Is cultural marxism real or is it just another fascist spook?

What's even weirder is how the same mysticism he was drawing from in his Thesis on the Philosophy of History is the same mystical tradition Hasidics follow, I'm not kidding.

Here famlam watch this
This is cultural marxism:-
youtube.com/watch?v=S9AbuFhT0W4

And pics is what Cultural marxism trying to save us from.

That is the worst caricature of Adorno I've ever seen.

...

Its basically the same sort of shit as flat earth theory or Ickeism.
It has no basis in reality, nothing you can actually use as proof of its existence and anything that people claim that it causes can actually be proven to be caused by other things (i.e capitalism)
It only annoys us because it has the word marxism in it - i.e anything "left" is some marxist conspiracy to destroy the west. Pointing to liberals and calling them marxists is like telling a legitimate neo-nazi that the Republican party is a perfect fit for their beliefs.

As soon as you know that a key part of the definition of both communism and socialism is workers seizing the means of production, you should know "cultural-Marxism" is bullshit, but some will try to say otherwise anyway.

This. The Franks were no fans of progress and critiqued the negative effects of capitalism and modernity on daily life.

This is not a grandma this is a little girl you filthy animal

who even made this chart lol

Holla Forumstards are unable to understand anything that isn't STEM so they need neat little images to comprehend things.

So you admit critical theory was about destroying the superstructure of capitalism? Essentially the ultra-liberalism of the West that used unequal relations between minorities etc to divide the proletariat against themselves?

Uhmmm. Why do you think the actual econ left is a total minority that can basically only post here, or on pol?

Critical Theory was never some grand plot by the Franks to uproot western civilization. See:

The Franks' critiques of western culture were rather conservative, nowhere close to all the postmodernist garbage which steams from the universities today.

exactly

Mao is suppose to come after Stalin

Fascists probably like Mao's reactionary cultural views.

Mao was quite the nationalist in his own right.

indeed
marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/red-book/ch18.htm

Doesn't accepting the concept of proletariat and all workers sharing the means of productions imply rejecting, muddling or outright abolishing cultural/ethnic differences?

I mean, the worker's struggle knows no borders and all.

De Benoist is a neo-Fascist.

t. antifa

Why don't you go beat up other lumpenproles and let the adults continue their discussion?

not really. I mean, capitalism is a completely interconnected global network as it is. Everything you own probably had brown people involved in the production process.
and there are populations that exist next to eachother and share the same rights and legal system while having distinct cultures and identities. Now sometimes there are clashes, but this is where we say universalism should win out. AKA so called "western" culture. Listen to any of zizeks talks about migrants.

You silly bastard that isn't the chart we sent to everyone. This is the top secret chart we sent to all members of the cultural marxism conspiracy. Donut let this fall into Holla Forumss cheeto hands or some genius like Sargon or Alex Jones, our plan is nearly complete.

Cultures will naturally start to merge in socialism. They are already.

What?

Socialism won't do much for that. Capitalism is what is going to destroy culture. First by allowing everyone to communicate freely over vast distances and second by forcing billions of people to move thousands of miles to find work all over the globe.

Because porky hates traditions, different cultures and wants to make the world standardized and boring.

...

Free movement of labor will cause cultures to mix. Certainly, there would be far less motivations to emigrate but it would happen nonetheless as borders whither away.

Porky wants everyone to consume. They don't care if you're Muslim or Christian or Buddhist or black or white or brown. They just care that you buy buy buy and/or work work work.

But the post I was replying to said this:
Just because the Franks were not directly responsible and had differing views on culture (moreso Gramsci, though Marcuse was one) doesn't mean there isn't a tradition that followed in part from some of their thought, that became dominant in the arts departments universities, who trained generations of students who went on to become "content creators". Even though the idea of it being a Frankfurt school overt conspiraacy is a total misnomer, they aren't irrelevant, just as Marx is not irrelevant to understanding ML.

Point is that people would probably move a lot less under socialism/communism. This is a good thing. Race doesn't exist anyways so mixing is not necessary.

Porky wants a standardized world. look around uou. Everywhere you go you have the same restaurants, same clothing stores, same hotels, same films, same music, same tv shows.
USA, UK, Germany, France, Italy. everything, everywhere. Same things, same things…

Proof of cultural marxism right here. Of course race exists.

Is cultural marxism also why you have a terabyte of (exclusively BMWF) interracial porn on your computer?

The Franks' methodology was entirely different from postmodernism. Perhaps the only case where the two overlap is Benjamin's early writings on language.

Most of what's labeled "postmodernism" is directly influenced not by the Franks but by Heidegger. Recall Adorno heavily critiqued Heidegger in Negative Dialectics.

Coming from someone who studied the humanities in college, I can say the Franks are barely touched upon. Benjamin's writings on art are used in media studies and "philosophy of art" courses, perhaps. I know one of Fromm's texts is used in upper-class social psychology. But for the most part the theorists you see in the humanities today are Derrida, Barthes, Foucault, Judith Butler, bell hooks, Gayatri Spivak, Edward Said, Julia Kristeva, nearly any black feminist or "womanist" with a shred of academic credibility gets taught, and nearly every literature critic influenced by Lacan. Everything is PoMo - I repeat, EVERYTHING is PoMo or post-structuralist.

Actually, internationalism is one major aspect of communism. The merger and abolition of nations and national distinctions is as necessary as the abolition of classes.

Race and nation are not the same thing. Like at all.

Oh look…another one that shares the porky dream of living in a boring standardized world where everywhere you go is the same. Off yourself you corrupt loving cunt.

Still, communism is internationalist. You can't have islands of communism in a sea of capitalism. The revolution must be spread.

It would be a merging of cultures which REFLECTS the will of the people, or egalitarian aims. Monotone culture under capitalism is the result of market forces completely divorced from the will of the people.

Funnily enough only during capitalism is such an scenario possible.

What the fuck is this "or" shit?

this
while immigration in itself isnt a problem
i see it as an issue where workers moving across some borders dont cause the average wage to rise, but for all wages to drop to a floor
capitalism causes this, more money for porky for so long as he can keep selling for abut the same price as before

...

Fixed that for you comrade

Haha you really are an idiot.

Who gives a fuck what the actual generic school is technically referred to outside of academic interdisciplinary semantical shit fights? (Triggered Marxists)

...

Tell me more about babbys first existentialism for literal 14 year olds.

How does simply stating the truth makes me an "antifa"…?

you sound triggered, my friend.

(selling weed, bitcoin)
(psychopath)
(got pwned by tankies, will never ever stop crying about it)
(in a shitty powerviolence band, have multiple STD's)

Nice, a statist cuck got triggered

Wow it's like you really are almost identical to smug, maladjusted ancaps except unemployable instead of IT professionals as the only key difference

What I read

It's like you can't even come up with good insults or be funny or interesting at all because you're all underage memers

No u

wew

The dumbing-down in American culture is to prepare the minds of Americans for a globalized economy.

Not a conspiracy.

Btw, the terrorism route has failed already as seen by the red terrorist groups in the 70s.

Heh

Yeah comrade, it will collapse anytime. Do people still use the term 'Late Capitalism'. How long will 'Late Capitalism' last?

You still live in your spectacular delusions of a hollywood-esque collapse, capitalism will not collapse overnight, it will be a progressive change towards anarchism-communism

freemalaysiatoday.com/category/business/2017/01/05/iif-global-debt-surges-in-2016-faces-rising-interest/

We now need 3 .25 earths to pay for the debt, it will implode beautifuclly, even better than in 2008

"Late" in late capitalism isn't the late as in "capitalism lately has been an unforgiving bitch," but the late as in "this train has been late but it can arrive any minute now."

kek. try to reduce your meme exposure

In his defense he was in a pretty shitty situation, with fascism looming over and then controlling Europe, and the USSR falling to Stalinism.

I think the Judeo-mystical stuff was more so an expression of his melancholy and desperation.

Yeah I was raised orthodox and nearly every time something disastrous happens Jews will demand everyone go out and do mitzvot to bring moshiach. That's what they did back in 2015 when Palestinians were stabbing everyone in Jerusalem.

yes. read.

this.

Cultural Marxism is real, but it's not what you think.

...

they do, they're called neoconservatives

:^)

here's your (You)

Doesn't this prove Holla Forums's point of Marxism really being a front for jewish dominion over the west?

bullshit.
>Since I set eyes on him– The feminine character, and the ideal of feminity on which it is modeled, are products of masculine society. The image of undistorted nature arises only in distortion as its opposite. Where it claims to be humane, masculine society imperiously breeds in woman its own corrective, and shows itself through this limitation implacably the master. The feminine character is a negative imprint of domination… The woman who feels herself a wound when she bleeds knows more about herself than the one who imagines herself a flower because that suits her husband.

Where's this from?

Also: feminism =/= progress

nvrmnd it's from Minima Moralia.

you forgot the part where schlomo gives us all degenerate qt's and gibmedats for killing whitey

...

Then what does because challenging gender roles in Adorno's times were very fucking "progressive"