Delusional hypothetical, fampai. We're not dealing with two completely separated hypothetical societies, we're dealing with society as it is. Maybe 1 in 100 people are gay. If 1% of the population either not reproducing or doing via sperm donors is an immanent and deadly threat to your race, then somehow I think that your race has bigger problems than the 1% of gays. Your posited social scenario has absolutely nothing to do with the real world, because nobody's arguing here about whether or not the whole world should be gay. We're arguing about whether or not gays should be allowed to exist in society, and your whole notion that somehow they shouldn't because it'll reduce white breeding rates is the most useless shit I've seen in a long time. "Nature" has nothing at all to do with it.
Dubious. Companies do stuff because it's profitable. There's no larger 🍀🍀🍀agenda🍀🍀🍀 here. If being openly racist was profitable, they'd do it. As it stands, minorities have been increasingly successful at making your brand of bullshit unprofitable, so they don't. You're still free to say whatever you want, or in this case scream about degenerates on an imageboard, but your favourite corporations aren't going to pander to your particular agenda anymore. Don't like it? Maybe you should get interested in abolishing capitalism to preserve genuine culture.
I'd suggest Adorno.
Any modern conceptions of "tradition" in our current society have been overwhelmed by cynical political re-appropriations, capitalist greed, and distortions by edgelords disconnected from it. You'll notice that a Holla Forumsack can never actually engage with tradition as the kind of organic, evolving entity you describe. The most they can argue is a bunch of screaming about "ahmed", grainy reversions to modernist pseudo-science, and decontextualized pictures of statuary devoid of any real meaning to them.
They may call themselves traditionalists, but they're not really engaging with what tradition means - the engaging with the fundamental morality, worldview, and value system passed down from previous generations. You can understand someone else's tradition, but you can't jump back to the mindset of a 1900s German bourgeois any more than a fat greasy basement-dwelling Westerner could really become a daimyo. Tradition, in that sense, is more than just knowing - it's a lens through which you view the world.
Maybe you're actually seeing the world through that particular lens, and if you are I admire that completely. But you can't really just "restore traditions" - when Goethe and the Romantics decided to defend German traditions and culture, they ended up with something quite unlike the 15th-century worldview they tried to revive. And when Japan went nutty and fascist before WW2 and tried to restore the Samurai traditions, what they got was something entirely different than the shogunate-era individualist warrior code. You literally can't restore tradition when it's gone.
lmao go back to jacking off to hitler pics