Can you explain to me how Islam is compatible with communism please...

What do you mean? When FALC takes off, are you not allowed to build a building for people to come to pray once a week?

What is a radical Christian to you? The abortion clinic bombing in the 90s?

For fuck's sake, one day you will have to learn to take a clue.

Religion is a symptom; organised religion is another symptom.

When reconquista is complete and mass deportations start we should send every white Islam enabler to the middle east with their sand nigger pets. I'd love to see numale antifa cucks sold on the slave markets of Arabia as fresh castrasted eunuchs.

"Religion is the opiate of the masses."
Most commies, excluding the rare Christian communists, believe religion is a result of the material condition of the time under feudalism. Back then and even now it is used a false hope rather than focusing on reality, has terrible moral codes(I.E. Homosexuality is bad, you can rape women but you have to pay their father money then marry her, stone disobedient children, of which are all Christianity.), and have been used to do horrible things. Like the dark ages, the senseless destruction of progress, technology and scientific knowledge was due to religion.

Interesting, but borders are spooks anyways.

it isnt

t.ex muslim

If you start tricking people into submitting to hierarchy that's a little different than just having a building where people pray, isn't it?

The kind that enforces god's will through violence. Violence that takes place in the 2010s.

But if that doesn't count, if it doesn't get enough media attention or something, then this, it takes a truly disingenuous person to pretend like Islamic terrorism wasn't the direct result of America propping up those groups while ruining the region, if you did this to a Christian region it would produce very similar results as well.

Now it's the spectacle tbh

What's wrong with you?

None of those things really happen anymore and I'm pretty sure that rape is a sin. I think you are not addressing my original question, which is that if you hate religion why import religious people?

Literally the opposite of reality. The church was the foremost preserver of knowledge during the dark ages.

Most of the world is religious, it's compromise for strategic reasons in my case.

Furthermore most socialist countries haven't out right banned religion, just public and organized practice. So some would prefer religion to wither away due to the requirements of it disappearing, other out right ban it.

I agree, but I am asking (since it's very unlikely that Trump or anyone else will stop the war machine before America collapses) why then bring these people here?

Hail victory.

Have you read any of the posts here. We oppose it, but not because of idpol reasons. It exists to suppress wages and make the work force larges so workers have to compete with more unemployed. Porky likes it.

So that's why scientists were burned and killed because they threatened the ideas that the Earth was the center of the universe? Or that the Earth was flat? Huh.

And thank you for saying this, I was mostly focusing on religion and glared over that part.

Why allow Christians to stay? Why force them away? I'm not going to fucking spend my time defending your imaginary borders. That's just stupid. I have no investment in "here", "here" is the seat of the empire.

People are waking up. Anti-muslim anger is increasing, and eventually it will boil over. When that happens, will you side with the Muslims?

I don't understand your post.

Organized meaning that making tax-evading churches is illegal, right? Under communism, how would tax evasion be an issue?

You sound an awful lot like a first world prioritizing faggot you know that? "Workers of the world unite, hierarchically!"

… because you say it's not compatible with communism? Did I miss something here?

A particular religion has aims to take over western society, feminists and globalists are helping and then hope this particular religion will share in the the redistribution when the job is done. Sorry for the vagueness but I am not sure if this post is illegal in my country.

Churches wouldn't exist. The land would be used by others with some real purpose. You can still practice religion in your home. But this is what happened in most socialist countries, because we haven't had communism. Plus taxes were often quite low in most socialist countries, so tax evasion didn't happen all too often.

You did.
If I have to care about what religious people are living where, why should I let Christians on my continent?

UK?

Why not? If FALC takes off, why make a law against a group of workers building some wooden church/mosque/temple or even setting up a tent in their free time? This seems to me like an arbitrary restiriction, and by the way who would enforce this?

Well, assuming you can't just kill them outright, wouldn't you want less religious people in your continent?

Also, why would it be a problem for workers to build a mosque or something as opposed to a book club or a music club? Fundamentally there is not much of a difference with regards to organization and spending your free time pursuing whatever you wish so long as it does not undermine the collective ownership of the MoP

No, there's far too many of them, I'd prefer to declaw their religions and work on destroying capitalism while tolerating both temporarily. If you want me to stop tolerating Islam then I may as well stop tolerating Christianity.

Galileo was primarily persecuted for being a Gigantic Fucking Asshole (Pope: "Galileo my good friend, I'd like you to write a book on the merits of the heliocentric system you propose and the geocentric you hold to." Galileo: "here's the book. I named the geocentric arguer 'huge fucking idiot.'")
Also, that entire debate post-dated the middle ages and was well into the early modern period.
Did not actually exist to any degree for people of any education.

The church actively made copies of any classical treatises they could get their hands on, founded universities, actively funded scientists.

I will side with the proletariat. I will side with those who struggle for communism. Ethnonationalism and Islamism are just two varieties of Fascism. I want a third option.

How does that poster ensure that these building are not built then?
Well yeah, but you can't really do much about "tolerating" Christianity in your continent without outright killing them because post modernism is killing it as it is, but you can take measures against importing other spooked people into your continent.

If religion is the response to the material condition, which comes from a false hope for the more poor proletariat, or just proletariat, then why need religion?
And again, I'm referring to banning churches and such during the socialist transitional stage. Churches provide little to nothing to the community, produces no capital, so why is would it exist? Preferably religion will wither away after the material condition is eliminated. As for book clubs, they can exist to discuss philosophy, why would anyone not read philosophy at this point in time?

I'd also like to note how incoherent it is to claim the church was actively destroying knowledge and then turn around and cry about their adherence to Aristotle's cosmology. Shouldn't they have destroyed that?

Christianity is dead friend. You people constantly grasping for this false equivalence while your streets turn into Karachi are the fucking worst.

I hope you have a good Ramadan. You better hope the sand niggers don't get TOO hungry. kek.

You can't directly prevent people from worshiping in communism, it's more of an indirect consequence.

Fuck off kid.

This may be true but many kings and queens and members of the clergy were quite rich yet took their religion seriously. Do you think that King Salaman is a Muslim because he is living in dire conditions and needs hope? Moreover, many Churches in America are filled with middle class white folk, not at all the desperate and impoverished people from the Middle Ages, so I don't think your assumption is true (anymore).
Book clubs produce no capital either, how is a building discussing Plato fundamentally different from a building discussing the Dhammapada or the Bible or the Quran?

What's a Karachi?

Yes, but we will pretend otherwise because it's fun to watch autistic flailing from xenophobes.

let us remember how the shari'ah was reformed in soviet territories after women were given a voice

Religion will make a comeback under soulless neoliberal turbo capitalism or soulless FALC.
The soviets and chinks had to work very hard to remove religion and never succeeded.
The desire for people to beleive their life has more to it than eating, working, fucking, and shitting will never go away unless we lobotomise humans at birth.

And yet, religious fundamentalism remains rare in most post-tankie states. Chechnya is the exception and was caused mainly by Russia's severe socioeconomic regression after the fall of the USSR.

Culture and superstition are arguably inevitable, but religion as political ideology is not. It is a product of material conditions. Even ancient caliphates were more tolerant to non-Muslims than modern jihadis.

Can you address this post

If by "material conditions" you're referring to the lack of Saudi funded Wahhabi mosques.

"Material conditions" does not mean "poverty". It means things happen for logical reasons and assumes people aren't magical. Religious conservatism in the US is deeply rooted in anti-communist politics, for instance, and is thus related to maintaining the economic status quo, something many of them readily admit.

To exempt religion from sociopolitical analysis is to acknowledge it as the divine truth it touts itself as. It is a tool to maintain social order, and always has been, whether or not the schizos that wrote the holy books believed what they said.

See

You are forcing this discussion through an unhelpful liberal lens. Modern Islamic terrorism literally only exists because of the US and Western-backed monarchists. The KSA wouldn't even exists if it weren't for the Britcucks.