Why do charities and NGO's help the poor but never the middle class?
so once the poor reach midde class they stop being relevant?
Why do they help drug addicts instead of helping healthy male boys reach higher places?
that slave mentality,the worship of crippling weakness..makes me totally sick.
i ACCEPT I need help, it's not my fault my ancestors didn't provide for my wealth. Why am I not helped?
what did I do wrong to deserved being trapped where I was born a la feudalism?
Because they don't help the poor to begin with, charities are mostly de facto for-profit organizations that sell guilt relief (the rest being religious) and NGOs are a thinly veiled and generally useless excuse for Western capitalists to operate in the third world with impunity.
Because resources are limited and help must be given to those who need it most you retard.
The middle class is middle class. It doesn't need help.
Cause drug addicts need to become healthy.
You were born in late capitalism. Start accepting the problem is inherit in the system. Stop thinking you "deserve" better. You are just another faggot like the rest of us.
Support socialism and we'll even get you a good therapist for your narcissistic personality disorder.
PS. NGOs are the neoliberal way to do charity and keep the plebs from rioting.
Have you ever heard of scholarships?
Or maybe considered that there are loads of easy to attain help for people with a bit of money?
this
:') boo woo!
So they are, INDEED helping the worst of the bad?
i does need help.
i DO DESERVE better.
i do not masturbate and you do.
Maybe you should start. It's healthy. Lowers the chances for prostate cancer.
Yes. With grammar.
Again, your problem is Capitalism.
However, sorry, you'll not get your "betterment" in socialism. you'll just have all the time you need to make yourself better. But not "socially higher".
if your so healthy why do you need the help a drug addict needs
Id rather have cancer(which I wont get) that indulge in such a filthy activity!
anyways it is a MYTH that is is healthy.
Why not socially higher?
we all know social layers exists so the wealthier men can get the brattiest blonde girls, the spoiled ones who are vapid. I don't approve of such desires. but it's biology, you know.
Darwin's theory.
no social layers no more? sexual anarchy, Eugenics go down the rain, deformed populations will appear.
You must be 18 and older to post here
...
How do you know?
I don't want you to have, but how are you sure?
No wealthier men, not problem.
If you CAN be more "popular" or whatever, you'll have to do it on your own merrit.
Darwin never said "you have a porsche, you get to spread your genes"!
And Eugenics IS a myth.
Wait, this might be to more advantage!
so, in zoocialist society, ONLY your merit matters when mating?
it seems,,,truly eugenic!
Why are you typing like a retard
Because I hardly speack English, but, given the expected anti-racist leanings of this board i vehemently expect that to be not a motive for me being barred.
Alright. I thought you were 12. I don't understand the point you're trying to make. That life ain't fair?
My point if the thread (the clear poverty-loving miserabilist hippies of NGOs) was replaced by another point;
in a commie society,the only factor for mating would be "self", each male for himself, not his private property, which, notwhistanding certain relationship with the high Autism Level needed to acquire it, doesn't really influence genes.
So, even if superior genes should create superior property(houses, cars), the society would evolve under the new set of rules.
Imagine a world..
Where you only have to work so many hours as needed to have everyones basic needs covered. And since everyone else does as well… 6 hours per week.
And then you have all the time in the world, to create yourself as you wish. Meet whover you wish. Express yourself as you wish. Have sex with whoever you wish (as long as they wish to, as well).
This is socialism.
Now, go read Zizek or something.
Y…You do that! Whatever works!
or what? :')
Would I be given medical attention for my "mental trauma" that led me to "rape"?
or executed on the public square?
...
what¿
That's not a bad idea.
But more likely, prison and more psychoanalises or something.
Sorry. No rape in socialism!
Yes?
What about men with ugly faces?
do you give them money for paid whores?
Or wait until they out-breed themselves OH WAIT. That would be Eugenics!! the less fit not leaving offspring,right?
I have a ugly face and I've got a gf
What if you want a certain girl but she doesn't want you?
what would to resort to ,then?
Have you seen Zizek's wife?
Anyway, you are the one we says is "better". Why do you care about "ugly faces"?
Finding another girl to want.
Then you don't get her, dumbshit
OR!!!
WAIT FOR IT!!!
Getting a sex droid, because it's socialism and technology isn't being held back by capitalism.
why SHOULD a man accept that??
Ok.
Lets say, I am gay, and I want to have sex with you.
You don't.
Why should a man accept that?
You do to others are you'd like to be done to you.
Would you reject a 300kg girl that wants to date you?
Why am I even responding to someone this stupid?
That's not the same for a lot of reasons.
No, it's exactly the same.
You wann fuck a woman. I wanna fuck you. No difference there.
I don't wanna fuck you, it's hypothetical