… I have to ask: Was Jesus really a socialist?
Discuss, plz.
… I have to ask: Was Jesus really a socialist?
Discuss, plz.
Pope Francis pretty much told the wealthy to fuck off and leave the church.
He would have opposed privatization of the Commons, especially through primitive accumulation.
The bible and jesus supported slavery and private property and meritocracy
Jesus was a bourgeois fuckhead
Jesus didn't put you in jail for choosing not to give money to him for him to redistribute it himself to the poor. You had to voluntarily donate your money and you weren't forced to follow him. Therefore Jesus was not a socialist.
Holy fuck you are a fucking moron.
Who dresses you in the morning?
I haven't actually read the bible, but I'm guessing he advocated more for charity to the poor instead of remaking society such that the workers control the means of production. If that's true, that would make him someone who favors redistribution over revolution–a filthy social democrat!
youtube.com
sort of, at the least.
Keep in mind, the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, were written years after the supposed historical dates of when the events in it happened. That means a lot was either lost in translation or just plain pulled out of the assholes of the often batshit insane scribes who wrote them.
We can't trust the Bible alone to paint a clear picture of the historical Jesus for us. There's probably essays of shit in there that Jesus never actually said.
...
Based
A proto-socialist, but yes.
Not even close. Just some pacificist jew that wanted people to believe in him. Bunch of moralfag bullshit.
Where is a stirner pic when you need one..
Slave morality is proto socialist, since the right wing finds the prospect of not being able to inflict limitless violence on the "lowers" to be absolutely dreadful. It is quite literally the antithesis of their mindset, and therefore ought to be supported for the subconscious asspain generated alone.
He was a class collaborationist.
And he said it while messing around in his literally gold paved palace, which is why "the wealthy" didn't fuck off.
Why are people on this board so eager to swallow the pope's kool aid? He's a piece of shit like every pope that ever existed.
That nullifies the entire bible and by extension the entire of the Christian religions.
If there is no way to know for sure what is real and what isn't real in the bible then the entire thing becomes useless.
Jesus was likely just a utopian communalist.
the old testament and the gospels fit several indoeuropean mythological themes down to a T, I see no reason to believe any of it actually happened even if the sources were contemporary to jesus.
Faith is belief without evidence. If we knew for sure Jesus was the son of god, etc, it wouldn't be a religion but a historical fact.
Core tenet of The Didache:
"If you share what is everlasting, you should be that much more willing to share things which do not last."
Exactly!
Francis doesn't live in the traditional papal chambers and continues to live modesty. He's not going to tear down the Vatican because he's not a fucking moron
If that were true why are most Christian right wingers instead of Christian socialist? Checkmate atheists
Explain further
Oh wow I'm so glad the pope lives """modestly""", that changes everything.
It sure brings back all the priests he informed on and indirectly had killed for suspicion of leftist beliefs.
What else do you want me to explain? Francis tries to live humbly so he's not hypocritical, but also knows he can't take on an institution as powerful as the church even as its figure head. My point is the pope isn't the hypocritical one for telling rich people to gtfo(which I never heard about so I'm taking
at face value.) the church is hypocritical still but Francis seems like he does his best.
Thank u 4 ur contribution. Ur very smrt
He's using cheap shoes, not like the old pope who had red costly ones. Literally /ourguy/.
it's implied you go to hell if you don't do what he tells you, that's probably worse than prison.
Some say it's even worse than gulag, but only kulaks know for sure.
Jesus never existed.
The historical context of the second temple period, especially its late part, makes this claim disputable.
The few historians refering directly about Jesus at this period were either jewish or christians.
you are right He never left us
He was He is and He will be
anyway
CHRIST IS RISEN!
At the same time next month he will be in my country to visit one of the most retarded things you will read about from which lots of capitalists feat upon.
This pope is just markting that's all.
no
props mano
He sure as hell was, and Muhammad came after him to complete it
...