Isn't communism practically a religion...

Isn't communism practically a religion? They want to take over the world through armed revolutions which gets millions of people killed in the process. How is it different from ISIS for christ's sake?

Honest question really.

Other urls found in this thread:

biblehub.com/matthew/6-24.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

No man dead or alive commands me I answer to the lord

Seriously?

Isn't capitalism practically a religion? They want to take over the world through armed revolutions which gets millions of people killed in the process. How is it different from ISIS for christ's sake?


Honest question really.

biblehub.com/matthew/6-24.htm

Not all communist ideologies must be marxist.

Not an argument friendo

nor is your op

...

What the hell kind of a definition of religion is that?

user, it's not that we want the blood to flow for the glory of Khorne, but simply because parliamentarian reformism never fucking managed to overcome the currently existing economic structures aside from giving us some half-assed solutions like welfare. That's because parliamentary politics force the politicians not to go too far with their demands.

Is this the peak liberalism I've heard so much about?

Liberalism makes sense. Communism does not.

not an argument

we will be as ruthless with capitalists as they are and historically were with us. remember the commune.

LOL by this definition liberalism is a religion too, the difference is that it actually has taken over the world.

fuck off facebook shitter

...

Communists will put you up against a wall and shoot you like a man instead of slitting your throat.

oh and ISIS makes pedophilia and rape legal, which communism doesn't.

Isn't Not Socialism practically a religion? They want to take over the world through armed revolutions which gets millions of people killed in the process. How is it different from ISIS for christ's sake?

Honest question really.

to the skies see carolus rise?

Another attempt for an argument on lefty

Also - communism doesn't need to have Marxist ideologies. kek

not all christians autistically shout Deus Vult then something about Constantinople

Mao was right

Liberation theory?

...

the getting millions of people killed is optional ya know. if everything goes our way we just need to kill the burgoeise.

I'd take a christian communist over an atheist liberal any day of the week.

As for the "Marxism is a religion" thing, anybody who even read the most basic Marxist text would come to realize that it's not, any more than any other social, political, or economic science is.

Who? Self-proclaimed internet communists?

lol are you saging your own thread now that you've been btfo?

How is it not an argument? The statement is posed exactly the same way and holds the same value.

This board is trash because of no IDs. Also, sage is not a downvote, my good goonsir.

Really makes you think…

...

Hmm…

liberation theology*

Wow, it's like they were the same family.

If we do the same with your lineage long enough it turns out you are an African.

GO BACK TO YOUR CONTINENT, YOU FREELOADER

It's funny because if you go back long enough everyone probably has.

your entire ideology rests on this non-argument. you are mentally impotent

Here's a question I've always wanted to ask a commie, How can communism be enforced without genocide? In a country in which everyone must adhere to the dogma at all costs, there is no other way to deal with dissent than with murder or imprisonment, and also, if you kill the bourgeoisie, and set yourselves as the all-seizing government, don't you become the bourgeoisie?

The idea is to simply kill all Whites so that we can erect Cultural Marxist utopia where Jews reign supreme, silly.

The proletariat does not need to commit genocide at all. Only those proletarians who are reactionary and who decide to wage a counter-revolutionary war will be attacked, and this will as shown in the 20th century, never be even close to an entire nation or ethnicty of them, let alone an authentic proletarian reactionary movement (was always enforced by a national bourgeoisie).

OP btfo with one simple trick.

i like u

I don't really see the point behind this question if you are in fact asking in good faith. Please explain a little further what the point of this thread is.

So, those who oppose it will be killed, that's not comforting at all since a signifacant part of the world will oppose it, forever, Can there ever be an actual proletarian only movement? The poor don't read and typically have more pragamatic and immeidate necessities, and in any organtization someone will have more power and wisdom (admiration), making them the burgeoisie.

Same with capitalism. Those who oppose it are killed. Capitalism and socialism are mutually exclusive; they cannot coexist for they are antagonistic to one another.
There have been many. Communism was once the most popular political ideology of the working class. See: the late 19th and early-mid 20th centuries. It took massive (para)military force to quell this.
That's not how class works. Hierarchy and class are furthermore not the same thing.

Are you sure? If in capitalism money buys power, thus the burgeoisie have the most, in a system in which the state controls the resoruces, wouldn't they have the same power as the bureoisie, simply exchanging money for bread? Have there been any communist movement that has not relied on capitalism? Aren't communist militias are privately funded?

What's funny is people don't give Nietzsche shit for having a father who is a pastor

READ A FUCKING BOOK I CANT TAKE LIBERAL ILLITERACY ANYMORE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Want to get redpilled about something leftycucks? I'll redpill you here and now

*Huffs paint*

...

What kinda definition of a religion is that?