You have to either force it on white people that don't want it, or you have to replace them with people who do. A permanent white majority would be a death sentence for economic leftism.

You call it idpol. Every race looks at any given political issue and thinks, how does this affect my group? Why do Asians support open borders but not affirmative action? Idpol can only be avoided in a racially homogeneous society.

And are they not being forcibly replaced? I can literally look outside and see them getting replaced by state force.

Literally retarded.

How about you address the things I actually said?
So, idpol. You're so deep into it you cannot see anything otherwise. Sounds like a completely personal problem.
No, they are not. What window are you looking out of? Are you capable of having any conversation without memeing? Do you have any concrete "principles" or do they always change to be contrarian or self serving?
Like said, literally retarded.

How about you lurk on this board & observe how people actually talk about politics instead of nonstop memeing.

You people are hopeless. The implication of a mob is "all of these people are gonna beat you up," there's a threat of violence. The bitch's willingness to get physical and shake this guy demonstrates the ability to act on that threat. Threat plus ability equals assault, which is a violent crime.

The world isn't really so scary, user. You should step outside more often.
No surprise you guys defend cops for shooting unarmed people dead, no matter the race, because the cop feels "threatened". The ultimate "cucking" to authority. And you guys call us pussies. Also, threat of violence =/= violence, which was exactly my point. Stop pearl clutching & actually stand up for what you believe in.

I'm not even saying I agree with the lady or what she said. Just pointing out your willingness to lie to be able to shitpost or further your narrative.

What did he mean by this?

...

This is the modern conservative narrative that you see all the time, simply everywhere: "He said something/did something that I subjectively decided to interpret as a Threat of Future Violence so I could do whatever I want to him to prevent the violence which I assumed/instigated. I'm really the peaceful one, really I'm the victim!".

...

WEW
E
W

I just asked you for some proof, mate. Shouldn't be that hard to find if that's the legal definition.

Hurting feelings is violence now according to Trumptards.

legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/assault

leftypol can't even Google!

I don't see why you couldn't have done that in the first place, but thanks.

Oh you don't like when strangers who hate you and don't understand your culture want to hang around in your space and do nothing but agitate? What are you a nazi?

...

Because if he said that what they did follows the legal definition of assault and backed it up immediately, allowing for more thoughtful discussion on how the law should and does interpret domestic violence, then he wouldn't be able to be smug and shitpost incessantly

further proving that the state and its lapdogs will call anything they dont like "assault! violent meanie words! crime! wrongthink!" so that they feel justified retaliating with violence. thank you.

Now, if your definition was actual violence, you'd have some point. You're continuing to reach here. Funny how you did such mental gymnastics to defend how a granny did something violent, lmao. I hope you see how petty that is. Also, when you get to the point in an argument that you're backing into just defining words, that's the definition of reaching.

Every time Holla Forums comes here, or anyone goes to Holla Forums, that's the level of discourse to be expected. Make your own, personal arguments, for once.

I'll take that as a "no", then.

He's still not able to smug, though. He's just showing everyone even further how much he'll reach to defend his shit position & avoid thoughtful discussion, as you said.

Americans have this perversion of politics that "right wing = freedumb" so they dont see the danger. Their minds are filled with anti communist propaganda from the cold war and communist boogeyman is what they still fear.

C-Chris Chan

what happend?

...

You could at least try

This is just from nine days ago.
devonlive.com/woman-who-reported-stalker-125-before-she-was-stabbed-rejects-police-apology/story-30415635-detail/story.html
washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/07/01/a-woman-called-the-police-about-her-stalker-125-times-then-he-stabbed-her/?utm_term=.cdbcc313ddff
plymouthherald.co.uk/stalker-stabbed-woman-in-graveyard-after-she-reported-him-to-police-125-times/story-30415727-detail/story.html

YES. This is a great(but horrific) example. They severely drop the ball on stalking, protection orders, etc. The same thing happened to that girl who's ex doused her in gasoline in a phone store she worked at & lit her up. The judge had refused to reinstate a protective order, just a couple days earlier. She lived, but is now extremely disfigured. Was on Oprah a while back.
I have had some terrible experiences with cops as well, though luckily I didn't die. Anyone who's called 911 knows how dogshit they are. I fucking hate 911 dispatchers. You're in a terrible situation & they cop an incredibly discouraging/inappropriate attitude.
I've been robbed, had a gun pulled on me, been raped(not looking for pity here, last thing I want tbh); many things. The cops didn't do shit. They didn't even try to recover the possessions or do a proper investigation with the robbery(if my family were rich they surely would have). With the gun being pulled, they didn't even go after him. Instead they ran our names/info to see if we had any records. I actually posted about that incident in the /leftytrash/ thread about a week ago. Still fucks with me & that was 15 years ago. I didn't even bother calling the cops for the last incident which happened only a couple of years ago.

You're really on your own in this world.

Wew there lad.

The governor of New Jersey has a 7% approval rating. Antifa could run against him and win.

lol there's a recent case in which a woman called the police for help and got shot and killed by them

What thoughtful discussion? Me making points and you fucks throwing your flavor of Holla Forums buzzwords at me?

This assessment based on, what? The time I pointed out a violent crime was a violent crime? Assault is a violent crime, how is this even a point of contention?

No, it's literally not violence.

That assault may technically be viewed as appearing to threaten violence doesn't make any of what happen an actually violent act.

"Assault" is usually interpreted as physically attacking someone.

That they defined "assault" vaguely enough that any possible threat of violence could be viewed as assault doesn't change this. It's just legalese.

Christ, you really cannot admit or give even an inch that you were wrong to claim violence. There was no violence. As I said, the US penal code is extremely overreaching, as well. They've even made laws where it's illegal to protest in any effective manner. They can look at all of your private info without a warrant. The police routinely either don't follow laws, or bend them to their will, mainly in the favor of those whom pay them well enough. Considering this, it makes no sense to go to such lengths to defend these practices, if you're genuinely concerned with "freedom". This standard for assault allows them to jail anyone they wish, even if it's a simply heated argument.
You're actually posting in all caps like a child whom cannot make a point or post without memeing or throwing a tantrum. Calm down & actually be coherent. If you want to use this board for political conversation, you're going to have to do so if you don't want to laughed at or be banned for shitposting, which I can assure you, will happen. No one has time for that. So if you want to stick around, I suggest taking the stick out of your ass.

That's battery, actually.

Legally, it's violence. Legally, violence is either the use of force or intimidation through the display of force. I am not interested in the "philosophical" definition of violence, at no point did I reference anything besides the legal definition of violence.

Thanks for playing, son.

They did more than that. They made "assault" a different category of crime than "battery." Unless a suspect is charged with battery, then in it is unlikely that he actually did anything physical to the alleged victim. "Assault" is also different than "assault with a deadly weapon." Legal jargon is complete gobbldygook.

Who gives a shit about the legal definition?

And don't bullshit, you're clearly trying to conflate the legal definition of violence and what most people mean by violence colloquially so that getting into a heated argument turns into a physical attack.

"Legally" is not the same thing as "literally." The legal definitions of words do not match their actual use.

I want to fuck that boat

You're complete garbage. Just don't go crying in the mod thread when you inevitably get banned for shitposting.

Literally everyone that follows the law.

And you're clearly trying to make a case for why its totally okay to use violence as way to shut down opposing views.

& offer you*

...

to be fair the majority of calls received by police where a woman is complaining about a protection order violation, stalker, or someone otherwise threatening her turn out to be nothing more than a false report brought on by an emotional, vindictive woman who thinks she is clever. And the person who gets arrested because of her winds up getting dragged through the mud until the police inevitably find out the woman was full of shit to begin with.

I got a job as a police dispatcher, with the intent of being 'in the know' and thus being able to blow the whistle at every opportunity. And, I hate to admit it but most of the time such calls are bogus so its "understandable" that police get less than enthusiastic to arrive as prompt as possible to deal with some crazy woman on the rag.

That's a dangerous notion you have there. Deciding that rough and unwanted physical contact isn't assault is only a hop skip and a jump from saying "it wasnt rape because she had an orgasm"

No, that's not being fair.
Something tells me you're full of shit.
>>>/gulag/
Even those "bogus" women could be in need of assistance. What a cop-out.

She didn't shake him.

He claimed that she shook his chair.

From the article
No physical contact was made, yet she was charged with battery & disturbing the peace(while the white supremacist wasn't).
You're not fooling anyone.

So you're saying that drinking 40 year old Scoth and smoking Cohiba Behike would have been Holla Forums approved?

This is about as convenient as prejudice + power = racism.

Having some degree of taste would have been Holla Forums approved.

Frugality isn't an excuse here. He could have gotten a much better beer than Bud for the same price.

the chair that he was sitting in.

Ya know what. This kind of crap, along with the behavior of the left in general.. I wish I could agree with Holla Forums at least they tend to be behave in a reasonable manner.

Tf are you talking about? We're dealing with trolls. Don't cry when you get caught in the middle of others' shitposting. How about you go after those who are trolling, if you're sincere in your intentions.

Clearly the larger issue here is that police are targeting lefties or protesters, while leaving the rightists completely alone, because they fellate the state. That's where the attention should be going in this thread. Are you concerned about that at all?

Also
Lmao, go to Holla Forums right now & try to have a reasonable conversation. You've never been there if you believe this.

It's because on Holla Forums they all enforce his safe space mindset. Hence reasonable.

Yeah the record levels of young people supporting, joining, and engaging with leftist politics has been just brutal. The constant chanting of Jeremy Corbyn's name and his skyrocketing popularity keep me awake at night. Seeing Le Pen, among a host of other Right Nationalist reactionary elements, meet failure and humiliation at the ballot box, wow, it's really taken me aback. I can't help but feel light headed when I see Bernie Sanders' universally high approval ratings, to say nothing of the gains in Rojava, or this recent initiative by the Zapatistas, or the resurging presence of the left in general around the world as the grim rhetoric of capitalism grinds millions of people into the dust and leaves the survivors embittered and turning to increasingly radical left solutions and rhetoric. It's simply been a nightmare, defeat after defeat. My god.

What will we do with all this losing? ;~;

Seriously though, it's funny how we're somehow both "irrelevant" yet "taking over everything" at the same time, right? Fucking revisionists/propagandists.

"Reverse Racism is REAL!" - Holla Forums

There's no such thing as "reverse racism". Only racism. No need to muddy things up intentionally.

What this user said.

Racism is just an attitude.

...

white supremacy stills exists in america

...

Sounds like you should go buy a Limited Edition BLM Shirt and Mug. Holla Forums Approved Consumerism.

Go away.

No, it's pretty obvious. If they don't crack down on counterrevolutionaries then they get too much alphabet soup and get over thrown. If the US would just leave the new leftist governments the fuck alone, then some might actually live up to the ideal and survive.

Must be why Whites are discriminated against in Government, Corporate and Educational institutions in favor of non Whites.

go home Holla Forums

I thought it was the defining quality of White People.

Then again, which country is?

Have another one.

Read Umberto Eco's essay on ur-fascism. Enemies being simultaneously pathetically weak and utterly invincible is one of its canards.

Well that's part of the whole world revolution thing. If it succeeded in several European countries, foreign interference would have been much weaker.

...

More accurate to say Affirmative Action is more of a feel good PR tool. It exists to make money.

I'm honestly surprised Charmichael could say something like that and then turn into a rapid ethnonationalist.

It's worse even. The fact that the threat that these alt-right, racists groups pose is, by definition, unlikely to affect most of the 'white' viewers, means that it would not elicit a response even if covered properly. This is also why while attacks from right-winger racists against by-standers (a type of terrorism) have been on the rise but only the fleeting "terrorists" from the middle east are the only ones that are officially acknowledged.

Kek. Dead on.

You don't need to go any further than compare and contrast the punishment for those militia people who took over a nature preserve in Oregon with the treatment of Standing Rock pipeline protesters to see which side the system is on.

It doesn't just negatively impact whites and it has literally nothing that couldn't be fixed by getting rid of it, and doesn't even respond to user's post

Crusty/10

Yea, for Jews who benefit the most. And have the fucking gall to yell "White muh privilege".

The left supports the 1%.

There are racists hiding under your bed waiting to steal your kidneys.

Move to a non White area or country. All people do is bitch about "White Racists" yet always want to live with White people. Why is that?

Asians too. But never Jews who are "White" only when is suits their needs.

Identity politics is a cancerous tumor. Your parents should have put you down.

Yes, when Whites want to be treated fairly it's "Identity Politics" but not for non Whites.

The whole Left dogma in present day is Identity Politics bashing White people.

Antifa ring a bell?

No, poltics that are reliant on perceived identity are identity politics. This applies just as much to college liberal feminists and intersectionalist socialists as it does to MRAs and white nationalists.

Um, no.

theintercept.com/2017/01/31/the-fbi-has-quietly-investigated-white-supremacist-infiltration-of-law-enforcement/