(Anarchist) Communism can't work with nuclear and extended families because they inevitably become groups with a...

(Anarchist) Communism can't work with nuclear and extended families because they inevitably become groups with a mentality that is at the core of nationalism — nationalists see their nation as one big family, even.

Children must be raised communally by non-conscript volunteers and robots.

Proofs.. ?

wow plato was an ancom really makes you think

"family" is a nonsensical concept even now. Except for my friends with middle class parents, all my working class friends have formed ad hoc relationships to fulfill their needs.

Personally I haven't said a word to any of my extended family in years and I never really intend to. They're all normalfags or Bible thumpers and I want nothing to do with them.

People seem to forget about that part of the Republic where he advocates the communal crèche and anonymity of parents.

A shame he never foresaw multiracial communities even when during his own time Greeks were colonising Middle-Eastern, Western European and North-African trade ports.

They're only… vaguely similar. And that in content, rather than provenance.

By that logic, you'd want to prevent 2X-year-olds from ever meeting each other, too, because people of that age tend to form family-like bonds between their friends and partners.

And then, of course, we would never be able to appreciate this wonderwork of fin-de-millénaire television.

Are you going to argue that humans have walked on legs, but because all hitherto humans were not communists, you should walk on hands?

Nuclear family is the most successful unit ever designed. It didn't take 10000 years to create a unit where "people" like you will discuss other people as ageist and be pedophiles because children consents as well.

You are a reason why Leftists everywhere are seen as embarrassments. You are a retard. Take your progressivism elsewhere.

Eh, I'd be suspicious of statements like that. A lot of very long-lived cultures had significantly different family structures than the "nuclear family" model of the postwar West. The Russian family model, for example, still heavily emphasizes the role of grandparents in bringing up children; Iroquois, Haida and many others built longhouses to contain three or four families at a time; Trobriand fathers barely participate in their children's lives at all, and so on.

Presentism kills, really.

Citation fucking needed. It literally only lasted 50 years. 100 if you're generous.

This is wrong tough. It's only one model which was more adapted to XIX XXth centuries conditions. In the middle age and before, the dominant model was the extended family.
Now the nuclear model is slowly losing gound because one salary is not enough to sustain a home.

The nuclear family is dying as it lived: due to material forces.

Get thee hence and despook thyself

thx 10/10

Fuck. Off.

I've always advocated for the dissolution of the family unit, it's part and parcel of market ideology that strengthens competition and protectionism rather than cooperation and mutual aid.

The entire first page has become a shit show in the last few hours, eurofags need to get their shit together.

There's nothing wrong with strong families and communities. Instead, it'' a prerequisite for socialism.

t. Pol Pot

It's almost as though you're against the idea of forcing families to have at least 6 children

Lol
Seriously though I'd love to hear what these guys would replace the modern conception of family with. I can understand the disdain for one-man one-woman purism but a child needs parental figures and stability.

t. Literally 16 years old

...

every time you accuse me of being an attention whore or use ageism against me not even as an ad hominem but just as an insult irrelevant to the thread i get to talk about myself more so thanks criollito and company

t. tumbler autist

If you're going to discount my opinion because of my age that's age-based discrimination which is ageism. I don't care if I resemble your boogeyman when I point it out, that's called an association fallacy.

...

that wasn't my point at all, i never called myself an attention whore, i was just saying that if i were all this attention would make me pretty happy because the only attention i get from people who aren't just trying to make conversation is from you retards. And sure I'm 16, but that apparently is irrelevant if everyone's acting like they're in middle school anyway.
you can't just throw words like "asshurt" around willy nilly

...

Feels bad man.

see>>1145496
and fuck off

LOL this is a SFW board, tough luck pally. You are fucking stupid.

wew lad
people are just calling you a retard
there's no arguing there

Not an argument

>yet still being an asshurt teenage attention whore

Usually when you call someone a name you back it up somehow.

I pity you I honestly do

...

...

...

...

Nice one, porky. You are not getting my kids.

...

...

Cannot a family be organized horizontally?