Genocide

No, but I can equate your head with the pavement.

Glad you at least understand board supremacy Holla Forumsyp. Get fuckt you nazi bastid.

limited resources divided between two different evolutionary groups.
I do not understand the question
survival, security, and prosperity.
I'm confused at what you're trying to say here. What do you mean by
are you not the greatest lacking of race"?

We don't. That's why we should engage in racial supremacism and remove them.
No. The world we live in right now is the result of subversive elements within our societies weakening us to the point where self-defense is impossible. If white nations were strong - and we have every means to be this way - then this "backlash" would not even exist.
Colonial exploitation has been occurring for thousands of years.
They were always our enemies in that our interests were never aligned due to fundamental racial and cultural differences.
Not necessarily.
How incredibly naive you are. If you think the non-whites in our countries are "on our team" just because we showed them respect, then you're hopelessly blind to reality. Showing respect to your evolutionary competitors/enemies is a sign of weakness and an opportunity for them to exploit you back. There isn't a single example of multiple races getting along as one team.

Very intelligent and thoughtful reply.

I'm searching for an argument but I just can't find it.

morality is derived from evolution. An evolutionary beneficial act on the part of your own people is inherently moral, while one that harms then is inherently immoral. Extending your moral compass to those outside of your in-group is self-defeating.

No point arguing with the insufferable.

I have no objective arguments.
I have moral arguments but morality isn't objective.

I suppose to the intellectually corrupt, disagreement is insufferable

But they have higher Autism Level's than us, why would you kill off the master races?

The British Empire collapsed, like the Roman Empire collapsed, because it was over stretched and Indians didn't want to be British just likes Brits didn't want to be Roman. These days, nobody wants to be a fucking ignorant burgerfat autist.

Look at how your colonial domination is going in the middle east, you created the Taliban, then ISIS, spent billions of dollars containing them and now Russia has a stronger hold on Syria than the US. Nice work bro.

Hows Africa looking? Oh, its an unproductive hell hole instead of a beneficial ally.

Nice one colonialism, thanks. Now, when China final says FUCK A ROO RANKY SCUM The rest of the third world will be on their side.

right and? That doesn't change that it has landed us in a world full of shit and cancer. That is the colonial ideology.

>They were always our enemies in that our interests were never aligned due to fundamental racial and cultural differences.

No, due to both wanting a fertile stretch of land.

Tell me why Al Adil, Brother of Saladin, and Richard got on so very well if their cultures were so far apart?

Yes necessarily, if you are getting something from somebody for free, they are by necessity losing part of their labour value. That is the nature of exploitation or it isn't exploitation. This drives them into the ground.. and then later you have to clean up the mess that YOU MADE

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

*pause*

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

WHAT IS THE FA CUP?

WHAT IS THE SUPERBOWL?

WHAT IS THE YPG?

THERE ARE LITERALLY COUNTLESS EXAMPLES OF THIS

AHAHAHA. BRO GET YOURSELF SOME KROPOTKIN AHAHA MUTUAL AID: A FACTOR IN EVOLUTION

Why do black people join the US army voluntarily now? They were given respect, now they fight for the US.

Notice how they had to have freedom dangled in front of them before they would do this willingly.. funny that

THE MOST PRODUCTIVE EVER STAGE OF HUMAN HISTORY (THIS ONE) HAS BEEN THE ONE IN WHICH MANY COUNTRIES THREW OFF THEIR COLONIAL CHAINS. THE MOST MULTICULTURAL, irrelevant shitING, IDEA MIXING CENTURY EVER, HAS BEEN THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED AND PRODUCTIVE

racial supremacy is a spook, you have no relation to anyone but yourself, and races don't exist. All genocide will do is waste time, money, and energy chasing after a pointless fantasy and won't stop you from fucking yourself over with crapitalism

Oh…I see…

sage.

Because they aren't of our race and are thus a threat to us. Also, how the fuck does autism = "master race". I know you might be autistic, but don't pretend like it makes you super human.
The British Empire collapsed due to two costly and pointless wars in Europe, both of which being largely in the interests of the subversive group I outlined. Indians not wanting to be British had nothing to do with it.
The destruction in the middle east is for the benefit of large corporate and banking interests as well as Israel. Do not be fooled into thinking modern day "colonialism" is in any way beneficial to whites. I do not advocate what is happening in the middle east, nor do I support the corrupt, deeply triggering and problematic, self-destructive occupied regime that is tearing the West apart.
That's the result of Africans being shitty, low-intelligent, and violent. European colonialism was the best thing that ever happened to them.
Oh you silly, silly child. China is basically doing in Africa what Europeans did a century ago, except this time they don't have to do the whole "uplift out of the stone age" thing whites had to.
Yes, which is the result of fundamental racial and cultural differences clashing. If both groups were indistinguishable, there would be conflict between them over who got the land. They would literally be part of the same in-group.
Jesus fucking Christ, you're a retard. We're currently in a discussion about the fundamental composition of human societies and the underlying motivations of each race, and the best examples of interracial co-operation is a couple of fucking sports teams? Christ almighty, you leftist lack brain function.
It's a job
Topkek. If niggers cared about the US they wouldn't be rioting and burning down communities over false allegations of racial profiling by police. They wouldn't constantly attack white people at a disproportionate level. They wouldn't maintain victim and guilt complexes to maintain the flow of cash from taxpaying white Americans to their worthless ghettos. Your example is so fucking weak it's laughable. How exactly is a black person joining the US army evident of "respect" for my race? The US army is not in any way explicitly pro-white.

Racial supremacy is a biological reality. It does not care about your feelings.
My sides. Let me guess. Biology is a spook too, right? What about science? Evolution? Nah - that's just ebil racist stuff. Tell me, retard, if race doesn't exist, then explain why certain groups of humans have evolved resistance to certain diseases while others haven't? Explain why brain volume, skull shape, muscular-skeletal structures and gestation periods differ based on which group of humans you observe? Explain why Autism Level and hormone levels are racially-specific? Explain why multiracial people require blood transplants from people of the same mix as them? Explain how we can literally identify the race of an individual by looking at their skeleton or testing their genetic material? Maybe you should do your research before embarrassing yourself so profoundly.
but user, class is a spook. As is capitalism.
It doesn't. I would happily go into more detail about this if you want, but it seems you're more interested in being a retard.

your race is missing key components of human biodiversity that would render it supreme and most of its greatness is loaned from asians and mediterraneans
extremely difficult to maintain especially while warring with other empires
they will fight you tooth and nail. using nukes will render useless le lebensraum

such as?
Lol no.
Mediterraneans are white.
I don't think niggers are as hard to kill as you seem to think they are.

spook

Can you give one argument for racial supremacism, colonial exploitation, or genocide that isn't based on morality or ideology?
Protip: you can't.

Well, believe it or not, not all whites are sociopaths like you. Gennocide violates International law, you see, so you will have a situation where people at home and abroad will be up in your shit if you try it. So even if I theoretically did hate people of other races and think they were inferior, I'd have to go through members of my own race and several international militaries to kill them. It's just a stupid idea even if you are racist.

Burden of proof is on you

So if they were white they wouldn't be a threat to us…. only plenty of white people kill other white people all the time. Like ALL the time.

I mean what are you saying the British colonisation of Ireland was justified? Those were white people. Or is colonisation only justifiable white on black?

autism rates is word filter for I….Q…..

The British Empire was collapsing long before this. The loss of America for one happened long before.

Even whites don't like to be colonised isn't that funny.

>both of which being largely in the interests of the subversive group I outlined

The second world war was in the interest of the Jews?

Go on then, tell me how this was so.

Just like the destruction of India was for the benefit of the various East India Trading companies…. and the destruction of Latin America for similar.

Israel is a western colonial outpost.

And yet you can somehow justify colonisation in other ways, apparently ways less 'corrupt' and 'self destructive'. This is my whole point, its ALWAYS corrupt and its ALWAYS self destructive.

No that's the result of European Colonialism.

Tribes, families, traditional structures torn apart, mass starvation and enslavemnet.

You are fucking retarded.

You know there were large black Christian Kingdoms right? There were large parts of Africa that were Christian before Europe.

Fucking heathen.

Ha, the why did Hitler go after 'Lebensraum' in White Europe against white people? Why did Britain enslave the Irish? Why did the French and English go to war for so long?

Jesus fucking Christ, you're a retard. We're currently in a discussion about the fundamental composition of human societies and the underlying motivations of each race, and the best examples of interracial co-operation is a couple of fucking sports teams? Christ almighty, you leftist lack brain function.

and BTW the YPG is a militia currently fighting ISIS.

Oh and also all of the most well off places on earth right now are multicultural.

Like, the US, that nation of immigrants. Didn't exactly work out badly for them did it, world super power and all.

and… its one they now do willingly instead of having being forced to do it. Wouldn't you rather have an army of niggers at your disposal than an army of niggers attacking you?

You would make a poor general.

Guess which 'niggers' these are: its not the ones with the job and the respect.

Well, what is an argument for it? It accomplishes literally nothing but to psychologically reinforce the rule of a despot.

You are making a fundamental mistake. These are not properties of race, but rather genetics. The classification into races is a human invention designed to making grouping people easier. However this grouping of race has no grounding in genetics and thins intrinsic to humans, rather it only has grouding in what people observe about humans.

Trying to say that there are some groups of definite races is like saying that there is an objective morality. You have to prove it first. But just like moral reletavism, there's a hint where you see that the definition of who fits into what races, the number of races etc. has changed continuously over time and even differs between people today in cluture. Sure, it's possible that you're right about it and other people are wrong - but you still need to prove that. And it's quite unlikely that you'd be right.

Race is merely a human invention to make grouping people easier. Perhaps there does exist some grouping more concrete, but what race has historically refered to and what it refers to now is not that thing.

This is rubbish. What qualifies as superior and inferior is ultimately decided by humans and the society they live in. This is again very similar to the fact that there is no accepted definition for you to say it is "biological reality". Aristotle thought the mark of a great man was physical strength (or something like that, it doesn't matter if he did or didn't). The point is that what you consider unimportant, the next person will consider important. Thus there is no "supremacy" unless you can prove that there is some objective baseline for that supremacy that transcends time.

You are free to have faith in that if you want, I have faith in things I can't prove. But you can't claim with no reference to why you think that way.

Read Marx.

To add, the main irony of the argument for race isn't that there isn't enough genetic diversity in humans, but that there is too much. Drawing meaningful biological lines in a way that applies to politics is virtually impossible without getting into so much detail as to be useless.

One could point to seemingly identical subspecies of non-human animals being identified, but this is also hugely controversial in academic circles–people jump at the chance to name something and be remembered for it.

pls email [email protected]/* */ if you're a cat named sakamoto and want a cute furret to lick your paws
Welcome to India, friend!

pls email [email protected]/* */ if you're a cat named sakamoto and want a cute furret to lick your paws
Yes, untanned, pubeless.

pls email [email protected]/* */ if you're a cat named sakamoto and want a cute furret to lick your paws
Why would I ever post my picture here? I'm not looking to get rated by a bunch of user.

From what people say, I'm decently attractive. I just think being short would make me more attractive to men and allow me to date a wider range of guys (most 5'7", 5'8" guys aren't interested or start acting weird about heels). I've been on a date with a guy where he's asked if I want to change shoes because he was insecure about my heels.

tfw thinking of doing this

What is your in-group exactly?

Anglos? Scandinavians? Aryans? Mediterraneans? Slavic? Where is the cut-off point and can you give me a logical reason why that specific cut off point is best? I.e. how it would improve the material conditions of that in group as a whole.

In any case, I believe that people are more connected by class and culture rather than ethnicity. Of course culture can be linked to ethnicity, however, it is by no means a certainty and people of different ethnicities can and do assimilate into cultures other than their 'historical" one.

As such, racial supremacy and genocide are on the whole inefficient ways at improving the material conditions of a populace within which people of the same in group can have widely varying circumstances more closely related to the economic system rather than ethnicity.

Any Medabots porn?

I like the Machiavellian approach to politics for these scenarios and, indeed, most military operations.
If you're going to do it, then you need to do it hard. Slaughter everyone, let the blood fill the streets, and leave nothing behind. Not a single survivor. Otherwise don't bother. Half-measures only invite reprisal. If you strike, you must strike in a manner that leaves your enemy unable to stand or else you will be destined for failure.

It may not be the most direct answer, but it's what you're getting from me.

I'm the same age as you, and my mom had reconstructive surgery several times throughout her life. She was in a major accident when she was 19, almost died and it fucked up her face a bit. She went in for another rhinoplasty later on, I was 4. I remember her crying when we dropped her off at the hospital because I thought she was sick/hurt. Other than that, it hasn't had any effect on me growing up.

It's your body and you have every right to do what you wish with it, and I think your daughter will be just fine.

...

Rolled 2 (1d7)

for bag

Goodness me, which ride should I queue for first?

Jews, Greeks and Italians have swarthy complexions, curly hair and considered everyone north of the mediterranean to be savages (which they are, nothing has convinced me snow niggers aren't subhumans)

Between Roman Law, Judaic Morality, Greek Philosophy and Politics snow niggers have exactly zero contributions to civilization worth mentioning outside of dystopian autistic engineering feats which are retrospectively terrible and destroying the planet at an irreversible pace

Yeah 2 billion Asians and 1.5 billion Dindus aren't going to mass organize and use every single weapon and able body available to commit acts of mass terrorism and total war against muh snow nigger populations

Asians won't use bio weapons. Blacks won't bomb every major city on the Southern Coast of Europe. Dindus in America totally won't initiate Nazi masturbation fantasy. Arabs totally won't come to the aid of Dindus and Asians. Russia will be totally chill with all the mongoloid massacres.

user is autistic on a level only a snow nigger can be. You have to have had literally zero contributions to civilization as a race to be this dumb and insolent

Better not be mediterraneans. Mussolini and even Hitler recognized that Aryans (Snow Niggers) were sub human compared to Meditteranids and were living in mud huts divining through animal guts until Romans brutally suppressed them and taught them how not to be savages. Greeks are the reason Euros use silverware and not their hands to eat their garbage, disgusting, unaesthetic culinary abominations.

Original people's of Iberia, Gaul and Albion were not related to Snow Niggers they are related to Meditteranids, N Africans and Semites, but not Snow Niggers. Snow Niggers closest ancestors are mud hut peoples and barbarians from Southeastern Europe and the Steppes of Eurasia. Absolutely no culture prior to contact with more advanced races. Dindus were more advanced than them in many ways

Scandis all have autism and are cucked beyond belief in more ways than one

Anglos hate Central Euros and would never readily ally with autists or turn on Jews whom they have respect for.

White Supremacy is the funniest fairy tale fantasy i've ever come across. The idea that THEY WUZ EVERYTHANG is not even the third funniest aspect of it. Between their total lack of aesthetic sense, their autism, their hatred of liesure and high society, their total disrespect towards Arabs and Jews, their indolent petulance towards superior Asiatic philosophy and their weak, fragile bodies in comparison to Dindus they are a pathetic candidate for master race. If any race is the master race its probably the Han Chinese, the Jews or the Anglos (and only the Anglos, no other snow niggers qualify)

meme

Yes actually, I can. Racial supremacism, colonial exploitation and genocide are all favourable from an evolutionary perspective as they eliminate competitor populations and secure more resources for my own people's use. This has clear and objective evolutionary benefits.

International law is a spook. In reality international order is determined by whichever country has the biggest guns.

False equivalency. One group of whites might not be the best of friends to another group of whites, but in the end both still belong to the same race and thus have no long-term interest in exterminating themselves. Non-whites, on the other hand, have every evolutionary interest in seeing all of us disappear.
The loss of America happened in the lat 1700's, which was before the British Empire reached its pinnacle of global power. It was the two world wars that ensured the Empire would ultimately collapse.
Yes actually. You see, Jews at that time were (and still currently are) heavily involved in the financial and banking sectors. They disproportionately made up the "piggy" class that controlled (still do) this system of debt-based international finance designed to enslave the world. What Hitler did was free post-WWI Germany from overwhelming Jewish dominance by primarily banning the usurious debt-based monetary system (usury being the means by which Jews have controlled European banks and money for centuries), as well as banning Jewish involvement in media and entertainment, which they were using to spread morally bankrupt and socially damaging lifestyles like sexual promiscuity. Hitler posed a direct threat to their global scheme of international financial control, so they wanted the United Kingdom, which had been under the thumb of the Rothschilds for centuries, to go to war with Germany and put a stop to their "prob.lematic" behaviour. Germany offered multiple peace offers at the start of the war that were not outrageous by any means (allowed Poland to keep much of its territory), but were refused.
What are you talking about? The Brits didn't "destroy" India. They unified it under a single uncoruptable and highly effective rule, under which roads, schools, hospitals, train-tracks and industry were built. I would watch the following vid before spouting your "muh colonialism = bad" nonsense like a fool. youtube.com/watch?v=HGERS905pPk
Please tell me how destroying a location you want to do business is beneficial to that business? Please tell me how building up industry and modernity from the ground up in your subject countries constitutes destruction?
You're a fucking retard. Israel is a Jewish ethnostate that effectively controls American foreign policy through its influence over American politics using organisations such as AIPAC. The only country America's wars in the Middle East benefit is Israel. Tell me. How is a country that has threatened to nuke Europe if its existence is threatened a "Western colonial outpost"?
But it's not always corrupt and not always self destructive. Colonialism designed to be explicitly beneficial to my race is perfectly fine as far as I'm concerned.
No. It's the result of Africans being stupid, low-iq and violent. All those roads, hospitals, schools, vaccines sure did turn those peace-loving Africans into a nasty lot, didn't they? I'm sure had Europe left them alone they would be on the moon by now, right? If everything is "muh colonialism" then explain South Africa and Zimbabwe. Both were incredibly successful countries and were considered "breadbaskets" of Africa. After the blacks took control, took the land from whitey, and kicked them out, both of them devolved into violent third-world shitholes that require foreign aid to survive. Niggers are violent and shit no matter where they go and this has nothing to do with the ebil colonialism whitey brought 'em.

So basically what they were doing to each other for centuries prior to Europeans ever showing up.
Lol. Europeans brought means of producing far more food far more effectively than the native populations in their hunter-gatherer societies ever succeeded in doing. There's a reason Africa has a population explosion today - ebil whitey brought them the medicine and food capable of sustaining it.
Europeans didn't "bring" enslavement to them. They were enslaving each other long before whites showed up. In fact, it was niggers who sold their enemies to Europeans as slaves. Slavery STILL takes place in Africa today. Where would they be without whites? Probably still living in straw huts and squatting in their own shit. Oh wait. Many of them still do that :^)
Ethiopia being the only one. You do know that being Christian has nothing to do with being advanced, right?

I am glad neoliberalism is a thing because it triggers autists like you so much

might is right , so enjoy your refgees

Unless you make insane money you should just drive a 3k civic. A car is a tool and money sink.

races are genetic classifications, dumbass.
No, it is to identify very distinguishable subspecies of humanity.
This is patently false. Genetics are literally the foundation for racial classification. Different races have different activated alleles in their genome which result in different characteristics. Combinations of these traits end up clustering together, resulting in the various distinct racial groups of humanity.
No. This is a completely false equivalency. One is founded in genetics and the material world, and the other is conceptual.
It's already been done many times. Your rejection of this proof has no bearing on its legitimacy.
Just like species, right? Species, after all, just belong to a long continuum of living things, do n't they? Do species now no longer exist?
No. What superior and inferior qualities are what ultimately result in higher chance of survival. Racial supremacism has nothing to do with some universal standard of "superiority", although that is an argument we could have later.
Marx is an idiot and I can outright refute his entire concept of "surplus value" right here if you want me to, but that's not really what this argument is about.

Do it then, faggot

You mean a spirituality that discourages individualism and creativity?
Is that why Europeans dominate almost exclusively in all strongman competitions?
That's a funny way of saying "built the foundations of the modern civilisation we all take for granted, as well as basically all the technology we enjoy that makes our daily lives so easy"
Whites invented essentially all modern technology. Whites produced the greatest artists and musicians. Whites produced the greatest philosophers. Whites conquered the world with said technology.

Asians made some explodey powder centuries before while trying to create an immortality potion and never really used for anything of great importance. Whites took it and perfected it as a weapon of war, later using it to conquer the very people who invented it in the first place.

And now whites are getting conquered by jews using the technology and economic systems developed by whites themselves

How does this make you feel?

please read about race

race, even when referring to animals (i.e not the human sense), is below the subspecies level - you are refuting yourself

No, race in the human sense was developed as a concept way before people could identify human genes and their causes, read about the history of racial classification
it may be true that you can point to a gene and say that this identifies black people, but if you look around that, you will see it does not *only* identify blacks, because "blacks" as a concept is a human made concept and you're trying to match it up

Can you list and describe these groups? What about those with mixtures of traits?

the conecpt of race is conceptual

peer reviewed papers published in major credible scientific journals and scientific concensus needed

Wikipedia says "A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which two individuals can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction."

The fact that it is "often defined" that way means that species is a human-made conecpt. It can be indicative of something with more meaning, but you can't claim that without evidence. Even if it wasn't "often defined", it's just as arbitrary as saying that a flimflam is any animal that has more than 10000 hairs before age 2 months. It literally has no meaning other than what we ascribe to it.

According to whom, you? According to me, superior quality is the person who is least racist. You loose.

If you are saying it exists outside of your mind as something measurable and objective, then you are saying it is a universal standard, at least for life on earth, that transcends time

no he wasn't

hahaha
You realise that these are all subjective, right? I think the Buddha was the greatest philosopher, Yoshitoshi was the greatest artist, and that Ali Farka Touré was the greatest musician. Don't give me this "greatest" rubbish. Besides, nobody creates in a vacuum, there are sources from everywhere that are merged to create art.

go beat your breast and make caveman sounds somewhere else

just

You mean like the teaching of Atman and Tibetan Buddhism and Tantra (the most based of all Eastern Traditions) and also Zen (absolute freedom) lol uneducated snow nigger

Yes and when it comes to sports where motions you find in combat (aka explosive movement) are found who dominates? That's right dindus are faster sprinters, better boxers, better wrestlers, better tacklers, higher jumpers, better endurance runners (whites dominate olympic wrestling because blacks don't have money for wrestling rings and they're already getting better at all white dominated sports only a matter of time before they BTFO snow niggers for good)

What did snow niggers build? Romans and Greeks and Jews built basically everything (Byzantium, Christianity, Roads, Philosophy, Ethics, Arches, Aqueducts, Sewers, Legal system, banking, secular ideology, Renaissance) you think your faggot autist motors and trains are something we should care about? Trigga please we could rebuilt that shit overnight. Atomic energy is all Jewish (and Anglo).
Greatest artists are Greco-Romans, Italians, Byzantine Greeks/Turks, Moorish Spaniards, Arabs and Persians along with East Asians. You think autistic landscapes and portraits are great art? Please you fucking autist. Snow niggers are not southern europeans or N Africans or Middle Easterners you had nothing to do with most mathematics or great art prior to the end of the Renaissance

Whites never conquered any part of Asia ever. Asians are intelligent, linguistically advanced, organized race of people. The British and Dutch never dominated mainland China or Japan like they did Americas and Caribbean. Stop with your fap fantasies. Composite Bow, Cross Bow, Cannons, Ink based parchment writing, calligraphy, Buddhism (which is where neo-platonism and stoicism come from) and Bureaucracy are all Asiatic contributions (not even counting Arabs and Jews and Afghans/Pakis/North Indians; if i did you have nothing)

the absolute funniest part of the snownigger stormfaggot ethos is the idea that a subhuman race of "uncreative, weaklings" not only invented their religious and moral framework but also somehow subverted and mentally cucked the proud aryan peoples

The entire idea of "surplus value" is retarded for multiple reasons, but the most glaring one being the fact that value is entirely subjective. There is no such thing as "objective value", so it's for this reason that the idea that someone can have excess valued "skimmed off" is nonsensical. Labour is not magical. Like most things, it is merely a commodity that can be bought and sold. Similarly, just like any commodity, the value of labour is entirely contextual and determined by whatever market forces are acting on it. The value of labour cannot exist separate from the system by which value itself is determined. When an employer hires a person (purchases their labour) for a particular price (wage), they are not paying the labourer "less" than the "real value" of his labour. The employer is paying the labourer exactly what is labour is worth in the context of the market within which they operate. If an employer were required by law to pay their workers more, they would go out of businesses because they are being forced to pay a wage to the labourer larger than what that labourer actually produces for the company. A labourer is always payed exactly what his labour is worth in the context of a market, because it is ultimately the market itself that determines value in the first place.

How do you think it makes me feel? My people are dying and my civilization is being destroyed. At least you understand full well why I want to exterminate the fuckers. Either you're a gloating shitskin, which is funny considering you enjoy the fruits of the white race while mocking our demise, or you're a self-loathing white, in which case you're pathetic cuckold who wishes to doom his own people to extinction. Which is it?

The LTV is not the same as the surplus value theory, and Marx recognizes value is subjective, he calls this aspect of the commodity exchange value

You clearly have no fucking clue

Good to hear, after all, might is rightisn't it faggot

white boys simply can't compete

No it isn't, you said two people of the same race have no reason to fight, its total bullshit, as I have shown with examples. Your basic premise is false.

So it was collapsing before it even peaked? The British Empire, like all others, failed to hold on to power because a large centralised structure like that is inefficient and must always break off into more localised parts. An empire would be fine if it was totally decentralised, but then it wouldn't be an empire.

Which he replaced with his own ponsi scheme
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefo_bills

Usury is at its base a private property relation. Interest on debt implies absentee ownership.

If you want to know about debt read this book Debt: The First 5000 years, By Davis Graeber. It will also show you just how fruitful colonialism has been in terms of debt and the native people of whichever country.

You do realize a great deal of imperialism, colonialism, was carried out through debt peonage, indeed it still is to this day, so you are saying that you are in fact in favour of debt slavery, which was part and parcel of most any colonial enterprise.

Yeh we'll just stop there. If you truly believe the government of India has at any stage in history been 'uncorruptable', or any government structure ever, for that matter, you are fucking deluded.

michaelparenti.org/Imperialism101.html

"What is called "underdevelopment" is a set of social relations that has been forcefully imposed on countries. With the advent of the Western colonizers, the peoples of the Third World were actually set back in their development sometimes for centuries. British imperialism in India provides an instructive example. In 1810, India was exporting more textiles to England than England was exporting to India. By 1830, the trade flow was reversed. The British had put up prohibitive tariff barriers to shut out Indian finished goods and were dumping their commodities in India, a practice backed by British gunboats and military force. Within a matter of years, the great textile centers of Dacca and Madras were turned into ghost towns. The Indians were sent back to the land to raise the cotton used in British textile factories. In effect, India was reduced to being a cow milked by British financiers.
By 1850, India's debt had grown to 53 million pounds. From 1850 to 1900, its per capita income dropped by almost two-thirds. The value of the raw materials and commodities the Indians were obliged to send to Britain during most of the nineteenth century amounted yearly to more than the total income of the sixty million Indian agricultural and industrial workers. The massive poverty we associate with India was not that country's original historical condition. British imperialism did two things: first, it ended India's development, then it forcibly underdeveloped that country.

Similar bleeding processes occurred throughout the Third World. The enormous wealth extracted should remind us that there originally were few really poor nations. Countries like Brazil, Indonesia, Chile, Bolivia, Zaire, Mexico, Malaysia, and the Philippines were and sometimes still are rich in resources. Some lands have been so thoroughly plundered as to be desolate in all respects. However, most of the Third World is not "underdeveloped" but overexploited. Western colonization and investments have created a lower rather than a higher living standard."

They're pairing him with every 10in+ power-top/daddy while they can. I'm wondering how long he'll have before something important falls out but I'm also jealous

Btw, shorty here (5'6ish). Never found someone over 6' but I want to. Guys think I look too fragile

Exchabge value is subjective, you are a retard that have never read marx

The jewsmare able to impose theirmight on the white race, so that makes them right

Either accept this or find a less retarded way of looking at life

isn't this japanese?

How about these:

Rock, Paper, Scissors

Economy, Industry, Politics

air pollution, land pollution, water pollution

good, evil, neutral

Yeh, it's a component of the exposition.
But "random doesn't make sense.

You'll need much depth of field for landscape photography, so close the aperture and shoot. No need to fiddle around with it. Just know what you're doing

I am observing reality, the jews have the force to impose their might on the white race, which makes them right, they have the bigger gun, they control everything
Also
Lol dumb retard, i never made a moral claim

I am very happy this triggers you and hurts your feelings tho

Maybe don't smash your laptop with an axe next time

Thats the same with your taxi stands in new york. And your metro. And your ferry stations.

Hell i have been to afganistan and the only time i have ever felt like i needed a gun, outside of removing kebabs, was in jamaica NY. The bronx was literally comfy.

...

I honestly believe this

the man is a fat waste. what else does he have to do since murdering his wife?

Because it's rooted in spooks

hello op. fellow northern californian here. A word of advice to you.

get a job.

I work 40 hrs a week making 2g a month paying 500/mo rent. 25% of income going to rent is really not that bad. Not even sure if I'll stay in my current place which is fine because lease is up in 6 months anyhow. I'll have a better deal worked out by then as I am already in the process of searching. As one should always be. Always searching for new higher paying jobs too. That doesn't keep me from showing up to work every morning. Come on bro. Go outside. Live your life.
t. 21 year old

...

what do you mean?

How do you determine who belong to which race and which races are superior to others? Nazi pseudo-science?

Morlocks, bitch! Darwinism thrives in adversity, not comfort. Freeloading a.k.a. Colonialism a.k.a. stealing makes you weak and lazy.

...

Not even half as kind as Mormons desu senpai

The map is just showing whites and non-whites. Who would be autistic enough to draw all those people with their real colours?

Just get a job and buy a ranch. Killing muslims should already be prerogative for non-muslims.

John "satan is my boss" Podesta

There isn't one, but there isn't one to join or care for any bigger or smaller group like "family", "neighborhood", "region", "nation" "race" or "humanity" either.
I'll fuck every one of those groups when it's for my benefit and you won't because of your spooks, that's why I'll win.

lol its even got the mexican flag on it

lel

Nobody is equal but it can be technologically overcome:

-Eugenics (genetic engineering, breeding, etc)

-Virtual reality(you can virtually have and experience anything)

-Artificial Intelligence: very advanced artificial intelligence could keep track and manage an ethically sustainable society that maximizes happyness for everyone

- Space colonies: Space colonies will most probably be communist, will provide valuable information on how to apply to larger society number.

- Overpopulation control: the more numerous the society the more hard is to control the global community, reducing people by pacific means would be good. Alternative is terraform other worlds too.

...

sage

not for long they will. the ovens await again

bump

why the fuck would anyone want that?
Holla Forums takes naturalist falacies to entirely new levels.
why the fuck not? The Black Death killed pretty much only whites and benefited those same whites. I'd love a ZombieLand scenario where I get to take my dead countrymen's shit.

Not allowing an entire people to die of starvation

Most blacks in America are whiter than the Irish

This test is obviously made to gather data for some liberal disphit who would rant about how conservative white fucking males don't have empathy.

Actually Holla Forums doesn't approve of outsourcing jobs and wants factory jobs like this in the U.S. Liberals want this and are ok with it whether it be their kids Transformer toy or their iphone 8.

What are you asking?

Are you asking for an objective argument as to why you should not? Because objectivity doesn't work that way.

actually what you mean is Tai Chi is a form of Qi Gong, if you ever take Kung Fu/Wu Shu classes and it isn't mentioned then leave you aren't doing kung fu.

1 post by this ID

Bamp for justice

...

Why would you want to have more than 0?

...

I don't give two shits so long as he doesn't start the WW3.

really sparks those synapses

It's all paperwork and logistics. The higher up you get in rank, the more that your plan to "kill everyone you meet" becomes your plan to reduce overhead and organize personnel.

Source: Officer

I'm not going to say it's a woman's job, but it's not a job that is particularly manly

Because handegg is a shit sport for shit people like ameritards

Paypay

easy, race is a spook.
the average Asian or Black isn't anymore of a threat to you then your fellow white (except if he's a racial supremecist shitheads like yourself, which are more common among white anyway).

but lets assume that race exist and that there are vast differences between one race and another, so what ?

its like a bunch of going after another breed of horse because…well… they don't look like them.

So was Atheism and Christianity hahaha

They seem to only exist in the pacific northwest in America.

The Sassenach know!

Hopefully. Lying piece of shit

OLIMME

Oh look, all the upper echelon of USA politicians had had kiddie porn planted on their computors!1!1 They didn't donwload it themselves, oh no sirree. They were planted by the vewy, vewy evil Russian spies.

Fucking this

1) rename it to "Islamism"
2) make "Islamism" defined as a political ideology like nazism
3) use existing anti-nazism laws to suppress it
if people complain, compare them to nazis

muslims can keep their cucked postmodern Islam just like christians have their cucked postmodern christianity

youtube.com/watch?v=Xnw8JRpXdAc

Why can't they ever find anyone who is actually funny to roast Trump?

We will, when the throne of England will fall finally into the hands of Abu Ismail II Hadrillah

Yup.
PROTECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY AGAINST TERRORIST AND RELATED ACTIVITIES ACT 33 OF 2004
. 6 year sentence. Got off in three,

Go fuck yourself auzie cunt you have nothing to complain about

That doesn't address my point, and the fact (which they themselves have admitted), that Iran has funded, armed and trained the Taliban and Al-Qaeda - for their own benefits and their own needs in the region, at some point. Now please move the goal posts again to dodge this point. You're the shill, not us, for acting like a rat when this is brought up, and claiming that anyone who points out this fact is a neo-con or Israel shill. If you just did you research (takes 5 minutes) before posting, you wouldn't be making an ass of yourself.

/thread

Weak bait.

In Denmark you wouldn't. Prenatal DNA testing has removed downs near entirely.