2016

But it's true.

Why not just link something directly from the CIA website? It would probably be more interesting and insightful then that garbage CIA mouthpiece shitrag.

you need to go

What the fuck is this shit? Is Vice jumping on the anti-'brocialist' bandwagon now and proving that idpol and anti-'brocialism' is actually liberalism, due to Vice being a bunch of fucking liberals?

Tagline for Vice should be: Young and Gay, in Langley Va.

Holy shit I went full dumbfuckery for a second, because it gets worse.

From the article

They consider Russell "give your enemy flowers" Brand a socialist. Jesus fucking christ, I'm going to either need more beer or stronger alcohol for the next four years.

Sip moonshine

...

Best idea I've heard all week.

...

...

Women really do ruin everything by thinning it out and making it more feckless.

Any movement that actually wants to be revolutionary should keep them carefully sequestered to prevent them from affecting the spirit, ideology, and morale.

>>>Holla Forums
>>>/r9k/
>>>/mgtow/
>>>/cuckold/

Defend their e-honour valiantly!

There's a screencap that goes with this one. Someone post a screencap.

This. White middle class women are among the most muh privileged of all.

Pretending I'm a white knight doesn't make you any less of a reactionary faggot

It's further up in the thread

You have to go back

They're right though.

Return to pol shithead

It's not reactionary to point out the empirically observable fact that women are themselves inherently status quo, reactionary, conservative, etc. They always act on the basis of personality and feeling rather than ideological commitment.

Just look at how they've perverted the left into a faggy Tumblr pastime for themselves, based on hierarchical competitions to see who is best at virtue signalling and affecting phony sympathy for trannies. Women's suffrage is responsible for the bulk of modern statism, because they see the state as their All-Provider Daddy in the Sky who can fix all problems by legislating against them.

Sounds like mommy issues tbh. Do 3 Hail Marys.

Thanks for destroying leftism.

Awful gender.

You should go back to pol. You'd be more comfortable among the rest of your delusional ilk.

"do you wear shoes? brozialist"

Reactionary?

Maybe don't post while you're on your period.

If it's your 'leftism' that's being destroyed then it deserves to be destroyed tbqh

I've co-organised two unions with national affiliation and I've published articles on Horkheimer for Jacobin.

Me: 1 (actual leftist)
Women: 0 (pathetically crying on the internet that someone disagreed with them, and praying Daddy authority comes along to fix it by banning everything they don't like)

I didn't say you were a virgin. I implied the opposite, motherfucker :v)

It's not reactionary to point out the historically observable fact that women are themselves at the forefront of revolution, the crucible of change, poetry, etc. They form the majority of religious iconography, related to that of the earth and the sea, in the sense that all three are the wombs and the wells of life. To be born is to emerge from the mother's womb; to die is to return to the earth, the sea, and so on. Mothers are supposed to be anchors of shelter, warmth, nourishment. On the other hand they may, of necessity, run the risk of suppressing their children for proper rearing and occasion for learning.

Yes, you're a reactionary piece of cocksnot. If you don't like it try being less loathesome.

Even if those things are true it doesn't make you any less of a spooked reactionary.

Jesus Christ. Could you point to a female Kant, Plato, Beethoven, instead? Does it always have to be about your vagina, and how men intrinsically have to value your biological functions?

Contentless posts from a contentless gender.

I've also actually read Stirner, Feuerbach, and Marx and Engels, while you haven't.

Please continue to roleplay that you are a leftist by using words you learned online.

I hate to be that guy but how come no one on the Left things "daddy issues" is a good retort or sees that as some sort of insult. Like its just assumed that Dad's are more likely to abuse their kids and therefore that's not funny.

My girlfriend's mother was horribly abusive so she really does her best to avoid her mom and act as if she were dead. I know a lot of people in similar situations with horrible mothers but their not allowed to express their pain/anger openly because of the whole "mothers are sacred cause they popped you out of their hole" sentimentality

I know this really has nothing to do with what your debating, but I was wondering if you or anyone else had any thoughts on this?

*thinks

(You)

It's a shame that reading these things hasn't improved your character at all. Maybe you can write an article someday on not being such an awful individual.

Nice strawwomyn.

Kant is shit (and one of the biggest "status quo" shits to come out of philosophy so, hilarious; no wonder now that we only have the greatest point of culmination for intellectuals in critics and sniveling little imageboard creeps), but whatever, fine: Mary Wallstonecraft, Christine de Pizan, Hannah Arendt, Ayn Rand, et al.
Does it always have to be about your penis and how women are extrinsically devaluing your biological functions? Does it matter whether men do? This was your saying, not mine.

Amazing. My posts are so powerful that they compel idiots to prove my points for me.

for

I'll give you Ardent but the rest of your post is a pointless mixture of you trying to flex l33t philosophy muscle you don't have, interspersed with "ur a fuckin loser omg."

And you're using Big League Semicolons now; so we know you're having a high-level intellectual discussion. Embarrassing poseur.

It's better to say this towards naive girls.

Arendt, oops. Just wrote a paper on her theory of history vis-a-vis Benjamin's!

Here we see my point manifesting itself in reply. The man only knows himself to be a critic because he can't enjoy anything, yet at the same time enjoys everything.

Parents are a spook. You don't owe your genetic forebears any more than what you owe a stranger in the street. Even if your mother is a saint she isn't great entitled to anything from you. If you were to ascribe any virtue to the fact that they birthed you, it's undoubtedly outweighed by all the uncountable offspring they were unwilling or unable to have.

...

Contentless post. But hey, we could actually talk about Wollstonecraft. Did you know she said that woman's condition is equivalent to the bourgeois condition: spoiled and atrophied by the "wealth" of male affections? It's ion chapter four or five if I recall.

If you ever actually read Wollstonecraft, you might amend your
stance. Systemic kowtowing is precisely what Wollstonecraft felt rendered femininity feckless.

You aren't icky for being a man. You're 'icky' because of the shitty things you think and say.

For such an apparently vapid observation it sure does upset you. Goodness, I wonder why.

What upsets me is what I posted earlier in the thread. Women are spoiled children and reflexive authoritarians who need people to agree with them for emotional reasons. They're bad at philosophy and bad at ideological commitment for that reason.

No one's asking you to do anything. You're acting out of an imaginary cage, and the more you flail the more you can confirm its burden. I do not have to bend to your level of argumentation about the merits of this or that philosopher. You instead do exactly as you accuse with "systemic kowtowing" as I should follow and describe myself like you read your books and did so well in your studies.

Stop trying to type in fancy prose, please. You sound like an algorithmically generated parody. You're inflating every sentence with unnecessary shit, like "You're grandiloquently loquacicizing every sentential utterance with induberantly unnecessariations!"

It's actually making my asshole pucker in embarrassment for you. Like, you're causing me fucking anguish in real life.

Which is bullshit, and as a perveyor of bullshit you shouldn't be surprised when people criticize the unpleasant aura of noxious vapors you emit.

Write an article for Jacobin perhaps on how hard your ideological vendetta against a whole imaginary group of people is.

Good. That is all anyone deserves: anguish.

See, you're still doing it. Are you roleplaying as a D&D wizard on a forum in another tab, or something? You're crossing the streams!

You're also having a meltdown. I told you not to post while you're on your period.

No you're right truly you are an intellectual giant.

I suspect the reason women won't fuck you is because of how you think and behave.

This is how I already knew your level of argumentation didn't include honesty about your position nor others'. Just a torrent of insults and a dumb collusion of (You)s that don't belong together. It's almost like talking to a schizophrenic.

Amazing. My posts are so powerful that they compel idiots to prove my points for me.

Wait, deja vu.

...

Two chicks at the same time.

kek

I have completely destroyed these two IRL upset Tumblr women. They've been reduced to patting each other on the back.

Why do you roleplay as a leftist on the internet if you have horrible knowledge of left-wing philosophy? Wouldn't you be better off spending this time reading, or something?

He says as he pats himself on the back.
If only the internet were a game of king of the hill.

Why do you roleplay as a philosopher if you have no arguments?

I enjoy ironic beats from the 10s, come at me, Vice

youtube.com/watch?v=2h0qzlP5Y3w

Because I'm being paid $36,000 USD right now to study Philosophy for a living at an Ivy+ institution, with multiple peer-reviewed publications in philosophy, and you're a fat angry woman on the Internet.

No matter what you type in response to this, no matter how you try to pass it off and look cool in this empty thread that no one is reading except you and I at this point, you know my life is cooler than yours. You know I'm smarter than you. You even know I'm better at typing than you. And in ten years, I'll be a tenured leftist intellectual, and you'll either give up your roleplaying, or still be merely pretending.

I have never felt this powerful. It's like we're embodying our primordial gender roles. You are completely cowed and submissive, clawing at my chest ineffectually by calling me a loser and saying "nuh-uh!," and I'm basically raping you.

Please continue.

Plato would be so jealous. Surely philosophy has come such a long way that it can be measured in piles upon piles of money. Virtue in aristocracy, as they say.

This is probably the most pathetic thing I've read on leftypol in a long time.

does brocialism make leftypol a reactionary board?

(You)

ITT misogybro is sadly proven right about everything

bored of this, was gonna quote adorno to keep trolling you but bleh it's just back and forth single "no u" messages at this point so whatever

about half of what i said is true idk maybe less but seriously bitch you need to chill and stop getting mad at random hatred of women on the internet, you taking it so seriously is blood in the water and precisely what entices people like me to ham up their own hatred of women to ULTRAMAX just to troll you

meta-ironically, that's actually what made me give up

i thought i could force her to chill by being exaggeratedly woman hateric so she'd have to realise her "EVERYONE'S A VIRGIN!!! VIRGINS! BAN THE VIRGINS!" tic was ineffectual

but they both just doubled down and committed themselves to repeating it until time itself ends

Since so much of modern feminism is eclectic pomo garbage and/or reactionary–I'd say no. But I'd say it does bring people who dabble in all kinds of eclecticism that has a reactionary bend. Same thing occurs when people criticize post-colonial/"critical race theory" from the Left. Also, I read your thread on 4/pol/ that was funny as shit m8

Enjoy your ivory tower then, and be vigilant as only a true leftist can be. Maybe when you deign again to teach us poor, idiot people there will be a statue contoured honorarily in the manner of your likeness.

'Brocialism' is typically just a reactionary slur against people that reject identity essentialism.

okay one of the things i was serious about is: please stop typing like you're a fucking arcane sorcerer from the land beyond the silverymoon mountains

i know you think that you're being fancy in badly crippling these words, but to people with reasonably high verbal intelligence you make yourself look like a tryhard and everyone just shifts around uncomfortably

I am legitimately autistic if you couldn't already tell.

literally so am i but you can learn to channel it so that you still sound human

it's fun to go "i know a fancy word that fits this situation! ;)" but it's no fun to go "EVERY SINGLE WORD MUST BE FANCIFIED."

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That explains the monologues.

You are exaggerating.

...

What don't you understand about that? The piece will be molded for the sake of honor.

I just find it interesting to watch the reactions people have when somebody broadly criticises femininity versus when they do the same for masculinity.

In most leftist spaces you can barely go two or three conversations without tripping over somebody talking about toxic masculinity or making sweeping criticisms of stereotypical male behaviour, why that makes men ill-suited for this or that and how to fix them.

Yet the moment a broad criticism of femininity is made - at least one that isn't really compliment like "they care too much" or "they are too emotionally sensitive to others needs" - the knives come out and the screeching begins.

It's bizarre.

it's not about understanding it, it's about the fact that the way you're saying it makes it sound like the next thing you're going to say is
as you pull out a rapier

W h o a

Youre a fucking faggot

I want /r9k/ to leave. Im sorry youre so lonely and resentful but stop basing your politics off of it

One should not "pull out" of a rapier lest they want to waste bio-matter.

i agree completely tbh

ironically she (?) mentioned wollstonecraft, and my reply to that was genuine. wollstonecraft really does have an insightful argument that women's entire persona is basically polluted by men kissing their asses. men put them on thrones, and women go "hey, comfy throne" and act like little tyrants.

beauvoir says basically the same thing. she says that femininity is "halfway between masculinity and eunuch," and that women are basically children who are prevented from reaching full maturity like men.

feminism took a weird turn in the 60s/70s when it become bourgeois. it became about comforting women who are already pretty comfortable, and it became a neo-chivalric ritual for men to show off how progressive they are.

when you see a woman go batshit that she (or women at large) are being criticised, you're basically seeing one of the biggest tragedies in human history enacting itself in immanent form on an everyday level. feminism as it was originally conceived (look how early wollstonecraft was in the movement!) was supposed to erode PRECISELY this kind of "princess syndrome," and to show that women could be just as hardcore as men.

instead, it was subverted as a bauble for bourgeois princesses to amuse themselves with. sad.

i'm actually a lesbian

There is no such thing.

weird, i wasn't class conscious until i got out of school and started working

where's your god now?

this could be said about any philosophy. philosophers usually aren't workers or peasants, their philosophy becomes a career in itself and with it comes the subcultural sense of separateness and it's mores

No wonder that the single-mother is so dependent, on some dole to raise her offspring, then that they can come together as "family," are abandoned and so must cling.

...

jesus fucking christ this sentence

Thanks.

...

...

So sad.

Listen, it was entertaining, first. Hell, it was actually funny.

But now I'm getting the feeling that you actually think that you're on my level. From the day I was born, I was destined for success, you little shit. I was brought into this world by a software engineer and and a prominent actuary, both of Norwegian descent. From the moment that the fucking curtains were raised, I was set to dominate the STEM fields. And because I had guardians that actually cared about me, I flourished. Pretty soon, I was placed into a special school of correspondence, specifically I.M Gelfand's school for gifted children in New England. I not only reached my parents' expectations, but I passed them with flying colors. I had raw talent. I was fucking better. I was surrounded by 6th graders, many from Hong Kong, whom were smarter than half the posters in this fucking thread. And now, where am I?

In MIT, getting my double BS in Electrical Engineering and Physics, with a Stanford-Binet tested Autism Level of 147 at age 17.

Get this through your head: you are nothing. I am worth more than your entire goddamn family. I'm smarter than you, better looking than you, taller than you, wealthier than you, and more employable than you. While you type out another post to get cheap laughs, I'll be simultaneously working with the brightest minds in the world and fornicating with my beautiful girlfriend. It gets on my nerves when people pretend to be better than me.

Know your place, you fucking vermin. Never, ever reply to my posts, again.

GODDAMNIT WHERE WERE YOU TWENTY MINUTES AGO

I was anally penetrating my girlfriend while constructing a recursive deep learning AI out of NAND gates for Google.

...

...

...

Kill yourself

RAND WAS A COMMIE :v)

Do they teach shitposting in the ebul liberal feminazi cultural marxist colleges?