How well-read are you in (predominantly revolutionary or otherwise) left wing literature?

How well-read are you in (predominantly revolutionary or otherwise) left wing literature?

strawpoll.me/12372175

Other urls found in this thread:

plato.stanford.edu/entries/max-stirner/
marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1959/09/nationalism.htm.
google.com/search?q=neoreactionary card&client=firefox-b&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia4uGw5Z7SAhVEOSYKHeASBNwQ_AUICSgC&biw=1920&bih=971#tbm=isch&q=neoreactionary cards
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

wouldn't be wiser to just give the names of several authors and just let people check the ones they've read? some people might have not read the manifesto but the brumaire, or not have read kropotkin but have read proudhon and so on

I've only read parts of books, because I am lazy af

Started with Stirner and ended with Stirner.
Seriously ruined all taste I had for leftist thought.

i've read the manifesto and wtf is """""""""""""""""school of life"""""""""""""""""""?
more like the frankfurt school of life amirite

The point is not to uncover what one has or hasn't read, but whether one has read much at all, so I used incremental options.

This means that for a situation like
you can just check the "I've read the bigger works of their respective movements (State and Revolution and WLaC for Marxist communism, God and the State and Conquest of Bread for anarchism, etc.)" option, within which the options in the brackets are just general examples (i.e. it may also be 18th Brumaire for Marxcom and What is Property? for narcho).

good joke fam, still voted the sixth option

The first chapter of Capital vol. 1 is all you need, everything else can be easily deduced from it.

The first chapter of anything is all you need, really

the definition of communism is all you need, everything else can be easily deduced from it.

Basic principles of logic is all you need, everything else can be easily deduced from it.

What a suspiciously low amount of School of Life/Wikipedia votes…

The fuck is the School of Life? Aside from that, I've read Marx's simpler texts, but Capital is too daunting. I've also read the basic works of Kropotkin and Proudhon. Nothing else.

School of Life is an org best known for its Youtube channel, which features Alain de Botton narrating explanations of philosophy, but also socialist, anarchist and communist ideas and their respective thinkers. Babby's first revolutionary perspective, for most.

Seems like trash with virtually zero relevance.
Doesn't seem like it, considering no one is selecting the options. You should probably have been more vague and just said "youtube".

...

Yeah, I'd rather not be involved in google recaptcha tracking me around.
Can't you faggots understand poal.me is better by miles? And it has optionality for chat?

School of Life in particular is a reference to one of our resident trips/personalities "RebelAbsurdity" (simply referred to Rebel, usually) directly admitting their knowledge of philosophy and revolutionary theory comes from School of Life, and we managed to get screenshots of his saved playlists having almost only School of Life before he made them private.

I've read a fairly large amount of literature along the platformist tradition (originating in Bakunin), however I've been more into reading about Communalism and Bookchin lately.

...

Good observation, Holla Forums.

R8 my theories:

The Conquest of Bread
The Ego and Its Own
What is Property?
Manufacturing Consent
Studies in Mutualist Political Economy
Capital in the 21st Century
Understanding Power
Post-Scarcity Anarchism
The Ecology of Freedom
Chomsky On Anarchism

post 3x3s

we already knew

What did he mean by this??/?.

trash/10

hope this is a joke

Your self that only exist outside of the mirror stage and is given life by a mother's eyes, is my creative nothing, my nigger.

Does anyone take him seriously?

Stirner was a structuralist before structuralism senpai
?

...

...

Communist Manifesto…EN ESPERANTO.

Don't spread lies.
plato.stanford.edu/entries/max-stirner/
"More recently, Stirner has been
identified as a nascent poststructuralist (linked not least with Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995)), rejecting the idea of a universal human nature, employing a genealogical critique of humanist discourses of power and identity, and opposing various forms of state-centric thought. It would be a mistake to deny that these parallels can be plausible and interesting. However, they might well seem to reflect changing historical enthusiasms as much as they accurately capture aspects of Stirner's philosophical and political thought."

"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.

Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.

In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty."

(Joseph Stalin)

In other words, gualg yourself retard

nah

there's too many nepotistic and defensive happy merchants on the left. they (mostly) only care about their ethnoreligious interests.

stalin was well aware of the threat they posed, hence why he had them deported and purged

there are some good ones, but I don't trust most of them

...

it's all around confusion, but what do you expect from an anarkid?

Idiot: marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1959/09/nationalism.htm.


Not more than lifestyle guides to a revolutionary programme not made or influenced by them at all, but eh.

these people do google.com/search?q=neoreactionary card&client=firefox-b&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwia4uGw5Z7SAhVEOSYKHeASBNwQ_AUICSgC&biw=1920&bih=971#tbm=isch&q=neoreactionary cards

"TFW too intelligent for theory" (warning: while this is the option with the most comedic value, it is also an instant admition of not even watching School of Life videos)
op wasn't a faggot today

these answers to the poll are great op. Many keks were had

Low discipline, comrades. Undialectical; sad!

denk you very much

...