Can someone explain to me the point of fighting the Alt-Right when their goals help further our own?

Care to explain how their policies aren't harmful to capitalism?

Not a popular opinion here, but the real enemy is liberalism. The policies of the Alt-Right would actually cause the collapse of the system.

Great misunderstanding of the economic forces behind migration.

Workers have been migrating in large numbers since the industrial revolution. The immigrants of yesteryear are now the working class of today. The real problem is that immigration props up the bottom of the pyramid, allowing the system to grow. The exploited become the exploiters and the cycle continues.

What actual policies? The Alt right is nothing but idpol

The OP summed up pretty neatly the most common policies of the Alt right

That doesn't harm capitalism in any way. It's what Holla Forums and most of the right does every 5-10 years

I would say not having a massive and diverse reserve army of labour to break up unions is very harmful to capitalism

Because if we focus only inwardly the capitalists will simply flee to another part of the world. we need there to be no place for anyone to hide from equality.

Can someone even define what teh alt right is?

Protip, you cant just use the existing definition for the far right.

To achieve socialism one needs a high I.Q. Racially homogenous population. I think all reasonable people left and right should agree on that. The hordes are at the gates, there is no time for infighting, first things first, we establish a fashy white ethnostate, then we can debate about the merits of socialism and capitalism

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_trials#Intelligence_tests_and_psychiatric_assessments relevant

Actually, it does. For two reasons, firstly, populist movements are more or less vehicles of the public whim more so than platforms for the elite who started them. The Tea Party movement's base was made up of people violently opposed to amnesty, while those at the top would have rather given it for their own sake.

You see, most people don't sit around rigidly crafting their own ideology. The solid majority of people don't even see the point of bringing in immigrants to support capitalist ventures, when we have, in my country, over 300 million people anyway.

And if the illegals aren't a part of that census, you've got a lot of workers. I guess it goes back to the idea of a third-position with those who are ideologically rigid. As they see themselves neither as purveyors of capitalism, nor champions of socialism. To many I know, the state, determining that nationalist protections are more important than the profit of the megacorporations, would punish those who attempt to outsource, or bring in outsiders.

When the basis of your ideals is the protection and perpetuation of your nation itself, disloyal capitalists, and anti-nationalist forces like those of internationalist socialist movements, are quickly placed into the same category. Traitors.

You're kinda proving his point by having to play such extreme mind games to make your own argument work.