This board is reactionary because it doesn't prioritize the most oppressed under capitalism by rejecting intersectionality.
Reddit style thread: Change My View
Brayden Jones
Ayden Jones
Being a socdem should be a bannable offense
Lucas Foster
That's no way to talk to your comrade.
Benjamin Foster
Your approach is liberalism because it proposes reforming capitalism and focusing on single issues instead of destroying the system as a whole.
Grayson Johnson
What if I told you… Your perception of who is most oppressed doesn't matter because some asshole with money could always inject cash to create more wedge issues between yourself and what they want the longer you ignore class warfare in favor of identity issues that will most likely sort themselves out anyway? The less we argue over vague identities conceptually and the more we attack class problems that coincide with identity issues like private prisons the easier these things will be in the long run. Stop fidgeting with pronouns and start agitating against moneyed interest.
Ryan Jones
Socialism can be legislated into existence.
Ex-Soviet countries are hell holes. China is a hypercapitalist polluted wasteland.
SocDem countries of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark are practical worker's paradises, and get closer to communism each year.
Cameron Torres
Intersectionality rejects any kind of "most oppressed" narrative because it would exclude people of a different class. As soon as one identifies the mechanism of oppression (ie class) all other concerns become epiphemomenal.
Kevin Miller
The oppression of women, POC, and LGBTQ people is more real than any of the class oppression you have experienced as a white male in a mixed market economy.
Bullshit. It's an objective fact that POC women are more oppressed than white men.
Lucas Lewis
Nobody here is your comrade, liberal.
Don't you have some workers to be selling out anyway?
Jose Flores
No it can't. You don't abolish capital without revolutionary violence.
Where's the argument?
Not even sure where to start tbh.