Is their recent video Bad Mouse Productions phrases the increasing interest in Bookchin as the counter-counter-culture...

Is their recent video Bad Mouse Productions phrases the increasing interest in Bookchin as the counter-counter-culture to Paul Joseph Watson's notion that conservativism is the new counter-culture. It's an interesting notion, actually. With the revolution in Rojava, increasing interest in Bookchin has been slowly boiling up in the English speaking world. Were this to continue, the right might actually be in trouble, as communalists don't conform to the stereotypes that much of the so-called left presently does. It might mean the reemergence of an actually combative left, not seen since before the 1950s…

Thoughts?

youtube.com/watch?v=x_3Z52EwGeA

Not if faggots like BMP are forcing it.

...

Particular individuals spreading ideas is reflective of the wide reach of the ideas in question.

The takedown of the muh Venezuela argument was great.

Well, bookchinfags are already pretty fucking cancerous so they are perfectly fit to create some kind of counter-culture.

who the fuck watches 20 minutes of some furry rambling about their opinions

He should read Dauve.

I like Bad Mouse, but why do anarchist like defending a faggot that called all of the lifestylists? Bookchin was shit.

>And when I normally encounter my so-called colleagues on the left—socialists, Marxists, communists—they tell me that, after the revolution, they're gonna shoot me. [audience laughs, Murray nods] That is said with unusual consistency. They're gonna stand me and Karl up against the wall and get rid of us real fast; I feel much safer in your company. [audience laughs and applauds]

>Murray Bookchin, speaking to a crowd of anarcho-capitalists and other libertarians at a Libertarian Party Conference, depicted in Anarchism in America, directed by Steven Fischler and Joel Sucher (15 January 1983).

The dude in the last PragerU clip has a face that is far too small for his head.

What I meant to say was:
>I like Bad Mouse, but why do anarchists like defending a faggot that called all of them lifestylists. Bookchin was worse than shit.

To be fair that was when the reactionary, Hoppean strand of ancaps weren't around and when the reactionary Stalinist strand of Marxists were big. I can definitely see why he felt that way.

its too bad he's a jew since I like some of his stuff

Communalism is basically anarcho-communism for the modern age. Just re-branded to not attract the retard edgy smashies that fallow anarchism today

Also, Maoism was dominating everywhere in the left in the United States and destroying groups like the SDS

No sympathy. This was also during the period where neoliberalism was on the rise.

Considering the frequency with which modern Twitter tankies, Reddit anarchists and other armchair internet leftists call for the death of those they don't like, I can entirely understand this quote.

And which group gladly accepted that and started pushing it, socdem? :^)

ancaps and neoliberals should be killed tho


In the countries that matter (i.e. not Australia and New Zealand.)? Not socdems. Not even ex-socdems. It wasn't until the 90s that socdem parties were fully co-opted and purged of anyone left of Thatcher.

>Holla Forums will literally defend memechins collaboration with ancaps
I don't ever want to see you fags doing your lowest-common denominator ancap hate circlejerk again. The ancaps today are literally not any different then they were back and then. Ya'll don't really hate ancaps and libertards you just want an easy target.