Of all the identifiable people or posters on this sad site who would Holla Forums say is the worst??

What? You don't like his quality posting?

second post best post

there is not a single thread you don't attempt to derail

that post is kinda funny, but why is he unpopular round these parts?

How fucking old is this nigga?

...

Like, he seems to know his shit a lot of the time, but he's just so fucking uncharitable when reading other people's arguments which makes him a fucking pain in the ass to argue with. He's also presumptuous as fuck, with regards to beliefs he assumes the people he's discussing with hold.
I don't know if he's serious or just memeing, but he pulls a lot of the bullshit tankie moves, like unironically dismissing people as revisionist, believing every single person who died while Stalin was chief was a kulak &c.
Lastly I've seen him pull the ">author name, disregard" move once or twice, and then held others in contempt for doing the same thing to him.

Uhh, anfem statue poster, muke, cigarposter, prickly (is he banned now?), the really insufferable stalin stache poster who's not the trip, groucho marx poster, schnitz, fuckmuir, space, lares, gadsden, catgrill, technocracy guy, marxposter who knew economy, the killing fields guy who did all the pol pot oc, nix, that other nihilist who won't shut up about nietzsche, pirateflag, that ypg guy who has contacts in the lions, probably some others I'm forgetting. I'm not even an IRC/discord/bunkerchan faggot, and I could think of at least this many off the top of my head.
Half of those are probably inactive now though.

he sounds as if he's old, and not a native English speaker

Yui, Hyperion and the angels-egg poster

That cool user who posts Pepes

no, they are not baned, and everything you know about them is bunkerfag lies

I wouldn't say "everyone".

It's a very loud minority (maybe even one individual) that likes to feel self-important. They would jump at anyone who doesn't conform to their ideas of propriety and I'm quite obnoxious in this respect (anti-Green, anti-Wolff, pro-Soviet position is as far from Conformist Left as you can get), while tripcode provides for easy identification.

Thus I get personal and undivided attention. There has to be dozens of my posts archived at this point.

All too often their whole argumentation is based on some anti-Marxist nonsense I'm supposed to take for granted. Soviet State Capitalism, for example.

I never claimed that.

My first deviation from the norm is that Stalin wasn't even proper "chief". He might've been the most respected, but still one among the many politicians that shaped Soviet politics. Not an omnipotent dictator.

My second deviation would be justification of dekulakization - as a whole process - as necessary. It was unavoidable in some form, and this rural ostracism that Soviets managed to pull off was the least painful solution.

Third deviation would be support of Beria's purges (fourth wave, the one that begun in late 1938), since those were directed against the people who created the purges of 1937/38 in the first place, meanwhile Beria was freeing people that got wrongly accused.

Because Dunayevskaya is a liar through and through. With her it's a non-stop barrage of distortions, lies and absolutely insane bullshit.

On the other hand, I don't dismiss Trotsky - despite finding that he deliberately falsified Lenin's quote to support his position. He is not a complete waste of time.

...

it's like you want to have an NSA profile

Anfem, Rebel, A.W., no gf Nazi

Satannazi, and a variety of nazi posters who only stay for a few days at a time, sometimes they're pretty identifiable. Also that dude who falseflags to have discussions about Autism Level for the past couple of weeks. That guy who shills for some newssite while posting half-naked asians (does he have a name?).

I've seen some people (tankies and other MLs mostly) call the whole state capitalism thing a meme. I'll be honest and say that I don't actually know anybody who use the terminology except for leftcom.org (Who are not the IMT? The IMT are the trotsky newspaper people right?) and stupid reddit 'socialists' who just use it as the 'real socialism hasn't been tried' argument.
Why is it a joke? Or is it only a joke with regards to Stalin's USSR specifically? I'm not really that into the history of soviet Russia or any of it's various allies, but the way I get it MoP wasn't socialized in the manner that people usually mean it when they use the word socialism, is the problem in the way people use the word socialism or in people's understanding of the historical reality?

so, who is the worst?

The Lacan dick sucker who posts with the islamic communism flag and believes all trannies are bourgeois d.egenerates.

I disagree seriously. islamag communism poster is one of the better posters.

These 2 dickheads that get triggered whenever someone calls Islam reactionary.

The nazis probably, in the end.
If I have to chose a leftist it's probably either non-trip stalinstache guy who is a full on assad dick-sucker tankie or prickly, who's just a fucking autist that's annoying to have around, his fucking ML hate threads never went anywhere and were always just an excuse for him to ban people he didn't like.

Historically, Milo was definitely the worst. The old anfem was pretty awful as well. Checkers was too funny to be truly annoying.

Satanposter is one of the highest quality tripfags on this board. At least she's actually entertaining

Sure, but she's also dumb as fuck.

How can you tell the difference between them? Holla Forums is /r9k/ as fuck.

There's that one incel who won't shut up about it. He's admitted to being the same guy when asked a couple of times.

either Milo or the TFW no GF naziposter

She's still vastly more fun than Stalintripfag, Milo, or NogfNazi

NEET socdem.

He's the one that is obsessed with arranged marriage and uses leftist rhetoric to try and paint some weird picture of Chad being a bourgeois who deprives you of your cute Aryan wife and how it's the fault of human nature because women like brutish men and he is meek

There's also based Yugoposter. I specifically remember him because I used to post under a Yugo flag and we got along really well.

Thankfully the new posters in here have given new blood to this board and all pseudo intellectuals were gulaged during the great purge.

I haven't been in Holla Forums for sometime, and although I am sympathetic to Rebel, the other bunker irc circlejerk tripfag people like yui poster and the old an-fem were insufferable pseuds.

Overall trips who need to come back are freudposter, marx poster, and Rebel. The rest can stay in the gulag.

Freud poster is still here.

i wanna be the very worst like no one ever was

to get people to hate me is my real test

to shitpost is my cause

That is pretty much all of Holla Forums. Seriously, they have a whole conspiracy theory going about how Chad gets all the girls and leaves them with nothing.

youtu.be/VR1kZnhuM3I

fight me faggot

Honestly pseuds are preferable to anti-intellectuals.

This must be why lefty/pol/ loves gulags so much.

trust me it's not

they only derail a thread and make it off-topic

Tripfaggotry overral is bad, but thankfully leftypol goes around this problem by having flags.

Me, I'm the worst. I don't even know my theory.

I have to disagree with you there. Nothing is worse than someone who has read enough wikipedia articles to think that he knows something about a subject. At least the anti-intellectuals get credit for being honest.

I kinda miss him.

Stalinist and people who can't understand the difference between justified intervention and imperialism.

Also third-world dictator apologists.

Of all the reasons to dislike Stalin, his "justified interventions" are always near the top of the list. Which "interventions" did you believe were justified?

Jim Profit

Because it is.

Marxist definition of Capitalism is quite clear. You can try to call USSR Technocratic, Theocratic, Feudal, or even Purple Quadratic Pseudo-Absolutism, but you can't call it Capitalist (after collectivisation, of course - NEP was State Capitalist as per Lenin's definition, which was justified). We need specific things for Capitalism and Soviets didn't have those.

You haven't been reading much then.

Practically everyone left of the orthodox Marxism-Leninism - from Anarchists to post-Trotskyists and pre-Dengist Maoists/Hoxhaists - uses it (directly or not). Even some of the ones to the right (RDWolff, for example) do.

It contradicts either Marxism or reliable information about USSR (often both). Generally, at a very basic level.

Not to Stalin's USSR alone.

While I do consider Stalinist period to be the apex of Socialist politics - the one that we did not surpass yet - it is quite clear that Socialism (Socialist mode of production; aka "first-stage Socialism") clearly existed in USSR since 1918, became dominant after collectivisation (1929-1933), started waning after destalinisation (1953-1961) and ended with Gorbachev (1987-1991).

There is no specific manner. Those definitions that existed before October were quite vague, the rest got developed post-factum, when Soviets were up and running for a while.

I.e. it's either justifications or shit-flinging: Bolsheviks needed to organize things at any cost, because they had a war to win; Anarchists (and LeftCom) needed to prove Bolsheviks wrong at any cost, because they had to justify their power grab.

As a result we do not have commonly accepted definition.

Both. The amount of bullshit claims is extremely high - people have been creating them it for a whole century. That's the core of my problem. You need a book or three for this.

For example, how do you argue against Socio-Imperialism? Stuff like this is not founded on anything serious and is an obvious nonsense. But to prove this to people that did not do research themselves and simply trust someone, you'd need to dig through dozens of books: first to prove reliability of your data and disprove credibility of theirs, and then to show that directors did not have an uncontrolled market of Capital (industrial goods) after Kosygin-Liberman reform, that kulaks did not magically arise in 1960s, that there was no Financial Capital in USSR for Imperialism to work.

Some even go full Solipsist and refuse to take any sources seriously. For example, one Anarchist moron ended up claiming that there could be no reliable data about Kronstadt - even in theory, because everything is just propaganda - therefore there could be no objective knowledge.

Then there will be a lot of attempts to play with semantics and theory, which would require elucidation on DiaMat and Marxist analysis in general.

Chad is a reactionary with untapped potential who should be wielded like a powerful tool by the community and mated empathetic high autism level females to mitigate his barbaric ape tendencies

Yes the USSR was capitalist. You just need two things to have capitalism in your country:

USSR had rubles as currency and the central bank was called Gosbank.

The USSR government wwas clearly capitalist apologists.

Chad does get all the girls. About 25% of males fuck over 60% of females which leaves 40% for 75% of men that are untouched. Shit is hard out there for prole manlets/facecels/autistic guys

you have no empathy and you will lose many people's hearts if you do not speak to them. Fascist propaganda must always be countered

Literally everyone who posts with a flag.

im going to start being a tripfag here so i can be the worst ok

For some reason Marx wanted to nationalize banking, rather than to abolish it. Now, why would that be?

Newsflash: BO doesn't even use IDs to let people properly argue within one thread.

I can understand why Marx would think so in his time. But the fact is banks are very dangerous and unecessary institutions. Privatized, nationalized, it's all the same shit.

So is water. People drown in it all the time. And oxygen is one of the main reasons for fires people constantly die in.

We clearly need to ban both.

worst: nazbol, rebel
best: freudposter

this

yeah he's pretty recognizable but pretty much harmless

Why does it matter whether you're arguing with a single person or not? Arguments should stand on their own merit rather than needing a fucking flag/name/trip-fag to support them.

...

The guy spamming an email right now

Worst: rebel, piratefags

Best: anfem when she posts sapphic erotica

So many to pick from.

Unironic Huxleyist Guy

it's that fagot again that upload shady file sizes

But seriously, getting with women, and this extends to all people really, is not about good you look, but how good you make them feel. Nobody wants to be around you because you are a depressing fuck, not because of how you look.

Why?

You are not "supposed" to feel anything, you just have to feel what speaks to you.
Maybe the drum solo is uninteresting to you, it doesn't "have" to be anything.

Why?

Are you some kind of neocon?

trips confirm

...

It is

underrated post

They are all the worst.

turn off your proxy you pussy faggot

Implying black coffee can be racist. Check your privilige sinner.

In this order:
Lares is pretty fucking annoying too, so might as well throw him up there. In all honesty, most trips are cancer and I hate how many leftypol has. The only trip I liked was n1x. There are a couple "identifiable posters" I like, mainly Freud Cig, Marxhead and leftcom fag.

The State Capitalist meme is only used by leftcoms because it's only valid if you believe in Marx's law of value.

This makes no sense. Marx talks about the bourgeois State taking over production. Marx's "law of value" was built as a law exclusive to capitalism, and it's telling that the Soviet economist were trying to figure out how to use that law to run an economy in equilibrium almost immediately after the formation of the SU. Stalinera piece rate system is exemplary of this.

I also have high confidence that Hillary Clinton is a agent of Satan that should be enough proof

Interesting thought.

That's what an Extraterrestrial would want you to think.

What?

the only trip I like is that Stalinist guy who doesn't even put a name

Already said that

this

Fuck no, rebel is worse. Your shitposting is actually entertaining.

when will you post your ass? if you're going to be an attention whore at least let us get something out of it.

how can you say you're not an IRC/discord faggot when i never use the name "fuckmuir" outside those platforms and twitter

you're probably a twitterfag

Because coherant conversations are impossible between a dozen people posting one anonymous post at a time. That is the entire idea behind those "write a letter to so-and-so one word at a time" threads. It is a real problem here that thread IDs would fix with no real drawbacks.

Being attractive helps, but Pamela Anderson was fucking Tommy Lee. Angelina Jolie was fucking Billy Bob Thornton. Mick Jaeger has probably fucked more chicks in his life then everyone on Holla Forums combined. It's all in the personality.

I was certain I posted this already …

Imagine police that is being tempted by bribes ten times larger; operated under the laws you have no control of - nor can you oversee the activity of police. And the arrested are delivered to be judged by the court system you have very little knowledge of and no control over.

That's the reality of Green politics in a Capitalist state. It's too corruptible to function.

What doesn't?

So? He also talks about Bourgeois exchange (law of value) dominating the early Socialism.

Since I'm not sure what you are talking about, here's a link to my post that elaborates on this:

what can you do if you get cursed with mudshit genes and want to break out of it? except killing yourself.

Get out, you heathen. Your kind insult Christ by calling yourselves, and your con-artist cult leader "prophet," His followers, despite dismissing Him and His Word and His Teaching in favor of blatant lies. You are not Christians.

Fuck completely off.

Randomly when you least expect it or not at all. I'm entertaining the idea.

Where's t/he map showing Russians with mongol ancestry, I wonder?

This douchebag is no Trump.
He's most likely in on the Chinese takeover of Canada

This.
I bet Bush is ecstatic that his name will be forgotten after how bad Trump is.

Their hate for whites is fascinating.

Why do liberals assume that drain the swamp meant ousting lobbyists and business executives? These are the people we want in. It's bureaucracy that must end.

He doesn't have to be inaugurated for us to be able to analyze his choices for his cabinet.

ITT: Salty people who have never said anything memorable.

Other stories, now deleted

web.archive.org/web/20161121114717/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/norwegian-police-arrest-20-men-in-pedophile-network-probe/2016/11/20/5a6f10d8-af3d-11e6-bc2d-19b3d759cfe7_story.html

Corbyn is Stalin 2.0. He gonna fuck you up when he gets the masses to support him.

...

This is actually quite old.

There's something new about a Mafia wife by the name of Anne Marie van Blijenburgh discussing how children were sold off to politicians and satanic pedo-rings. Her confession is on video. However the video itself is a few years old.

Color me surprised.

youtube.com/watch?v=_B-X7ox8LBg

Rebel

Kek, are you serious? Based USGS.

?

ASIAN

Not so dark, just pathetic and disappointing.

We could be something better.

They don't necessarily look that good.
Better to get the faveladas I see on TV, then?

Yeah I absolutely agree.

The correct order from worst to less bad is

1. Stalinposter namefag
2. A.W.
3. n1x
4. Rebel
5. the 2 or three anfems
6. islamposter
7. the marxposter who used to come by and was fairly well-read

I suppose you could probably rank the nameless stalin posters over the namefag cause at least he's pretty knowledgeable when it comes to history.

Honestly I used to not mind stalinman that much back when he was only a little bit active. Now he's just fucking everywhere the way anfem was for a couple months.

It took people this long to even question having hundreds of people stationed there 24/7, measuring things that could be done by satellite.

Don't worry, it'll still be a while until the truth gets reached.

Then who is fucking black women?

What happens when the workers are shit? What happens when Jose doesn't complain about working night shift, but Tyler complains keeps asking for days off because he wants to attend anime expos?

...

Example of a group of blacks being racist?

That's implicitly giving a 20 year old the all clear to fuck a 14 year old.

most of the anfem posters, but there is one that post pretty good even if i don't agree
nazbols are pretty bad too

best is probaly pirat flag in my opinon

Mark without question is the worst because he holds back the entire site. Holla Forums is the most important gateway to other boards here and he keeps people away because he runs the place just like fucking Moot did as his personal Holla Forums with video games.

Only good Holden built, everything else is fucking trash-tier

Source?

Because it is.

I don't see any giant Menorahs in the City Center, Solomon.

...

You done fucked up.

Hobbits were specifically described in letters as standing in for the quaint, unsophisticated rural English folk who were primarily affected by warfare, particularly industrialized warfare, thanks to conscription.

Elves aren't anything, they're semi-divine beings, and there are entire races of brown elves.

Men are specifically from Northern African to Eastern European in origin, and fall into the 'noble savage that is civilized by a greater race' role.

They are also all refugees are children of refugees.

wew

that was actually wrong as it said Donald would loose then on the 21st he would actually win .

MALAWI

WHAT A RARE PROXY

Libertarianism inevitably leads to socialism

texas

faggot see: