Decentralized Planned Economy

Can someone explain a decentralized planned economy? Right now I'm for centralized but decentralized sounds pretty cool to.

Other urls found in this thread:

jacobinmag.com/2015/04/allende-chile-beer-medina-cybersyn/
marxists.org/subject/economy/authors/pe/
gowans.wordpress.com/2012/12/21/do-publicly-owned-planned-economies-work/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Here's an interesting example:

jacobinmag.com/2015/04/allende-chile-beer-medina-cybersyn/

Are you an intern or something? I've seen you post at least 3 jacobin articles in the last hour alone.

No, I just like the magazine.

Basically people send there demands through computers and the state run enterprise does it?

Somewhat. It was highly decentralized and had built-in features to prevent Orwellian or Stalinist abuse. At least according to what I've read, I'm not an expert admittedly. It's a largely forgotten piece of history and economics.

Cool would there still be money or would everyone get free shit lmoa

That's kind of an idiotic question.

I was talking to ancoms and they were talking about a money less decentralized planned economy.

Which sounds idiotic.

I don't get it either.

In any case, Cybersyn wasn't an attempt at "anarchy". AFAIK it's the only decentralized planned attempt, but I'm sure there are others.

This is becoming a meme, isn't it? I have seen several threads about this these past couple of weeks.

Anyway, the earliest ideas about what we're calling "decentralized planning" were with the early cyberneticians. They had an inkling of government support during the Thaw, but lost it even before Krushchev was out. I have the romantic notion that "decentralized planning" would have led to the much dreamed-of socialism with a human face, but we will never know.

I have several books primed to read about it, but I never get started because I'm a master at procrastination. If you want to get a head start on me: From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: A History of Soviet Cybernetics, "The Cybernetics Scare and the Origins of the Internet", "InterNyet: why the Soviet Union did not build a nationwide computer network", "From Cybernetics to Cyber Networks", maybe a couple more that I'm missing now. There's also Red Plenty in fiction, it's full of that sanctimonious bullshit about how Bolsheviks were amoral intellectuals and apostles of violence and all that crap, but it's a great read.

Related to it, Soviets also built the only electronic ternary computers. The factory assigned to build them hated them because they were too cost-efficient and cheap. Apparently ternary computers have significant advantages, but I can't tell which they are because material about the topic in English is close to zero.

Computers are goddamn scabs

You can have decentralized planning but centrally coordinated production.

Ludd tried to warn us, but no one listened.

Unless you are Hoxa fearing some electromagnetic bombs this step seems like unnecessary bureaucracy. Just replace them with a server which will accept the orders directly from people.

Computers can malfunction.

not if you decentralize the network correctly.
Sure, if there would be one, gigantic state-owned central server which would process every single thing, there would be high chance of malfunction.
But if you decentralize it bitcoin-style, there would be no problem if a few computers malfunction, the rest will continue as if nothing happened. This would mean, in oversimplified form, that every person have at home a little bit of government - computer(s) which would hold information about production and needs, maybe more, based on decisions of central state committee.

No ancom talks about money in an anarchist society. Collectivists and syndicalists to an extent either directly (for some of the former ) or indirectly through labor vouchers (for either case, usually as a temporary measure for syndicalists), but not straight ancoms. Read a fucking book.


It's more that it prevented cities from starving and essential production from halting while the strike is underway. That's a fairly equitable way to permit the workers to strike while not endangering the health and livelihood of large swaths of uninvolved people.


Still less so than human operators, and as put it, that problem diminishes on the larger economic scale if the network in question is decentralized.

decentralized planning is undemocratic and leads to anarchy of production, what you need is a plan by society as a whole and decentralized execution of the plan

marxists.org/subject/economy/authors/pe/

decentralized>>>centralized

Centralized systems are inevitably run for the benefit of the center, not the people.

It was a strike by business owners, not workers, and they received $2m in CIA money for the muh privilege

The abolition of rational economy. Do you really think economic agent #33,863 can actually gather information on all the tens of thousands of other plans and direct their own activity accordingly without a price mechanism to coordinate them? Give me a fucking break people. The centralized plan is communism, it is the only means available to break free from the dictatorship of capital over our lives.

gowans.wordpress.com/2012/12/21/do-publicly-owned-planned-economies-work/

Funny you should mention that, because when the Soviet cyberneticians proposed using iterative methods and networks to calculate optimum production, party busybodies accused them of bringing back capitalist price-setting.