I'm Australian. Recently a renowned New Zealander comedian who has worked in our country since the 70s died...

In the comment section of your video. There are few things funnier than a bunch of virtue signalling neo-liberals publicly shitting their pants.

Why not try watching the video
He doesn't even go into the merits of gun ownership, just the bullshit reasoning people use.

No need. I've already heard a lifetime of neo-liberal whining about subjects they genuinely don't understand with appeals to emotion and going full feels over reals.
There is no reason required. That's the point. It's the Bill of Rights.

Holy shit OP, thanks for sharing, I love that the humor isn't "in your face" and is layered underneath commentary like a well frosted cake. I'll listen to these skits while i'm working today, i'm glad you showed these guys to me.

The fuck do you laugh at m8, Jeff Dunham and Amy Schumer?

I think you're on the wrong politics board

No, reddit, you're on the wrong board.

If you watched the video you'd know he doesn't even say that
He says he supports the amendment, he says that saying shit like "I want to protect my family from murderers" is retarded because who the fuck is coming to kill your family. He says, defend guns because you fucking like them, not for made up shit
But you're a typical amerilard who loses their mind at a foreigner making fun of your neurotic tendencies.
And by the way, it's liberals who want to ban guns, not neoliberals specifically. Neoliberalism is an economic ideology, trying to ban guns to control the working class is a simple capitalist approach - which isn't synonymous with neoliberalism.
Read a fucking book

This is witty, I like it.

th-thanks nazbol

gunfacts.info/

Come back when you've read all of that. "Gun control" isn't up for debate, reddit.

...

You couldn't have possibly read all of that. If you had, you'd know that your opening shitpost:
Was complete feels over reals bullshit.

He also goes onto criticise the NRA for saying, in relation to Sandy Hook, that teachers should have had guns.
It's about idiotic defence of guns, not ownership of guns.
But I'm not responding to Holla Forums bait anymore. Your flag doesn't even make any sense in relation to your posts.

Sounds like a reasonable position to me. Under capitalism, we give our fucking money armed guards, but not our children? Does that seem backwards to you? The NRA has a whole host of problems, like being resistant to NFA repeal due to big donors treating NFA firearms as investments, and being against the repeal of 922r, as again, many donors are invested in the US firearms industry which benefits from such import restrictions.
You really, really don't belong here, and you picked the wrong person to start a gun control debate with.
I think humans are inherently self-interested to the point that no political/economic system is immune from that degradation and corruption, thus the most "viable" system would be no system at all. I'd love to see a perfectly infallible communist (or even socialist) utopia, and I'm not going to get in the way of that happening, but I don't find either of those to be "realistic" outcomes. You could call me a disillusioned/blackpilled former leftcom. As for my support of the Bill of Rights, and specifically the 2a; from a selfish perspective, it is statistically the most effective means of self defense with the lowest chance of injury resulting in any confrontation, and I have the stats to back that up. From a macro perspective, arming the working class both lowers the overall rate of crime (criminals are more reluctant to, for example, burglarize someone's home in an area with high gun ownership), and also gives them a chance at a revolution succeeding.

This is quite funny, thanks for sharing.

shit, didn't mean to sage.