Whats the worst communist idelogy

Its socialism with Chinese characteristics.

Other urls found in this thread:

liberationnews.org/home-page/about/
cpgb-ml.org/index.php?secName=books
newworker.org/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

it's Nazbol.

national bolshevism

Ban all nazbols

Anti-nationalism

Trotskyism, it's a neo-con gateway ideology.

nazbols

MLM and Nazbol

nazbols.

Buttmad nazbol cuck detected

turd worldism

DELET THIS

Buttmad labor aristocratic cuck detected

sweatshop/slum dweller fetishist faggot detected

The holy trinity:
Nazbol
Juche
Third Worldism

Trotskyism

...

Hot as fuck.
You're a jealous NEET.

anarcho-communism, anything with anarcho is trash.
also Trotskyism is shit.

Nope.

Anything with anarcho attached to it.

This

Marxism

Opposite of this, anything other than Trotsky or anarchism is equally shit.

Anarcho-"lol ACAB and orginisation is statist"-communism

Easily Hoxhaism.

Antideutsch

CIA is not a valid communist ideology.

Trots and NazBols
both already have their warm place in my gulag

ultraleftism and revisionist tankism.

Stalinism

Juche

...

also Stalinism

Nazbol

This.

Bordigaism

leftcom

...

Liberation Theology

Christian communism.

Anything moneyless. Basically guaranteed to be filled with pot smoking layabouts and arts students who think their artistic vision is God's gift to the planet.

So just communism?

any "marxist" ideology that relies on a strongman dictator or a vanguard to make all the choices for the proletariat.

From worst to best

Anarcho-Trans-Humanism

Trotskyism
Maoism
Marxism-Leninsim

National Bolshevism
Anarcho-communism

Anarcho-collectivism

Mutualism

Market Socialism

Posadism
Juche

Would you mind explaining how exactly you are going to accomplish Revolution without Vanguard?

Having full-fledged Socialist state before the Revolution is not an option, btw.

Give the MoP to the workers
Abolish the goverment
Stablish a strong army that respond to outisde forces

See Rojava.

Leave Hoxha alone, will you?

> This was nothing but an anti-Marxist, capitalist logic. Our Party opposed Khrushchevite revisionism heroically, just as it had opposed Yugoslav revisionism earlier, and just as it fought resolutely against any other variant of revisionism, but it did not sell out and never will sell out to imperialism or anyone else, because as long as a party considers itself and respects itself as a genuine Marxist-Leninist party, whatever the conditions and situations it is in, it never allows itself to be bought or sold, but resolutely pursues its course, the course of uncompromising struggle against imperialism, revisionism and reaction.

I just can't give you up.

Statements like this are easy.

Would you mind give some specifics in this thread?


How exactly would the MoP be given, for example?

I'm trying to collect general ideas people have about Revolution.

Anarchist has been extremely enlightening with his defence of Parliamentarianism. AnCap on the other hand, apparently wants junta.

Rojava didn't accomplish Revolution yet. Much more importantly, it's not an answer.

what?

socialism with X characteristics
hoxhaism
market socialism
revisionism
national bolshevism
trotskyism
all anarchos that aren't just anarchist or ancom
MLM
third worldism
juche
stalinism
tankyism
vanguardism
socialism in one country
posadism
mutualism

and worst of all

social democracy

Whats wrong with market socialism?

proletariat democracy instead of party democracy?

Pick one.

Worldwide Mad Deadly Communist Gangster Computer Godism

Can you read?

You can't have elections across the nation before the Revolution.

There are better conclusions to be made from questions raised by LTV

pure ancom is total garbage

What are you then?

Trotskyism.

Name one political difference between Trotskyist groups and Marxist-Leninist groups in the 21st century. I'll wait.

Trot praxis is to sell as many newspapers as possible and that will somehow create socialism.
ML praxis is parading with portraits of Stalin and in general alienating anyone from the idea of socialism.

not a serious response

Selling newspapers and literature is not a political difference. It is about logistics and party-finances. The RCP, a large Maoist party in the US sells their paper at every opportunity.
More examples of non-trotskyist newspapers and literature for sale:
liberationnews.org/home-page/about/
cpgb-ml.org/index.php?secName=books
newworker.org/

Try again.

They are the neocon and neolib subbranches of cointelpro respectively.

Either you're trolling, or are on some Infowars tin-foil hat nonsense. Either way, fuck off.

M-L groups are more likely to defend "real socialism" like Syria and North Korea. It's not a hard and fast rule though, and tbh you're right that the difference between Trotskyism and M-L is increasingly less relevant in a post-USSR world.

they're both shit. i'm neither

I'm sorry to crush your dreams, but that's one of two possible end-points for the human species. The other is extinction.
Humans will not be able to contribute meaningfully to any serious endeavors in the far future. We will be as useful to the AIs running everything as horses are to NASA. Humans will simply be left behind in a world of ever increasing intelligence. At best they will keep us around like pets because they derive pleasure from seeing us enjoying ourselves.

The thing is, I don't even think this is unique to ML groups. The Revolutionary Tendency, Sparts, and the SWP are all into this kind of stuff as well. I think of it as the "Enemy of my enemy is my comrade" mindset.

Trotsky and Stalin cocksucking are both cancerous IMO. Move on people, the USSR is gone.

It's third-worldism

woohoo that's not what I thought I was posting

ML

Sounds leftcom or ancom.

I'll believe it when the day comes. Until that day, you're essentially counting your chickens before they hatch and banking on science fiction to fill in the gaps in your political philosophy.