Why AltRighters keep getting caught with the very degenerate fetish porn they accuse others of

TRIGGERED

FIRST OFF, I'M NOT WASTING MY TIME READING ALL THAT, PIC RELATED. LACANIANS AND THEIR ILK CAN'T SAY ANYTHING IN LESS THEN 10,000 WORDS. THIS IS EXACTLY HOW THEY KEEP GETTING IMPORTANCE IN LEFTIST CIRCLES, THEY CAN'T SHUT THE FUCK UP.

SECONDLY, I CAN'T EVER FIND A THING THEY DREAM UP IN THEIR DIATRIBES THAT'S BASED ON ANY REALITY. IT'S ALL SHIT THAT'S TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN.

THE LEFT NEEDS TO CUT THESE LACANIAN FUCKERS OUT OF THEIR CIRCLES UNTIL THEY GET BACK TO TERMS WITH REALITY, YOU KNOW THAT THING MARX LOVED SO MUCH, MATERIALISM.

I am not reading all that shit, does not even look like a real study

it's called summarize it or we're not reading your trash

Reading is for faggots!

t. Holla Forums

...

This is unreadable.

this is bait, let's take a snippet of the article…

From the text:
Glomming onto Sartre in the whole article, but especially here is garbage. "It's a possibility if you look at Sartre in a certain light that Lacan said it first and this is Sartre's version". Go fuck yourself author.

As a sadist in an active BDSM relationship none of this is right. I get TONS of pleasure out of inflicting pain, and the other is there to give me pleasure. Then there;s the issue of control here. The Top/Dom //does not and never has// control, the bottom/sub does. If not then it isn't BDSM, it's just abuse.

I don't see it at all with spite, I see it as a gift my wife gives to me. She sees my preparing for, thoughtful execution, and making sure she's safe during a scene to be my gift to her.

NOPE FUCKING WRONG AGAIN. It's like they haven't even talked to people who do the things they talk about. It's all I can do to stop myself from letting her cum, or just stopping the scene and fucking her right there.

inb4youaren'tarealsadist

I love watching the squriming of a girl while she's being whipped, it's even better if I'm the one holding the whip. If that's not the textbook definition of a sadist, then the globalist reptilians have won.

LET THIS BE A WARNING TO LEFTISTS FREUD AND LACAN ARE FUCKING FRAUDS AND SHOULD NOT BE EVEN CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, SEND THEM TO GULAG

i get caught on purpose, its to ease tensions when everything is on fire

ITT: people frantically deleting their Nazi Cosplay fetish folders

your flaw is that you're viewing your pleasure 'as such,' i.e. as something that is purely a result of the sexual activity, and not out of the much more fundamental psychological desire the sexual act is fulfilling.

i don't doubt that you're deriving real pleasure from sadism, however i'd wager it's not just the sadistic sex that is engaging with your desire.

So? If whatever the other desire is, assuming it exists for argument, is being fullfilled , I'm getting pleasure out of it why does it matter, especially if the other person is willing?

Also you skip over the article saying I don't get pleasure out of it…
But I do and you conceded

Then you also gloss over this bit…
But I don't and you concede that point as well…

The glossing over continues…
But I don't, I see it as literally the opposite way.

Needed to fix this..

Also you skip over the article saying I get pleasure out of denying myself, when I don't, I deny myself because if I don't it makes for a shitty session

wtf, why does Zizek like this nonsense? Lacan is dumb.

So you're one of those people that get triggered when a word with which they identify is used differently in a different context. What you call "sadism" in the context of "BSDM" is something completely different than what sadism means outside of your snowflake club. I wouldn't trust your interpretation of anything. You're probably an American, or spend too much time on reddit.
OP's essay is still shit though.

Nah.

No I'm triggered at Lacan and his ideas in general, especially when they are pushed in leftist circles. Also the other user I was talking to seemed to be a Lacanian and didn't have a problem with the way I used the definition.

It's the dictionary definition.

- Oxford Dict

I also fit the DSM definition (when it was in there):
psychnet-uk.com/x_new_site/personality_psychology/a_diagnostic_criteria/criteria_personality_sadistic.html

But I know how much Lacanians dislike that book. So what fucking definition are you talking about then?

And who the fuck are you?

Agreed

Within the context of BDSM sadism is just one sexual fetish among others, being limited to "sexy-time". Outside of BDSM sadism isn't a situational and sexual fetish, "your thing", it's instead a general tendency that shows up in everywhere, like kids having a constant drive to torture animals or their siblings.
Why do you assume I have to be somebody to tell you that you're a retard? Do you want me to confess you my snowflake fetishes too?

Fuck no. You're the one trying to tell us something; I don't care if your message ends up getting across or not.

And you don't consider it likely that will get you thrown into a camp once your Not Socialist regime comes into power?

who would've thought some fucking continental hacks who made shit up were wrong!

It probably won't tbh from what I've read there were practicing pedophiles in the Nazi hierarchy.

Chomsky pls go (i.e. die)

Can someone summarize this thread for me?

The Alt-Right is in fact composed of actual, complete and utter faggots. You can just look on one of the other faggot boards to realize this. So many of these fags want to be "traditional housewives" to Holla Forumsacks.

It's amazing.

You aren't.

So what?

Huh, also seems to summarize the last few years.

Nah bro anyone that tells you Nazi's didn't have dope fashion sense is a liar. Its the reason they're always in movies

Too bad a housewife that cant have kids is literally a parasite, the thing Holla Forums claims to hate most

...

Why am I not surprised