Alright, but WHY? I don't mind remakes as much, if they're taken care of with respect and dignity. We've only gotten TWO unique Mario & Luigi RPG games, and one of them was a forced paper Mario cash-in.
I'd be less aggravated if they used the older, superior artsyle with classic cel animation and ported it to the switch instead, but rather, we got yet another lazy, shallow, sedated "remake" with the shitty clay styled dream team engine.
Is Nintendo purposely dumbing down its playerbase so they can reap the max profits after there is nothing more in their consumer base than numales, manchildren and actual children? Are standards and quality control absolutely, without a shadow of a fucking doubt, dead? Nintendo didn't even fulfill the full potential after the 90's, it wasn't supposed to go downhill so soon. Is it just Nintendo, or do they reflect of off what society gives them?
That's fine and all, but I'm so damn curious on why backlash isn't as big as I thought, or existent even, I am thinking Nintendo did succeed at making their consumer base retarded and full of the goodest goyim. I am no longer the target audience, and I most likely haven't been so in almost 10 years.
Someone ought to re-animate your clip with Kimishima or one of the other Nintendo higher ups. Even waluigi would do nicely.
It's there because they pledged to continue support of the 3DS, and that's it. They're not putting a ton of work into it beyond smoothing over the little touches the original game had. I would even say that Alpha Dream is dog tired of the fucking mario and luigi games even given it's all they produce in years.
It's not that there's people excited over this, no. It's just that nobody cares about the 3ds at this stage, even on here i've seen more people bitch about the 3DS still getting games(especially with the luigi's mansion remake) instead of the switch more than anything.
Aaron Moore
Money, that's what you get for trusting soulless nips. Where's your superior Japanese games industry now?
Carson Smith
I don't mind the 3DS getting new games, but shit like this is just absolutely shameless. What support even is this if you can play a game a decade prior with extremely similar gameplay, content and even arguably, graphics. This isn't worth a 40$ pricetag, and they use the shitty little "post game" to justify it. I wouldn't be surprised if the shroobs were omitted completely.
It's gonna come back. Right? ;-;
Kevin Jackson
Aside from ability to make more money on the same ideas, I really don't get why lately there's been a trend to remake games that still handle just fine. Especially cases like this, Radiant Historia, and Strange Journey, where the original game isn't that old anyhow and is outright playable on the system the remakes are going to by way of backwards compatibility in the first place. Not exactly a case of the originals' visuals not holding up either (these aren't a case of, say, early 3D PS1 games using the PS2 for a facelift a few generations back).
Jace Morales
...
Austin Sanders
I'd argue Atlus is more worse when it comes to remakes. They have been adding day 1 dlc to every remake they touch.
