Communists are intellectual unlike those book-burning nazis, amirite?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

wnd.com/2005/06/31082/
cubanet.org/htdocs/CNews/y05/jun05/30e16.htm
amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2016/03/six-facts-about-censorship-in-cuba/
pando.com/2014/04/08/the-murderous-history-of-usaid-the-us-government-agency-behind-cubas-fake-twitter-clone/
refworld.org/docid/3ae6ad788c.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

no source

Sweet unsourced contextless quote bro

it's from a wiki article with this as source:
wnd.com/2005/06/31082/

also found it in here:
cubanet.org/htdocs/CNews/y05/jun05/30e16.htm

all weak sources

Nice CIA disinfo. Also the US Constitution is porky as fuck so no one should care if it gets burned.

TBH not a critique of communism so much of a critique of the Cuban system. I don't know much about Cuba but it seems slightly authoritarian since the presidency is passed on through familial connections.

Neither of these constitute actual arguments.

Of course concerning the net in Cuba
Six facts about censorship in Cuba

amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2016/03/six-facts-about-censorship-in-cuba/

Well its a good thing you've provided nothing to argue against faggot.

what was your argument again? that communists aren't intellectual because a court in cuba ordered some books destroyed?

Hmmmm

How about arguing against the notion of communistm not being any more intellectualist than nazism? Also, why do you use such homophobic term? Sound like a bigot, that's not a very leftist thing to say, isn't it?


I think that communism is no more of an intellectual's ideology than nazism.


What do you mean?

ok. that's not an argument though. it's an opinion

USAID has historically been used to affect regime change in countries that the US has deigned an enemy. I'm not surprised Cuba was hostile to the program.

pando.com/2014/04/08/the-murderous-history-of-usaid-the-us-government-agency-behind-cubas-fake-twitter-clone/

Nice strawmanning, faggot. (real) leftists aren't insensitive cocksuckers like the liberals.
Also, all this shit about "not an argument", we are not obliged to discuss based on your premises, attacking those premises are just fine, which you would know if you knew anything about intellectual discourse.

The common practice of book burning constitutes an argument.


Hitler believed jews to be a foreign element who posed a danger.


Lol, Soviet government made faggotry legal, dumbass. And you'd struggle to find a few communist parties not pandering to faggots' feefees with muh homophobia. Also, read response to

...

I think you mean, illegal

In 1933, Joseph Stalin added Article 121 to the entire Soviet Union criminal code, which made male homosexuality a crime punishable by up to five years in prison with hard labor. The precise reason for Article 121 is in some dispute among historians. The few official government statements made about the law tended to confuse homosexuality with pedophilia and was tied up with a belief that homosexuality was only practiced among fascists or the aristocracy.

The law remained intact until after the dissolution of the Soviet Union; it was repealed in 1993.

refworld.org/docid/3ae6ad788c.html

So much for the tolerant center!

...