Capitalism 1, Capitalism 2 and Capitalism Lab

I remember Capitalism 2 from way back when on some shitty thing I had on my computer called "Big Fish Games" or whatever, and I only played it for two hours or so but what I played, I enjoyed immensely. Recently I rediscovered the game and the sequel of sorts that is Capitalism Lab. It's been 10 years or something like that since I last played these games; should I give them a shot? Does it reflect economics properly?

Well, first you read this handy guide on how to defeat main boss of the game…

I should have expected this when I posted a game entitled "Capitalism"

Then you fight the ultra optional boss, Starvation.

Easy introduce welfare and watch these lazy marxists die off

You mean how to destroy your own country for the jew?

And the thread is destroyed because someone made a joke.

Karl Marx is indeed a joke.

It's fine though. More bumps the better. They seem like fairly niche games anyways, so I doubt nu/v/ would be familiar with them.

>His (((philosophies))) ended up killing more people then any religion
Has there ever been a more successful failure

Yeah, communism and the fools that believe in it.

I still can't believe that a bad guy would just sell his plans like this. I can understand a greedy bad guy, but a greedy bad guy who sells his game plan?
Sage because I feel sorry for OP.

If you read the 2nd image like a comic, it kind looks like the exit guy is running away from 9/11.

Kikes be kikes user.

user, I…

It's alright buddy. Holla Forums will be better soon… the two year long summer may soon end and we could return back to the comfy 2014-2015 Holla Forums. I'm noticing a coincidence in the rise of Holla Forums and the destruction of quality on this website.

That's not Robert E. Howard.

I remember going to that board just to see how quick I can get banned, and one of the responses was literally some pseudo intellectual using pseudo intellectual jargon to basically just say stop making fun of us.

Close enough (and frankly, in my opinion, could have been a better author if he had any confidence in his works).

I made the mistake of trying to argue with them a while back. Also, just report the fucking thread. It's dead to me.

I played capitalism 2 a lot and loved it in my teenager years, I though being able to make super power company in game would give a hefty advantage over capitalist life
now I'm unemployed fucking weeb in his 30s still living with his parents

yeah because they're totally irrelevant even in today is world…. and totally not the only mega power capable of opposing jew land US


I doubt it so, plus, what killed most people in russia was undoubtedly ww2

tell us how ChK was a lie again, user

You couldn't even have the decent to let it die.

I found this funny because starvation in the modern era has only ever reached measurable levels in places controlled by socialist regimes.

oy vey

You're not even one of those idiots that knows just enough to think they're an expert on a topic. Just full dummy.

...

Communism already killed more people in Russia then Hitler killed Jews, before ww2 even started.

>

Oh wow, it gets worse, too. Half of the countries listed as >27 are in the high 30s/40s, while the other half are right around 28. Biased map is biased as shit.

no you dumdum
what I meant is deaths from the war directly, russia vs germany,
that front was basically the biggest bloodbath in history of war


okay, I'm gonna baiting shit now
but people need to learn to think for themselves, just because you learn communism was bad in school, it doesn't mean its true
1. there is a difference between government method and economical system
2. money, or fiat currency system is plain purely a human invention, it doesn't serve any purpose in nature
3. where facing the impending biggest financial crisis and consequential collapse of it

Reminds me of a study that claimed a ridiculous percentage of Americans lived in poverty. When you actually dig deeper and take a look at their methods though you see that they included people with air conditioning and video game consoles. Anyone can be in poverty if you stretch the definition hard enough. You can make a study say whatever you want as long as you omit enough info that contradicts the agenda you are trying to push.

...

literally every nigger today has access to technology, nigger be living in shit favela, with the risk of getting a missed bullet to the face,
still he wants to have a big screen tv and a console, so he can watch shit tv and play dumb games, and keep being poor
that is another question of the economical crisis, the reversal of values,
the idea is that having something is better than being something (heavily influenced by marketing, and therefor capitalism)

I thought capitalism 2 was interesting but it's trying a little too hard to seem 'realistic'


What?
Even if it were not clear that central planning and communism were inextricably linked, any capitalism proponent could use the same 'argument'.
Fiat is not the same as 'money'. I'll give you a hint, it's a Latin word meaning the government is a parasite by arbitrary order. Furthermore, mathematics, abstract objects, and economics as a whole are plausibly human inventions so its unclear what point you're trying to make. However since all value is always entirely subjective it doesn't really matter whether or not any given person sees a purpose to something or not.
This is speculation except when applied to communism