Can i be both leftist and a white nationalist?

Can i be both leftist and a white nationalist?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RLqymMBOq9E
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-anarchism
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No.

Not really. White supremacy runs contrary to the idea of abolishing classes through which violence can be enforced, although I guess simply advocating for spooky shit like White couples and so on would be no problem, nationalism will inevitably disappear over time, it doesn't really matter if you're in favor of it or not.

why? i stil have solidarity for non white workers, it's just that i have a hard time believing that every ethnicity is biologically equal

No. Why would you want to liberate the white workings class but fuck over even attack the working class of other races?

i don't

How are you going to removeing millions of nonwhites?

What the fuck does White Nationalism means for you?

segregation

define 'white'

racialism. tbh i don't really consider myself a white nationalist since i'm european

Yes. Be a Not Socialist.

do you expect people to accept segregation and the inevitable inequality it brings without it getting violent?

...

N A T I O N A L S O C I A L I S T

You can both things in the gulag.

how would segregation bring inequality in a classless system?

Well, you have the right of being leftist and believing in humoralism i guess.

Based on race you fucker.

how would two races living separately in the same classless society be unequal?

Yes. Take your seat on the left wing of capital like the most of them.

the segregation would only be temporarelly since when communism is established worldwide you wouldn't need any borders. people feel more compforable and rather be around people with similar traditions, values and customs, thats not a controversial statment.
without capitalism people wouldn't be forced to migrate so there wouldn't be any large scale demographic changing migrations.
so it would be a kind off volountary segregation

Roughly speaking:
- Leftists are either international liberals or international socialists.
- Rightists are either national liberals or Not Socialists.

But Hitler was a capitalist

How would segregation be enforced in a world without borders or a state?

Yes I'm sure the minority population won't get screwed over in anyway and land and resources will be distributed fairly without any violence.

not enforced, participated. people would choose whether they want to live in segregation or not

but there would be minority populations in a nonsegregated society too. what would keep them from getting screwed over then?

Capital has no nationality

He said white nationalist not white supremacist.

Try again.

This is true.

Im a nationalist and I hate socialists.

Short answer is no, long answer is absolutely no.

Calling Hitler a capitalist is kind of silly since the WW2 from the Germany's part was pretty much a rebellion against the financial capitalist system. That's what the whole corporatism was all about. That's why it was mainly supported by the industrialists.

Around the late 19th and early 20th century the industrial corporations had become large enough to finance their expansion from the profit generated from the production alone and no longer needed to take loans from the bankers. The international bankers noticed that they were about to lose their main source of income, so they started to grant loans to the socialist parties who wished to socialize the means of production from the industrialists. Those socialist parties also promised all sort of expensive welfare programs as well which are expensive and need to be financed somehow. The financial bankers saw an opportunity there. Since the industrialists were no longer reliable customers for their services, the international bankers found a new customer from the socialist governments. Obviously the international bankers didn't live in a country with a socialist government themselves, but rather financed the socialist political parties of foreign nations.

So in a way, the second world war was basically a war between fascist industrialists and liberal financial capitalists who financed communism. A lot of those international bankers were Jewish so that's why you got the whole antisemitism thing going on and also why industrialists like Henry Ford were so antisemitic.

I was meant to say "either national liberal or nazi" but apparently there's some word filter on leftypol that replaced National with Not.

...

And how does that work?

Yeah that is weird.

My friend is an old nationa1 socialist and he is the most socialist person I know.

The capitalists Karl Marx talked about were financial capitalists aka bankers. Adolf Hitler wasn't very popular amongst them because he wished to cut Germany out of the London-based financial system. That's mainly why the WW2 happened.

Must be why the Nazis privatized the four biggest commercial banks in Germany.

ok. you can go over here
ok. you can go over there

And how is this enforced? What if somebody doesn't want to leave the area being proposed as an all [insert skin color] area? How do you ensure that the xenophobic community doesn't have control of valuable resources that it uses to leverage against other communities?

it's up to them i suppose. how would you enforce it from not happening?

No. That's only a subcategory of capitalists. The basic example Marx used when describing capitalsitic relationships is the factory owner vs blue collar worker (granted not exactly in this term for it would be anachronic)

No fuck off

Jack London was both a Socialist and a White Supremacist far beyond that of cunts like Spencer.

Thats retarder
"White" is not a nation
Its just a retarded shit that amerifats came up with because they have no national identity

By fostering a society that enocourages mutual aid and solidarity for all members of the work class regardless of race. And by gulaging reactionaries who support idpol bullshit like you.

Yes, because that is the most godtier one.
Socialist benefits for only white people. All the subhumans out.

So socialism but without internationalism? Like socialism focused in one country? Dunno how it would be called, probably National ลšocialism or something like that

is that what western countries are doing today with multiculturalism?

So 99% of population?

Nice joke.

It just means hes a nationalist who happens to have white skin. You could have two friends, one white and one black who believe in nationalism. One would be a black nationalist and one would be a white nationalist.

Its a new label the media have come up with to make people feel bad about their skin colour.

Yeah, exactly. During the Marx's time the factories were mainly owned by bankers essentially, but half a century later things changed. The factories had to hire clerks to do all sort of paper work to make the factories more efficient. Those clerks ended up becoming the managers of the factories and suddenly the factories were no longer in control of the capitalists. The managers like the CEO usually run the show while the "ownership" is decentralized in the stock market and many of the "owners" only own a fraction of the "means of production". The point here is that the factories were no longer ran by an individual, often a banker, who managed them like a despot. That's how it still was during the Marx's time, but things changes as the so called "middle class" emerged from the factory clerks who ended up running the show and to some extend still do to this day.

Thats pretty retarded, nationalism is nationalism, doesn't matter if black white or yellow

+1

Neoliberialism is not international socialism.

Yeah but the idea is to subtly imply that a black or white nationalist is the same as a black or white supremacist.
To create more division and controversy that they can use to make money.

It's not a joke.

Why won't you understand that leftist ideas would be pretty good but you always have to ruin it by having such orgasms from bringing subhumans to ruin the society.

...

is international socialism going to permanently change the western world's demographics?

Factories had management in the 19th century. Regardless of that the emergence of a managerial "class" doesn't change the fact that private ownership is still the mechanism through which the bourgeoisie exert a minority control on government and accumulate wealth. Something the Nazis had no intention of abolishing.

...

Didn't mean to greentext that

Yes, there's nothing about leftism that inherently means freedom for all. I knew a guy who was a white supremacist anarchist.

Here's a song he made:
youtube.com/watch?v=RLqymMBOq9E

"But I have an objection
Cuz Blacks are the infection
And whites are the perfection
Itโ€™s not just complexion
Itโ€™s the natural selection
Time for insurrection
Time for insurrection!!!!!!"

anarchism =/= leftism

You can be a anarcho fascist just fine

Tell your friend to give up on music. This is laughable.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

No.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-anarchism

Holy shit stop posting in this shitty fucking thread.

Fuck, the question was answered correctly in the first fucking post.

The only 'discussion' possible after that is going to be Holla Forumsyps trying to push their idpol dogshit here.

We don't need

so it's going to keep millions of dark-skinned people from the third world settling in europe in order to exploit the welfare systems? count me in

Does this mean national-anarchism is the edgiest ideology around?

This. Stop taking the bait.

The answer is YES. It's called Not Socialism . So do that somewhere white and presto.

I SAID N A T I O N A L SOCIALISM

Nope, you had it right the first time, cocksucker

You mistook me for your mother

I mistook you for no one, cunt. Get the fuck out of here

cunt is your mother
and a cheap one, not worth its money

You keep going back to the mother thing. Iz zhere somethink perhaps you vant to admit?

its a new meme

exampled

OK well that's just gibberish. How come none of you nazis seem to be able to speak the Queen's English properly? I thought you had respect for your heritage.

because i'm not a queen you dam fag do not let the meme catch up on you , you'll be a bad nazi

It is amazing how diverse pol is compared to leftypol.

Seems about right

Oh shit man, now I feel bad. All this time I've been swearing at some poor retarded kid over the Internet.

Do you seriously not understand that when someone mentions 'the Queen's English' they're making a reference to the rightful Sovereign of the Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?

What kind of mongerel fucking spawn are you?

you mean ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€white๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ€, a concept that allows kikery to happen as long as it's being used

it's even memier than actual nationalism since it attempts to be scientific about the group it panders to.

Let me explain you something really really well you deep deep tard , โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ your mother's a whore


boy do you lil pussies flatter yourselves or what , might as well fluff eachother i can't believe a 'lefty' is basicaly a selfdeluded lord but unrecognised , someday someday โ€ฆ

Are you schizophrenic?
Because you sound like one

Seriously though, where are you from? English is obviously your 4th or 5th language. What makes you think you have any right to be on the 'white is right' side of this shitshow of a discussion?

I mean, unless you're a pureblood Anglo you really don't have any right to go around riding our coat-tails. We invented the system the runs the world, you filthy little european monkeys just tried to take the credit based on a shared complexion.

listen grasshopper the first step in your path to enlightenment is to take things out of their mold to examine what they are

ii'm not impressed by your mediocre effort. try harder,

Seriously, just name the general region that you're from.

I'll do the rest of the work in pointing out how you're just a worthless cuntinental trying to catch some of Rule Brittania's reflected glory with the made-up category of 'whiteness'.

no

It's called being a nazbol.
And It's retarded.

Lmaoing at your life
You could as well say that Japan is not asian

You look at things like a child.
This is pardonable in a lesser man, but a fatal flaw in one of your calibre ( I'm joking because your calibre, you've got none)

No.

The only thing Japan shares with China at this point is a continent.


Wow, you must be pretty ashamed of your country of origin, huh? Picking the 'I'm vaguely disappointed in you' defense is pretty weak.

Hey, at least your grammar's improved a little though! Good for you! Shame about your national heritage being so worthless you have to hide behind a uselessly broad label like 'white' though.

i have the right to wrangle my grammar as much as i wanna wtf , its MINE. Now where were we , oh yes, you say anglo and white , well lemme tell ya something you miss .. anglos are oink , they aren't white

oink oink pink

No. next question.

Maybe if they all dyed their hair pastel shades nobody would notice how everyone here is a white male.

That is diverse right?

No, fuckhead, descriptivist linguistics is pomo shit for dumb faggots who can't learn to communicate properly.

And if Anglos are indeed pink instead of white well then I'm still not a white supremacist - you worthless white sisterfuckers on the continent only ever followed along the trails we pinkos created.

No but you can be a conservative socialist. i.e. Asserist/National-Socialist.

S T R A S S E R I S T
fucking filters

European socialism when?

Since 1915

...

No. You can't enforce white nationalism without a state.

yeah you can just keep your racism under control and be polite with to others.

hopefully you'll be 15 soon.

I'm not shocked that a newfag is upset about feminism being shat on.

Non sequitur. If you read theory you'll stop being a white nationalist.


Seems about right

Yes, but please no genocide. The only practical realities for a white state is for a group of people to buy an island without natives and call it sovereign, or wait for space colonization and set up an ethnostate.

No one should have a problem with a small group of skintones wanting to live by themselves, as long as no one was living there first.

laughingwhores.jpg

Remember, COMMUN in COMMUNISM comes from community. Communism would mean the eventual abolotion of the state, and thus "nationalism" seems a bit of an irrelevant topic. But capitalism encourages the labor supply to leave their communities and go wherever there are jobs. In white nationalist speak, this mean you get "nonwhites going to white countries for jobs." In communism, they'd have no motivation for doing so.

This. Unironically, communism is what will "save the white race"

You're confusing communitarianism with communism.

Communism is the belief of collectivizing the manpower and property pool (under a dictatorship and killing anyone who disagrees).

...

The heck is that supposed to mean?

Nation and nationstates aren't the same thing

i don't really think you will have to once communism is established globally.
see what i wrote earlier

Read Zizek

Calm down my man. We aren't gulaging people for wanting to live in white or black neighborhoods. Autists can even start their own furry communes as long as they don't try any counter revolutionary activity.

People moving out of a home or moving in because MUH RACE goes against some core principles of socialism.