Why aren't Socialist economics as wise and realistic as Nazi economics?

Why aren't Socialist economics as wise and realistic as Nazi economics?

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.sustecweb.co.uk/past/sustec15-5/mefo_bills.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Feder
ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Hitler and the Nazi's didn't discover slavery, it always "works" just not very well or for very long.

Ponzi scheme is what passes as wise these days?

Nazism died in the 1940s while communism is still alive and well. Wise indeed.

The Nazi economy was close to collapse in the late 1930s and basically needed the war to survive. Even if the Germans had 'won' the war, the moment the economy had turned sour, the NSDAP would've been removed from government by the army.

how pagan of you

I can't believe I just read all of that unironically
Hell damn, this is all well written but the points it makes are so hollow
What's the source for this crap?

...

le permanent wartime economy meme
Also class collaborationism only works when industrializing a nation, after that it's entirely useless to the working class

bump

The entire war economy was funded on a Ponzi scheme that gave value to notes purely because Hitler waved his magic wand and granted value to those notes. As soon as the expansion faltered the whole thing came tumbling down. Just like the fed reserve only without the centuries in built state apparatus to back it up.

archive.sustecweb.co.uk/past/sustec15-5/mefo_bills.htm

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills

You can't make this shit up.

...

Stop

The Nazi economy was built on looting and a pyramid scheme.

The only Nazi I can think of with even half a clue about economics beyond capitalist orthodoxy is Feder, and even he was sidelined by Hitler for challenging capitalism.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Feder

Where is screencap from? Metapedia??

Isn't the infograph in the OP based on Feder's ideas though?

Holla Forums never seems to be able to decide whether they support Feder's ideas or Hitler's.

I love how this is every lolbert strawman about gommunism, only apparently this dipshit really believes it.

Nazi is a type of socialism you moron.

The clue is in the name.

What a meme!

You just dont want your precious Hitler to be associated with a failure like socialism but you cant deny the truth.

Hitler all but outright admitted that the NSDAP's name was chosen primarily to get elected and wasn't socialist in the slightest, but tried to hide this by saying that the socialism everyone else was talking about was a Jewish Marxist aberration and he socialism he followed was the proper German socialism which, like everything else he believed in, was apparently some ancient Germanic tradition going back thousands of years, the knowledge of which only he seemed to be privy to and also just so happened to be indistinguishable from nationalist capitalism.

what is the economic sense in spending resources to imprion and starve part of your population when they could have been trained and sent to the front? Those german citizens were needed on the eastern front. what a waste.

He could have also made women enter the war economy, but the Nazis never did that. While in Britain, US, and Soviet Union women contributed more than half of the armament labor force. But even without that, he could have created a war time economy, but the Nazis didn't do even that.

The Nazis were not very smart, in general.

Deep down, Hitler knew Germany couldn't beat half the world solo and tried to make the war he was compelled to wage as comfy as possible.

So how come he was a socialist?

With all the big government programs and authoritarianism.

Hitler called himself a socialist because """socialism""" was all the rage in Weimar Germany.

Also,

Its worker ownership and control of the means of production.

Hitler was obsessed with the 'stab in the back' that he believed lost Germany WWI. He thought that the German people had rebelled because they were overworked and underfed, so it was essential to keep them comfortable this time round. That's why he didn't declare 'total war' until 1943 and why he didn't allow an actual total war economy until 1944.


The (NS)DAP was founded before Hitler became involved, so the association with socialism wasn't anything to do with him. And he probably joined originally because the army told him to spy on the party, so we can't infer anything about his attraction to the name of socialism. It was something he was stuck with.

I get why he called himself a socialist but Im asking why he implemented so many socialist policies if, like you say he wasnt a socialist?

Compelled to wage by his insane worldview and conspiracy theories, I meant.

He didn't implement any socialist policies.

ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf

I'll assume you mean SocDem policies, like the ones Sweden is so famous for. The answer is that buying off the population and keeping them somewhat content keeps your regime in place. Even ultra-reactionary Otto von Bismarck understood that.

He did loads you moron.

Well, his party did. But Hitler certainly didnt stop them.

Yeah thats precisely what I meant.

Why did he do all that if he wasnt a socialist?

PS Sorry for leddit spacing.

Did you read the PDF I linked?

...

Looked there in their search and it ain't there.