The proletariat is not a revolutionary class. Marx was wrong in asserting that the workers would be the flame of revolution simply because it's from their labor that any society exists (yeah I know Daddy Marx is never wrong about anything a bloo bloo).
The revolutionary class must be the young petty-bourgeoise who have to live in late-capitalism. Don't get me wrong a lot of the IdPol stuff is stupid but that's not the point. My point is that these College Liberals are the class which, when radicalized by events such as Trump or Brexit, have the actual time, money, and energy to competently change society in a practical way.
This of course doesn't mean the proletariat aren't who should be fought FOR and aren't, in time, the class which will continue the Revolution. It just means that the seat of revolt lays with those who can't be easily manipulated by Fascist propaganda, which is made specifically to appeal to the proletariat who are, through no fault of their own of course, just as simple minded and more interested in emotion rather than thought as Fascism itself.
Basically my point is that in Marx's time (and perhaps even in Lenin's or Luxemburg's) it was possible for the proletariat to be revolutionary because the power of Capitalist media hadn't become so consolidated in the hands of the Right and the Right didn't have the Fascist rhetoric they do now. So basically, if we are to believe in historical materialism, it is simply correct that the petty-bourg youth establishing a militantly social democratic society is the only way to go if you want to not LARP and actually get something accomplished (AKA what 90 percent of you don't want to do)
Show me any proletarian-led revolution that has changed the world for the better. Show me any revolution led by petty-bourg that didn't have a lasting positive impact that inched liberal democracy closer to a truly socialist society
The third world's existence is the fault of capitalism and porky, not Sweden
The brilliant marxist revolutionaries ladies and gentlemen
Thomas Cox
LELLLLL
Xavier Reyes
t. liberal
Lincoln Rodriguez
People are just tired of dealing with it
Landon Morales
You're like the guy who pretends climate change is a chinese hoax because it makes you feel bad. It's okay, smart people will save the day soon enough.
Robert Sullivan
But there were societies before workers
Colton Diaz
Workers=/=Laborers read marx and adam smith
William Ortiz
That's the point you retard. None of what you said merits any response. Like the tripfriend said, you've been spouting the same liberal memes and ideology since you got here. Why give you any effort at all?
Wyatt Adams
And you call yourself a Marxist
Dominic Kelly
It's not my judgment. All you did was just strawman Marx. You don't know what is meant by 'revolutionary class.' And that much is obvious.
John Long
kek
Aiden Gomez
Tbh while the petit bourg do end up being exploiters and having employees, it's often a desire to be paid for what you consider your own full worth that makes you take that path. They just dont know anything about politics beyond the mainstream.
The petit-bourg are still closer to the proletariat
Easton Lewis
Okay.
Jace Rogers
1. Most college liberals are not petite bourgeois and will grow up to be wage slaves. 2. The petite bourgeoisie is too small and weak to be a revolutionary class. It does not encompass a large enough section of society to stand up to the real bourgeoisie. Its only potential is in mobilizing the proletariat. 3. Most Liberals aren't becoming radicalized, or radicalizing in the wrong direction. The populist right and ultra smug liberals who blame the people for being too stupid to vote for their awesome candidates are both far more influential than the left.
