...
The ego is the essence of my ontology
Luis Kelly
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
books.google.dk
twitter.com
Cooper Lewis
they don't even know about sinthome's
Christopher Perez
Jaxson Stewart
Or coming into being, for that matter.
Nice vid. Agamben is seriously underappreciated.
Leo Williams
wew
Michael Bailey
I wish that smug zizekians would be less incurious and actually read the people they think they oppose.
Carter Wright
Indeed, he wasn't around before the concept of the mirror phase was even theorized by Freud and thus all meme philosophy like his was rendered obsolete and to forever be the idealist garbage it truly is and was, forever to sit in the dustbin of history.
Zachary Perry
That's the thing I don't get.
There really is no conflict between Lacan and Stirner aside from definition, but they still insist on pushing this meme.
It makes me wonder who's actually do it.
Jackson Cook
Shiggy my diggy m8
Evan Clark
So you now realize that Stirner could never have "admitted to" acknowledging the mirror phase in forming the subject's ontology because Stirner never lived to read Freud?
Che vuoi?
Eli Foster
Does it matter?
There really isn't a conflict there to begin with, which was the point.
Michael Thomas
Read from without doubt culture has made me powerful.
This is where Stirner proposes that the ego is socially constructed.
Please stop being proud that you're ignorant and so smug you've grown incurious.
Jaxon Kelly
It does. If you claim that Stirner acknowledges the mirror phase but don't know that Stirner never lived to see the theory of the mirror phase come into being, it means you've both not read Stirner because he can literally not have mentioned it, and you've not read Freud or even acknowledge the most basic concepts of psychoanalysis.
Michael Russell
Again, Stirner doesn't claim this is the case.
Isaiah Bailey
No, but Stirner proposes a set of personal ethics which posit that one's ego is the essence of their ontology and that one can merely act in accordance to its impulses. This doesn't happen, ever.
Jacob Anderson
Where does he do this?
point to it.
Mason Stewart
Stirner's ego as a concept was ambiguous and open to change from individual to individual. But the point was that it encompasses all a person is
Levi Wright
Well, no he doesn't. He makes no claim as to the origin of Will, except to indeed say it might be partly cultural.
If you can find anything to contradict that, please point to that.
Noah Howard
Where?
You talk a lot, but never cite anything.
Christian Ross
Someone who is really perma butthurt for some reason. It takes alot of anger and ignorance to keep pushing it in hope to hop on the stirner train to let your meme get some traction. Fuckton of people here actually tried to get traction for their snowflake narative by dismissing whatever is popular.
Isaac Jones
Wtf I love Freudposter now
Grayson Brooks
wtf I love my ego now
Carson Moore
...
Matthew Fisher
What's the difference between the symbolic and imaginary ?
Luis Ramirez
p. 101-106: Imaginary
p. 212-217: Symbolic
(p. 168-173: Real)
Hudson Rogers
tl;dr ?
Zachary Jones
So i act according to your impulses? Top kek!
Gavin Morgan
So the whole mirror phase is utterly irrelevant
Nolan Garcia
I've heard all this before, but I still don't get what it has to do with Stirner.