Tito

Why was he so based Holla Forums?
Is market socialism best socialism?

Other urls found in this thread:

gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=82F262A8F37A6909DFBE37FA7039A64E
youtube.com/watch?v=-4fufDMHwcs
twitter.com/AnonBabble

You forgot

Might as well drop that nazbol flag

He also refused to bend to Stalin's will and give up his nations sovereignty to simply be another satellite state of the Soviet Union, so one might consider him a civic nationalist in that sense. With that said, I'm not exactly a Titoist but I can respect other ideologies even if I don't agree with everything they stand for.

fuck off
gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=82F262A8F37A6909DFBE37FA7039A64E

Unlike Stalin, HE RAISED PHIL AND LOVES THE LADIES

Nazbols arent racialists, mostly.

Stop trying to make this meme happen, its not going to happen.

He's no Hoxha

Did he legit give the means of production to the workers?

So what? The Soviet Union had full employment but the quality of life was still shit. You might get some unemployment in a market setting, socialist or not. The trick is to regulate cooperatives in a way to increase employment. Yugoslavia wasn't perfect but it was still pretty good.

I am to an extent but not to Holla Forums levels. Exterminating entire races doesn't seem feasible, although I recognize that homogeneity generally increases solidarity across the board.

Through cooperatives, yeah.

race is a spook
communism means equal power for everyone, including niggers you idpol-loving nazi

So lets blanda ap shall we?

...

So, can someone actually explain the difference between a "National Bolshevik" and the left/Strasser wing of the Nazis?

Because they seem virtually indistinguishable.

National Bolshevik's are diverse but commonly they are closer to M-Ls while Asserites are more syndicalist/guild socialist.

Not really, the dictatorial nature of the state made their "control" a sham.

RIP in F sweet prince, you were too good for this gay Earth.


Still was the closest a commie country got to it.

I believe Tito realized stalin's brand of "socialism" wouldn't last and wanted to present yugoslavia as a "middle-ground" to the outside world in hopes that socialism in her might be preserved after the inevitable collapse of the eastern bloc.

He truly was up there with lenin when it comes to leaders in the 20th century. He might have not contributed to theory, but he did a lot for yugoslavia and most existing infrastructure wouldn't be there today if not for the SKJ. My family lives in belgrade, our house was given to my grandmother by the party and the beautiful area around it was built by the party. I'll forever be grateful.

sf/sn

youtube.com/watch?v=-4fufDMHwcs

...

...

This Tito meme is getting out of fucking control. It is absolute painful to witness these capital-socialist weenies try to fit in with the anti-tankie cult by virtue of the fact that their pet regime didn't have a socialized economy.

Yugoslavia demonstrated all the same problems of inequality, stagnation, aristocratic government, and state repression that were so prominent in all 20th century socialist societies. Trying to portray it as some perfectly-realized democracy solely because of some modest electoral freedoms at minor levels (which all Stalinist states had) is near-laughable wishful thinking and nothing more. The next revolution will fail to be a truly emancipatory if Titoist filth and all like them are not swiftly repressed.

...

this
fuck tito, hoxha gang for life