Why was there never anyone added to the "pantheon" after Mao? Wouldn't Castro be a suitable person shown after him?

Why was there never anyone added to the "pantheon" after Mao? Wouldn't Castro be a suitable person shown after him?

Mao significantly advanced ML theory and gained large ideological traction through-out the world.

Castro was never a theoretician nor really a Marxist until he met Che.

Che had novel political ideas derived from French intellectuals but they basically amounted to an inferior Maoism that could never be replicated outside of Cuba.

The only one the could be feasibly added to the Pantheon is Hoxha but that usually means denying the legacy of Mao

Too little work in the field of theory by comrade Castro. Even Stalin had some contributions.

complete

Because the development of Marxism-Leninism-CreepyCultism was halted after Mao's death.

mao and stalin should be removed tbh

Authoritarian ""socialism"" just needs to be forgotten.

Lenin as well.

I'm the original author of this image. It's pretty wild seeing it going around so many years after the fact since I made it in like, 2010.

Anarchism introduce it's own form of authority, the fact that your utopia will have a slight ethical code to live by introduces the need of an ethical state.

Now plz stop living.

no, it is you that needs to stop living

The only thing marxists are are people that know of communist memes but have never read. Any literate person would see anarchists are where its at. Read Conquest of bread, what is property, and god and the state.
After reading all that, could you ever justify the spooks you support?

Engels needs to go too.

And fuck Marx, honestly.

Time to go, revisionist scum.

This.


The oceans will be turned into lemonade!

Yeah fuck off anti-intellectual liberal roleplaying fuck, take your spooks and shove em up lenins mumified motherfucking corpse's asshole

Go drink your koolaid, anarkiddy.

fuck off with your shitty ass memes thats all you got you fucking mindless cultist. You'll say you got theory but all you got is motherfucking memes, think for your goddamn self, what fucking role is the state gonna play in seizing the means of production, it aint you dip, it only seizes your power.

...

Wew lad

now you fucked up

Next person should have something to top 1.4 billion PRC.

Besides, only Maoists put Mao as the 5th person. Orthodox ML stops at Stalin.

If you read some actual history - yes. Anarchism in practice is a mess.

It's a shame Marx and Engels had to be included in that. Even Lenin is a bit too good to always have to be put next to Stalin and Mao

Anarchists just get killed by fascists.

PUT TITO ON IT

how is this a viable criticism of anarchism?

>>>/gulag/

Okay.

What do the kanji characters mean?

why are there so many Holla Forumsmrades?

The Nutshack is a meme you dip.

Remove the last 2, add Rosa

Rosa contributed fuck all.

What great contribution did Stalin make to Marxist theory other than having a personality cult?

In that case, maybe Prachanda or Gonzalo would fit better. What say, maoists?

Actions weigh louder than words, which is why people don't see "someone who furthered theory" when they see mao and Stalin

Personally I think ideological fetishism and deification like this is counter productive and should be stopped

Marxist-Leninism.

Who is that? I haven't watched anime in years.

...

dogmato-revisionists you mean :^)
Why don't you put hohxa then ? Oh right I know, that's because he didn't do shit except swallow stalin's cum :^)
love u tho

None. Many ML parties, despite being "Stalinist", carry a banner with Marx, Engels and Lenin only because of this very reason.
Maoists on the other hand consider Mao as an addition to ML, i'd rather call it revisionism, but whatever.

The reason why Stalin still does appear in this line is simply that he was the first party leader to really implement and go through with creating a state as invisioned by Marx, Engels and Lenin. His era was the construction of socialism and making first steps of developing the economic system of socialism.

Yes, Stalin is important because of practice, not theory.

But saying that Stalin made no contributions to theory whatsoever is a wee bit over the top.

...

it's just what it said originally, which I believe is "long live marxism-leninism and mao zedong thought"

The problem is anarchism isn't fucking possible. Enjoy your interfering bourgie states embargoing you, bourgies disseminating false information, and population that still largely follows liberal ideology

Because that shit is fucking retarded and the personality worship of political theoreticians and leaders needs to be completely forgotten about. M-L's never will until they fade into their well deserved obscurity because their entire world view revolves around authority worship.

Yes cause creating a state apparatus that enforces ideological edicts is the best way to awaken class consciousness.

Yes cause foreign elites aren't going to care at all that their foreign capital was just seized and they won't try and interfere with anything

And a coercive apparatus is going to halt such things? The Russian revolution had already degenerated into a bureaucracy and state capitalism by the time the had to force to defend themselves. Historically speaking, it appears that stateless formations are better at defending socialist economic structures than states, which recreate pre-revolution conditions. Give me an example of a state where the workers had actual control over the means of production that was able to defend itself better than stateless ones? It seems like anarchist revolutions could defend themselves just as well if not better than statist socialisms like the short-lived Marcist states of post-WW1 germany and the workers councils during the Hungarian uprising.

Statist 'socialist' regimes seem to only be able to defend themselves in as much as they crush any form of real existing socialism. The closest you have is yugoslavia but the stafe interferred with workplace democracy quite a bit there.

Sorry for misspellings on mobile and high atm.