How many COINTELPRO people do you think browse this board?

How many COINTELPRO people do you think browse this board?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=uS6Y3t7kxHE
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I will say 3.

For one actual agent, how many genuine posters who lapped up their bullshit?

like 4 or 5 bunkerfags

Do you really think they bother with this place at all?

You know one guy, but don't know the other?

I assume it's around the number of leftcom and trot posters.

I FOUND PRICKLY!!!

Probably 3-4, including non-American agencies.

Posting? None, since this board does nothing IRL

Technically it's 4 but Joe is a fucking slacker so it doesn't count.

Well i know I'm here.

I do it for free.

Anyone who keeps posting this god ham fisted image every damn image comparing feminism in totality with neonazis, and implying "workers of the world," fighting for the cause aren't incredibly feminist to begin with.

I really do think that most of you are geniune, but I think the constant battle between feminism and anti-feminism is a false dichotomy that needs to be nipped in the bud.

If you don't like it, bar none across the world, when the world outside the west is fighting for it, the workers of the world, argue it out why. It shouldn't be that difficult.

As it stands this generates nothing but class antipathy and for that I give you the gold cointelpro star.

...

Back to reading

You've been shitting up this board since a good month now, derailing threads and repel everybody who might find this place and is genuinely open for serious left-wing politics.

You should have been banned by now and you know it. Problem is Holla Forums loves bait and probably is also turned on by a dominating AnFem but trust me, once the cum is dry, everybody wants you and your shitty strawmaning - like comparing identity politics to serious socialist feminists in this thread - to be gone. You are mildly talented as a troll and not even funny.

I assume off this statement you've been shitting longer.

Just

F
i
l
t
e
r

I never engage in banter over 50 to 60 posts with shitposting Nazi flags like you do. If you are such a badass asian chick IRL that you claim to be you'd not find the means to satisfy your ego on fucking Holla Forums, there are better and more narcissistic social media outlets than this - the fact you do it nonetheless just implies you are seriously autistic.

Yeah whatever. Not an argument.

I'm stubborn.


I'm not like other girls…..


I was banned yesterday for about a day. I didn't give a shit. I just did something else. Point is, it's down time for me and I like to spend my down time alone. I thought this board was a bit of a haven for collective interests I have. It still is, but then we have people like you who want to question everything I do for nothing.


How many anons have made it their lives to posting on image boards, hm? This isn't my first rodeo, I've been on the net for quite a long time now


Quit bitching about me more than you bitch about Capitalism and filter me. Fair trade, no?

anfem is my favorite trip

...

You are gross. That is all.

On a side note:


I just learned yesterday that Vietnamese have the highest levels of autism. Holla Forums eternally BTFO.

Fair enough, but you answer race baiting with race baiting and giving them the (you) that they want.
Naturally, you are on an imageboard.
You are trying to get yourself into the victim role now. Truth is though, you aren't dumb, you know exactly what this place is and what it is not, and you are one who attacks unnecessarily like in this thread. Nobody judges you for what you are and to be entirely honest with you, we may need girls like you but you are seriously pushing it because you haven't shown much integrity.
Are you the AnFem that we had arround half a year ago? That one had her fair share of banter but was regularly bringing in nice well-read input.
It's not like I don't appreciate quality shitposting but I feel there is a severe lack of irony behind what you are doing.
Everybody who is here bitches about capitalism. But your omnipresence here had an effect on the substance of this board.

Uhm.. did you just change your flag? Seriously?

Tankie just shut the fuck up and ignore the anfem.
You people always ruin threads with "muh tripfriends".

Don't recall tankies shitting up threads this much besides a few one-liners. Besides, I probably ignored her the most considered how everybody was triggered by her (negatively or positively) and this other pirate guy from /liberty/.

tip top kek

I'm more concerned about the Holla Forumsyp infestation tbh

I like you and agree with you. This boards insistence on hating feminism of all kinds is ironically very divisive idPol I think based around some homoerotic 20th century revolutionary fantasy

as many as browse Holla Forums
It is a major political board on the only Anonymous imageboard after 4chan that has critical mass.

Feminism of all kinds is IDPOL and rejecting IDPOL is not IDPOL that is some of the worst logic ever used.
Like not liking homosexuals means you have repressed sexuality of the homoerotic kind.
Speaking of the OP; how many cointelpro are in this thread? I just identified at least one.

spotted the cointelpro

Marxist Feminism > Marxism
Focus on more than just workers.

user, absolutely everybody who posts here is COINTELPRO. It's like that 21 jump street shit where it's time to make the arrests and they find out everyone there's an informant.


First our stance on idpol nonsense is because we're sexually frustrated straight guys, and now it's because we're all homos?

Maybe we need a thread: Who not COINTELPRO here?

I think it's just wishful thinking on their part. Asian Cunt Trip already admitted she has a pegging fetish.

cointelpro notice me, i want to lurk chans for a living

Agent Johnson here
We only recruit transhumanistposters because their unique skills in machine learning really help our surveillance program.

Why would they give a shit about this place? Currently, there's no hope in the United States of America for communism gaining force, so Holla Forums isn't worth checking out for them.

Next to zero I reckon.

Certainly far less than concern trolls from Holla Forums.

One of the things that makes this board so nice is the absence of conspiracy mongering btw.

t. philistine
Read Bordiga and fucking spread that knowledge.

youtube.com/watch?v=uS6Y3t7kxHE

Your narrow expectations for our infiltration doomed you from the start.

We have one confirmed 50 cent army poster on here, so Im going with 5 from all countries.

plz ban tripfags that aren't: A.W, Yui, and the others that read.

just go to options and add trips to your filter.
the absence of wannabe D-level ecelebs makes the leftypol experience much better

thnx

hav some thiccc

...

COINTELPRO hasn't existed for years.

Gee who could it be.

Everyone who calls themselves a feminist.

Sure that's why the only communist who is a fugitive in Cuba is a feminist. Because she's cointelpro.

And you aren't.

Maybe it's not feminism we hate but tripfagging cunts who insist on shitposting thread-derealing science denialism in every fucking thread.

how feminist of you

The only science denialism is people who are against the facts I say.

It's more of a battle between socialism and bourgeois liberalism. We must defend our comrades from sexism and racism, but in the end there is no war but class war.

I like how every single time anyone bothers to defend feminism, two dozen Sargon-worshipping cunts start accusing all feminists of being liberals, regardless of how many times that claim is refuted. It's like trying to get Holla Forums to seriously argue what exactly is wrong with Jews.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I just never encounter this "brocialism" that people are complaining about. I don't know what kind of socialist wouldn't acknowledge the truths of Intersectionality, but any offensive action with any long-term goal other than building class consciousness, organizing the working class, and attacking the ruling class's base of power is nothing but bailing out a sinking ship.

Capitalism creates sexism and racism faster than you can directly confront it. Identity politics is only successful in creating reaction. Anything but class war strategy plays directly into the hands of pro-capitalist liberalism.

I don't know what "brocialism" is, so don't talk about that to me.
How does this apply to things like honour killings? If it is a part of class struggle or it isn't, but you still support fighting it, then you should also support fighting many other things lesser in magnitude of consequences (like le wage gap :—–DDDDDDDD). If you don't care for it, then good luck trying to explain to women how you're better than ISIS and how it's totally not divisive. There is no third alternative if you choose to act in good faith.
Stop with this false dichotomy. It's not one or the other. Who the fuck says it is? It's a pure meme that if you are a socialist, then you must absolutely avoid doing anything at all about xenophobia, and people who repeat this meme are often found in suspicious proximity with Holla Forumsyps.
Honour killings and racial segregation laws are both technically part of idpol. Just saying.

That's a good point, though, and I think it's important. This is why, to engage in revolutionary action more effectively, I think we should categorize our actions as offensive or defensive. We must act defensively to protect exploited comrades from the evils of capitalism, of course. But this can never, ever free them from exploitation. To focus exclusively on defense is to lose - you are, in fact, allowing these people to remain in their chains whatever your intentions may be. At worst, these sorts engage in these actions purely to make themselves feel better about benefiting from western capitalism with no intention of ever actually changing our system (as modern dinner-party liberals do, which is why you probably get called a liberal quite often by certain people).


It's not a false dichotomy - it's simply that the reality of the situation is more complex than you're currently willing to acknowledge. The more complex class structure of Intersectionality is an important concept, but class war remains the only path to humanity's emancipation. Building economic class tension and consciousness must receive by far the majority of our energy and effort.


You need to realize that the people who are telling you that we must focus on attacking the capitalist power base DO still care about these issues. They just think your strategies for handling them will inevitably fail.

Nobody speaks of exclusive focus on Holla Forums but butthurt incels. Stop with this meme already.
I like it how you never assume that some of you may be acting in bad faith, and when the point is brought up, you discard it without any consideration.

My point is that there is a difference between a winning strategy and a losing strategy. It is folly to believe that one does not care about an issue just because one does not put one's head down and charge directly at it at full speed. We MUST defend our comrades from the racism and sexism, that is perfectly true. But the only way to FREE them from racism and sexism (eventually) is to win the class struggle and transcend capitalism. A strategy that alleviates the symptoms of exploitation but prolongs it in the long run actually HURTS the people it was designed to protect.


I don't assume that. Because we have all been born into a capitalist world, some of us may hold on to conservative social prejudices or a belief that the prejudices one has personally experienced take precedence over all other forms of exploitation. But I'm not sure what it would mean for a socialist to be acting in "bad faith" on this issue (they want to see a racist socialist society in which women are kept in their place? I just don't understand this analysis.)


Not at all. I genuinely want to understand this from your perspective. Please explain it to me. I think that our initial assumptions may both be wrong - you think I don't care about social issues that don't affect me and I think you're someone who hasn't discarded liberalism and is therefore likely to derail a new socialist movement by playing directly into the hands of reactionaries and preventing us from striking at the ruling class. But maybe we're both wrong.

I never said that. You so consistently keep making insulting assumptions about me that I fail to see how you are not acting in bad faith. I am done talking with you. Have a good day.

fliter asian cunt trip

Well, I'm asking you to explain it to me and I genuinely want to understand. I don't know why you'd simply refuse to.

People who think that all struggle for the rights of women and minorities is "idpol" should probably get a fucking clue. The picture in OP is one of the shittiest strawmans imaginable and completely dismissive of for example how the women's struggle has been historically linked with radical worker's emancipation and remains so in the third world. ps: outside your American/West Euro bubble even LGBT is much more radical in focus.

You just need to separate Hillary Clinton-esque bourgeois liberal feminism from the real struggle for women's rights and equality throughout the world and I'm 100% on board. We need to distinguish these two things and draw a sharp line between genuine emancipatory socialism and pro-capitalist "let's put more female characters in video games instead of fighting the ruling class" liberalism.

Where do you see "the women's struggle" mentioned in OP's image?

I see an obnoxious activist obsessed with language policing; not emancipation; perhaps it is this particular (and, despite "strawman" claims, very much extant) tendency in feminism, not "all struggle for the rights of women and minorities" which is being criticized?

If the activist pictured represents all feminism, then feminism is a spent political force long since shorn of any revolutionary potential.

At the same time you aren't saying that sexism does not exist in modern society or especially outside the west, right? That's what some people in this thread aren't understanding, I think. We are concerned with counter-revolutionary liberalism diverting us away from attacking capitalism with the standard bourgeois humanitarianism.

This argument is NOT about whether sexism faced by women matters or not - we all agree that it DOES matter very much. This is about socialism being fundamentally revolutionary and about ACTUALLY solving the world's problems. Anyone who just wants to show how much they care about an individual issue without confronting or modifying their own economic muh privilege still lacks an understanding of socialism and class struggle.

Prickly is actually cointelpro, and I have proof, after information passed to him and only him eventually came back to me from a different liberal source. Retribution will come soon.

you done fucked up comrade

you have fucked up…your posts were clean up until this one…good luck, we're all alphabets, you don't really have any friends.

10-25%

Yeah, you're correct. A little anecdote from Chile. I attended a pride march a few years ago, during my formative years politically, I was struck by the absurd party atmosphere of the entire event (very much like the pride events you see in the west), that is, until this group showed up, making noise, waving red flags and yelling about how this was a protest, not a party, talking about our dead, placards about the poverty of Chilean trans women. They were a smaller group within the event (Chile has, unfortunately, copied a lot of the worst trends of liberalism), but I find that is the kind of shit I want. I want a movement for women and LGBT people that is about above all things socialist, that is concerned about proletarian solidarity and the struggle for a better world. I firmly believe there's a basis for it, but so long as we keep listening to bourgeois talking heads who tell us that we need to vote for the next neoliberal "progressive" for muh gay rights and muh feminism we will never achieve shit. Bourgeois feminism and bourgeois LGBT politics are for the right of rich members of these populations to be part of the capitalist elite, nothing else.