Communal child raising

Nothing more than people being able to bring a life into the world and exert control over it with near impunity.

It's not like we'd be hurting for labor in this hypothetical society. If a little kid can work, wants to work, and the work doesn't cause health problems I don't care if they work.

It's extra fun when they're probably literally autistic and obviously repressed gay.

There's a reason why "ragtag band of heroes" is such a popular story element. One thing that makes humans stand out from other species is our ability to cooperate with people we're not related to.

i'm_a_centrist.png

(OP)
It's the only way to guarantee individual freedom.

The best way to teach children social/moral values is through social role models not by imposing it on them, unless you want a fake mindless drone and not a free and honest individual. As for formal education of children, it should first focus on practical skills, so they can work as soon as possible and academic knowledge later if they want to.


All of this.


Which is more of a reason to go against it. Nature sucks, if we want to create a better society we have to surpass nature.


Nope, I am statist as fuck because I know that only a powerful State can protect children from their parents. Also the fact that it's a pre-capitalist institution only makes it an even more traditional oppressive institution.

You wouldn't continue to live with someone that you didn't get along with and/or disliked. Then why the double-standard towards blood-related people? People should be free to associate with whomever they want regardless of their age.


t. slave that forgot how it felt like to be a child constantly submitted to adults.

I completely agree, but you can't get everyone to follow rolemodels if the only rolemodels you pick are complete normalfags. When people realize they are fundamentally different from their friends, they look for rolemodels like themselves. If there aren't any, it doesn't work.

its cool if everyone is friends and knows each other well, not cool at all if its done in a statist commie society with pedos and creepy misanthropes handling children through bureacracies. also children should still live with parents, but spend a lot of time with the community. taking them away at birth is evil and anti-human

Oh so this is the daily stealth pedo thread then. Carry on.

Not really sure what you mean by "normalfags". Also rolemodels don't need to be real, they can be fictional characters.


The only thing the State would do is ensure children do whatever they want and protect them from people who want to violate their freedom. As for sexual harassment and rape of children: the reason why this exists is because children are conditioned to view adults as superior to them so they find it difficult to refuse unwanted sexual advances. By treating them like adults, letting them do what they want to do and not submit to adults and letting them carry firearms to defend themselves, this would stop being an issue.

If they want to.


Read above.

Holla Forums's desire to dismantle the family unit is one of the biggest reasons you'll never go beyond a tiny fringe movement.

It is common for the same people who talk about providing good rolemodels to want to have only the blandest and most stereotypically normal role models. Anyone different ends up getting banned because of a mistaken belief that they will "spread fun".


No, it's another "anfem barges in and says something stupid" thread.

What ages are you talking about here?
Unless it's late teens you're basically proposing a eugenics program which selects for the least playful children.