does the fact that "primitive communism" never existed have any bearing on Marxist ideology? we have evidence of private property ownership dating back 20,000+ thousand years. Recent history (last couple thousand years, definitely attests to this as well).
Seems people are wired to appreciate and be motivated by private property, private family building, private ownership of the means of production, private land ownership, etc.. And even engaging willingly in selling their labor at a fair price.
Also the idea of an organized group having no hierarchy and power-differences seems absurd, considering people have different skills, intelligence levels and motivations in life. Some actually enjoy being followers and not worrying about maintaining land or businesses, while others like being leaders, owning land and toiling constantly.
This entire ideology is based on Hegel, Christian idealism, and blank slateism. 19th century bullshit removed from actual facts.
It's an dumb meme. Embrace ethno fascism brother.
Oliver Brooks
Please don't.
Carson Sullivan
its not /fa/ enough
Jordan Gonzalez
[CITATION NEEDED]
Even early republican Rome had communal adminstration of property, and hunter-gatherer societies and neolithic societies that exist today don't have private property.
Primitive communism exists today
Lucas Clark
...
Joseph Watson
Fascists literally ruin everything.
Dominic Hernandez
20,000+ years is when Marx speaks of slave societies. Did you even bother to read Marx on this matter?
Lincoln Wilson
wait I'm not sure what you mean. In primitive societies people owned MoP? Also Are you new here?
kek
Daniel Scott
Marxist dialectic was never founded on historical data or evidence, thus the whole concept falls apart with even the briefest examination of facts.
You are living a deluded dream of a 19th century Jewish NEET who lived off his rich industrialist friend.
