Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_economics

how do you feel about parecon.
I kind of like this idea but I still find remuneration to be a tough question
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_economics

Utopianist nonsense

even under state socialism this should be experimented with.
what if we took the landmass the size of a town, put some MOP on it and volunteers, and see if you can develop a workplace along these principals. Try varying degrees of equality in pay and decision making. Perhaps some may fail, but it would yield interesting information, sociologists and economists could study it.

disgusting

Is this the system where everyone basically needs to make a list of all the goods you want over the next year like 800 rolls toilet paper, then the optimal summed allocation gets voted on? Because,

I prefer Kevin Divine's approach.


That's one of the "participatory economics" proposals, but it's retarded.


ML's are literally non-entities since they ruined socialism.

It's shit. Also, name?

You're a fucking idiot. Objectification doesn't even real.


Sauce, m8.

it's almost like I finally understand where feminism came from

End this meme

disgusting

i see the brocialists have arrived

Completely retarded. There is no such thing as a coordinator class, what the people they mention do is still labor and thus they are still part of the working class.

You're retarded, if it's the case that simply finding someone attractive or sexually appealing is objectification then every human interaction is implicitly objectifying whether it's because you don't find them appealing or do.

YOU better to be memeing

Kill yourself you fucking SJW.

requires retarded level of bureaucracy
t. anarchist

Let's put aside for a moment whether you want to call coordinators a class. A society without private ownership of the means and production and with a strong division between planning and doing physical work is at risk of turning capitalist, with the capitalist class arising from the coordinators.

I would argue that the Soviet Union wasn't capitalism and they did have a bureaucracy of coordinators that weren't strictly speaking a class (there were barriers like no inheritance of MOP), and that the Soviet Union didn't fall apart because of economic inefficiency, but rather a faction of the coordinators changed the system to their benefit, becoming capitalists in the process.

disgusting

there is nothing wrong with objectification, faggot
if i was a good looking man, i wouldn't mind being objectified and neither do majortiy of good looking women
it's a meme made up by ugly feminist to feel better about themselves

t. SJW

I'm not judging her. I just said that I found her sexually attractive. If you can do that without looking at someone's looks, then please explain why I should do the same. Until then, I'll let my dick decide when it comes to dick matters.

Inferior to market Anarchism, no reason why the populace should interviene on individual decisions

...

That's basically the definition of Utopianism.

ha!

It's like Marx hasn't deal with then 200 years ago.

Parecon is so retarded, it's almost like parody.

My favorite part is when different plans are packaged together and everyone votes on them.

Unrealistic.

Not everyone can or wants to be the coordinator, even though they have to be promoted to be involved.

The way a cooperative works is they appoint/hire one person to run the ship, and they vote collectively on proposal or changes in direction, while the appointed captain executes them and forms new plans, as is his jobs. The workers are free to read the paperwork on their own if they wish so. They can fire the captain is he does a shit job.