Did anyone else here go through a right wing libertarian phase?

I went through a (Italian) fascist phase until I realized such a movement would inevitably work to the advantage of the capitalist elite against the people. I'll admit I'm still extremely susceptible to Romantic ideals and care little for the plight of oppressed foreigners. I just think capitalism will kill us all.

The cancer is spreading. A Libertarian party is participating in the Dutch general elections now. They won't get any seats, but it's still a disturbing trend.

wow that's embarrass

Going primmie afterwards isn't much of an improvement either.

I'm a Greene.

I have no excuses.

No but i have friends that are still in it

Yeah still there

...

lol no. This society/civilization is completely dead even commies admit to that

Not so much that, more that my political knowledge went like
I was politically apathetic until I found leftism and realized that I wasn't the first person to see liberalism as unstable and unsustainable. It was like being able to breathe for the first time. Similar to a lot of stories of people leaving a religion. I said I was a libertarian or whatever ideology seemed like it was least harmful when people pressed me for political affiliation, though, because I'd catch a lot of shit if I said the whole system looks fucked.

I briefly flirted with RA Wilson-style libertarianism in my late teens. I don't think he really counts as rightwing tho.

I went through a European equivalent similar to classical liberalism called ordoliberalism here. It's a conservative take on liberal democracy and capitalism; about mostly supporting laissez-faire, but it doesn't follow the specific line of small/no government intervention; in fact precisely the opposite in that ordoliberal praxis involves constantly intervening to make sure the market is entirely left to its own devises as much as possible, but also involving the welfare state to make sure labor is properly provided to serve the interests of the free market. I guess libertarianism never really took off here, outside of course the original anarchistic libertarians of the 19th century.

...

When I was in elementary school I found the basic ideas of libertarianism really attractive. I lived in a libshit city so the dude weed appeal was definitely there. But since my city had an open busing policy for school I got to see what diversity really was in middle school. I stopped caring about politics around then and just went to parties and drugs and all that. Learned about 4chan in 05 in my first year of high school and then I rode the gradual road from ironic racism to capitalism is incredibly flawed to liberal ideology is shit and idpol is fucking annoying to uncle adolf.

I studied anthropology in university so I got hit with the REAL hard dose of social justice and all of that. I remember a lecture where I felt just so incredibly disgusted made by a woman who interjected her political beliefs onto the cultural values of some afican tribe. Then I found out that was the field of anthropology pretty much now.

Monarchism is the only system that will last all other systems will fail

...

You are a retard, pic related

Doesn't really change the fact that only the superior systems survive. If you want to have a stable civilization you implement monarchy. Marx's theories was wrong, he had no data to back up his theory and it is basically secular Calvinism. There is no new man, all other attempts to move away from monarchism will eventually fail and monarchism will return. Slavery will also be reintroduced given time.

Did you just step out of a time machine dude? Monarchism already failed.

I have one and only one thing to say to that.
Wew lad

Whatever definition you think you have of Darwinism it's wrong and has nothing to do with Darwin

Monarchy has already failed and, as such, was never fit enough to last

While we are at it, Monarchy is not a complete system. Monarchs just inherit wealth and power, you might as well consider modern america an aristocracy under that approach. The system that had Monarchy as a part of it was Feudalism, which has been thoroughly beaten by capitalism.

I believe my libertarianism was fundamental to my actual Marxist beliefs. Marxism is just the logical conclusion of the libertarian's fight for freedom.

Every civilization with some exceptions for the last 6000 years have had monarchism. The reason they had monarchism was because that was the superior system and everything else failed.
Democracies and republics will either create a rotting system that eventually is replaced by monarchism, just look at today's society
Not-Real-communism gives you monarchism after three generations(North Korea) or it collapses because the system is so shitty replacing it with a democracy
Empires always collapse making way to new monarchies
Everything but Monarchy is LARPing

You can have monarchism with slavery(every civ before the fall of Rome), monarchism with feudal system(mostly monotheistic societies) or monarchism with capitalism(kaiser Wilhelm/napoleon style). When I talk about monarchism I talk about monarchism in the sense of direct power is being inherited from generation to generation(so not your idea of american monarchism). North-Korea is by my definition, now a monarchy.

I been interedted in talking with a monarchist because Schopenhauer made the only good defense of monarchism.
I am unsure but I feel other monarchists and traditionalist will agree that the point of monarchy is not inherency but allowing an individual that stands up from the rest to lead. For Evola that was god's chosen, for Schopenhaur that was a lion among rats dunno about other rightist thinkers.
The issue is how can this vision be reconciliated with socialism?

Monarchy is dead, just like Darwinism says it would.

It is not superior for that very reason.

that kind of does still apply to the US though