DSA answers the question

DSA answers the question

dsausa.org/wtf_is_neoliberalism_dl


pertinent because whenever libs are pushed their favorite retort these days is "neoliberalism doesn't exist".

These fags are cancer.

Someone should launch Deray on a rocket into the sun.

Fucking grifter.

Please stop supporting DSA. They are revisionists and will betray the left given the chance for power.

Go LARP somewhere else

We should just drop the "neo" part. It's literally just liberalism, and this word seems to give people the idea that neoliberalism is the "bad" version or whatever.

...

We went liberalism → Keynesianism/Social-Democracy → Neo-liberalism

People who talk about the problems with neo-liberalism as opposed to the problems with capitalism normally just want to go back to Social Democracy.

Wait, they actually do that? What level of denial is this?

Its unfortunate that illiterates have decided the word neoliberal is some kind of alt-right meme. I learnt about neoliberalism in university years ago and it was always criticised by progressive liberals.
I'll give some examples of rhetoric
In practice spending usually blows out, whether it be on welfare or the military.
In the U.S my understanding is that Carter began the process, Reagan went crazy on it and made it a political mainstay, as continued by Bush Sr. and Clinton was the first democrat to go full retard and embrace the "third way".
In the UK it was Thatcher who was the main proponent of this shit, even Reagan looks mild in comparison - by the time Blair comes in he has canibalised the Labour Party with his own third way nonsense.
In Australia the process began in the 70s but was accelerated massively by Hawke and Keating who were leading the charge as a Labor government while it was the conservatives in the UK and the US - they couldn't even act like they were continuing a trend like Clinton and Blair.
But I guess this Deray dickhead can't pick up a fucking book.

To me this whole mess really sums up why we should distance ourselves from """""leftists""""" i.e liberals - they aren't actually interested in politics. Politics is a web of things, and at least half of it is economics - it's inescapable - and yet they have no knowledge nor any desire to learn about it.
Holla Forums likes to pretend it is free of idpol, but even rejection of fascism and spooks is a social attitude.
Meanwhile liberals just say nonsense like "we should be a social democracy like Sweden" or "we should just tax the rich more and spend more on welfare"
Amazing economic strategies with layers and layers of depth and financial good sense that can't possibly be undermined by the broader economic framework or material conditions that make up the political economy.

Ever read Marx?

Conservatism with a progressive coat of paint, feminazis wrecking Occupy Wall Street with muh privilege checking bullshit, and Hillary Clinton wanting us to go to war with Russia.

Your move, black porky.

When you think the world is the US, so hard.

I believe it should have been "particularly minorities" which happens to be not caucasian in the west, so it's not so wrong.

It's an American party. Obviously they're going to speak on how it impacts American society.

Really makes your brain smooth doesn't it?

if you can't define neoliberalism after 40 years of neoliberal policy destroying the quality of life in da west you're a fuckin idiot.

seriously, anyone who doesn't understand this key concept has no idea what's been happening. You end up reactionary wondering which group/actually progressive movement to scapegoat for your brutal incompetence. which is what establishment dems have been doing nonstop.

race a spook.


If you are to define a socioeconomic system of global influence, focusing on one society is a mistake.

Reminder that DSA stands for: Dick Sucking Association

I would sodomize him. I can't be the only one.

Neoliberalism is the prevailing ideology of capitalism these days. It's hard to explain precisely because it is everywhere and claims to be "common sense."

The theory that the myriad of changes in the world actually were deliberately created by a few jews in a masterful scheme.

ZOG conspiracies are fantastic way to shuffle around the issue of capitalism I agree. However at the end of the day there are just as many goy neoliberals as they are jewish ones.

i love late capitalism. Its literally like living in the last circle of hell.

there are significantly more gentile globalist capitalists than Jews, there's however an overwhelmingly disproportionate representation of Jews in Finance and Global Capital compared to say Hispanics or Blacks or Arabs. They don't come close to rivaling Asians or White gentiles but they dwarf all the other, larger, major non-white ethnic groups. Which is worth studying and talking about. There is such thing as truth spoken from the lips of a demon, I don't think everything Holla Forums says is even vaguely true, but enough of it has some truth that its interesting how it got buried under nazism.

Doesn't change the believers in neo-liberalism ascribe the present state of the world to an all-purveying ideology, being everything yet nothing in particular, molded in a scheme hatched by a few jews to take over the world.

It's almost like… cultural marxism.

I would molest him and steal his molestation valour

Neoliberalism is the absolute emphasis on the individual and it's "needs".

Economicly it means less and less state and more power to the private sector.
Socialy it means less and less power to communities and more power to the "needs" of individuals. You know.. Like how Tumblr say you are all special and noone is allowed to make you feel bad with their commonly accepted truth…

this meme is basically a year old how is it still going on

but that's cultural marxism

"Cultural marxism" is a term passed around by right wing reactionaries that they use to malign neoliberalism without attacking capitalism. It's pretty hilarious how closely the two are related. The only way to save traditional culture is to embrace communism. Let go of the stupid conspiracy theories and stop sucking porky dick.

HELLO MY GOOD SOCIALIST COMERADES. I AM HEAR TO REMIND YOU THAT THE ONLY SOCIALIST NATION THAT EVER SUCCEEDED ECONOMICALLY WAS Not SocialisT GERMANY. GOOD DAY.

RIGHT OUT OF THE TRASHCAN!


raid better pol.

this one's 4 u bbq

...

Dead maoists are not that bad. The guy who killed him was a lumpenprole (yakuza) virgin like most of Holla Forums though, so that makes it not as cool. Also he killed himself like a fag.

"neo-liberalism" is a term passed around by left wing degenerates that they use to malign cultural marxism without attacking marxism. It's pretty hilarious how closely the two are related. Let go of the stupid conspiracy theories and stop sucking ratty dick.


When does an object become trash?

Your kneejerk response makes me doubt you can answer that question. This board needs more jewish users, at least they can grasp what isn't literal.

What an exelent argument!

Stefan would be proud!


Read Zizek.

Give two examples of an ideology?
What the fuck am I reading?

Reagan
Thatcher
Yeltsin
Pinochet

4.

c'mon how liberal are you?

Why read a lacan generator when I can read lacan himself?

Thats four examples of people who believed in neoliberalism. not "four examples of neoliberalism", that doesnt make any sense. jesus why is twitter a thing? this 140 character bullshit encourages people to write like retards.

...

because the lacan generator is still generating content, the other one is dead

I love how this idiot thinks that there is an ideological difference between Reagan and Thatcher and Clinton and Blair.

yawn