Is the trans movement 100% idpol cancer or should we as leftists take an interest in trap politics?
Is the trans movement 100% idpol cancer or should we as leftists take an interest in trap politics?
Sebastian Young
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
nature.com
emergencypsychiatry.org
thephilosophicalsalon.com
translucidcomic.com
yahoo.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
imgur.com
twitter.com
Lincoln Long
It's 99% idpol cancer. There are sane and reasonable trans people, but most are virtue signalling tumblrina faggots
Wyatt Reed
This basically
Camden Wilson
Honestly if we're talking about a purely medical phenomenon that requires an enormous amount of privacy not to publicly humiliate anyone who has it for laughs, it shouldn't be a political issue at all and the public at large should be discouraged from making it one on either side of the aisle.
This remnant of internet "look it's a lolcow" type 2006 ED shit and the reaction to it has done nothing but irritate everyone and shit on everything.
People are addicted to it politically the same way people are addicted to tabloids.
Gavin Cook
100% gulag material and anti revolutionare spies.
Landon Robinson
If their privacy is your business, what makes your privacy more important? Where is the precedent?
Parker Nguyen
the trans people are potential comrades, to be sure
its just the focus on idpol rather than class that makes a specific person a liberal rather than a leftist
there's a lot of potential material interest for transsexuals in a single payer health service, for instance
Evan Nelson
To be fair, I think there is a differance to me made between intersex people who end up going to surgery and taking huge amounts of hormons to change their gender and people who just "identify" as other sex by dressing up and applying makeup.
Liam Stewart
Do you have an ED page?
Alexander Cox
huh, is this a new american thing?
I personally can't relate emotionally to traps, faggots and other deviants
so I don't care really