Arguing with a buddy of mine about race

I don't know bro.

Maybe ask him if he has any proof for race.

From what I've seen though, most of the Holla Forums types have actually done a lot of research. They might end up looking at biased sources and reaching questionable conclusions, but they aren't just throwing out wild accusations. Well, the holocaust deniers are, but most of their arguments aren't that bad.

So they were right about everything except da jooz?

They're not completely right about anything and they've missed the mark on most things, but their conclusions are evidence based. They've done more than the average liberal does to verify their beliefs.

Unfortunately just because you find some evidence which points to something doesn't mean it's actually true, especially when you get away from the hard sciences. There's an equal abundance of evidence against them which a different person could use to reach the opposite conclusion. To know for sure you'd have to do a fuck of a lot of very rigorous research, since you can't really trust any sources to be unbiased on the topic.

Again, you're missing the point. It's not about if they're right or not. It's about why they need to be right in the first place. The problem I have with Nazis on this particular issue is that they basically copy the SJW argument of "overrepresentation." Instead of "white people" and "normative behaviors" the Nazis replace it with "Jews, non-whites" and "degen­eracy."

Yes, they borrow a lot of arguments from the feminist play-book. No arguments there.

Unfortunately this is true. Feminists are generally bad at making criticism.

Or taking, for that matter.

Do you think these things are untrue?

Come on, Holla Forums, you don't seriously wanna hurt these children do you?