Why did every single attempt

at forming a true socialist society fail? Why did it always end in genocide?
Are we the bad guys in all this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/zIddCEBCKHQ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerated_workers'_state
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deformed_workers'_state
thenation.com/article/memoir-glasnost/
youtu.be/ePpBKZYU2Pc
northstarcompass.org/nsc9912/lies.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Most of these countries would have been shitholes with or without socialism, at least socialism usually provided social security, safety and food. Socialism is not some hex that you can cast upon a country and then every problem disappears - same with capitalism, it didn't make things better, and in some cases, even worse.

In some cases Socialism didn't fail, like in the USSR until Khrushchev revisionism - and even that was better than modern Russia.

Most of those numbers are bogus. Fuck off

Nice unsourced .gif faggot

But what about the deaths? This is an argument I can never win when talking to right wingers

Do you have a source?

It didn't

stop liberal propaganda

The sources are cited in the text. I checked them and they look credible. How do I refute this argument????

Do we have any source to show that these deaths did not happen? All I can find is stuff from websites like stalinistexpress and right wingers tell me that those are biased sources

youtu.be/zIddCEBCKHQ

Seems legit Holla Forums, nevermind that those death tolls are also taken out of context and aren't because "muh gommunism failed". For example the famines were because of a rapid shift of production and the same thing happens in capitalist states.

Also why are you pretending to be a leftist? You're not fooling anyone Holla Forums.

I've already seen this a trillion times, but it doesn't address the deaths issue.
Come on guys I'm debating a poltard I need some decent and specific links

Ffs I'm not a right wing moron. I only need sources that discredit the muh 100 gorillion argument

Anyone? Pls they are making fun of me

If you don't resist Porky, he will genocide you for dividendies.

If you resist Porky violently, you will kill a fuckload of people including the poor saps who turn class traitor.

If you resist Porky peacefully (i.e. build socialism independent from capitalist society), he will see you as a threat and genocide you.

Overt violence is better than covert violence because people will be aware of it. Every day under capitalism people fucking starve to death or die of exposure when we easily have enough food and shelter for everyone. People don't see or understand this. If the violence is brought to the surface (DAPL is a good example), people will start to see the true nature of the system. Violence is built in, but typically happens via artificial scarcity rather than bullets or grenades flying.

But I told them that those genocides never happened. For fuck's sake I made a fool of myself

The first rule of not being an ass is to not talk about shit you don't know about. At the very least if you get stuck on something, saying you don't know will make you less of an ass than bullshitting will.

Damnit. Ok

And if you get stuck on something you should ask why you don't know the answer. If it's "because I don't know the subject as well as I should" then you fucked up talking about it like you're an authority. If it's "because the other person raises a point I've never considered" then maybe you're wrong and you should evaluate which position has better support for it. This is something that 99.9% of people struggle with.

Degenerated workers' state
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerated_workers'_state

Deformed workers' state
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deformed_workers'_state

In March 1989 "In the last bus coming to Moscow, there were veterans carrying quite graphic propaganda: a portrait of Brezhnev wearing medals and a portrait of Gorbachev wearing rationing coupons.""
thenation.com/article/memoir-glasnost/

Capitalism has killed more people than any tankie despot.

(checked)
it is a mystery

It's not like right-wing parties don't kill people.
Most of the figures are also false or highly over-estimated, counting things such as famines and natural disasters.

Hello, Holla Forums.

No, your Third Reich wasn't Socialist.

I think you mean Marxist. And it's an obvious consequence of concentrating all political power in a single party and class.
Marxism fails because dictatorships of the proletariat can only collapse or devolve into tyranny.

Also

What deaths issue? Revolutions cause deaths is someone really trying to argue that?

This is a whole new level of tankie

Oh I thought you were only referring to the examples in that video.

If you want to be able to explain why the tankie states didnt attain socialism I have a video for that too:

youtu.be/ePpBKZYU2Pc

This. With the exception of Yugoslavia (and I can't really speak on them), every single one of those states was ML(M) or whatever the hell Cambodia was.

ML(M) is just a guide for Third World shitholes to get on the international big boy table, with no actual socialist doctrine.

northstarcompass.org/nsc9912/lies.htm

what about this OP?

Because they tried to change the superstructure without changing the base.

Capitalism is starving millions and kills tens of thousands every day.

Capitalism is a death machine.

b8

Don't forget the millions dead from the United States "Shock Therapy" policy towards Russia following the collapse of the Soviet Union.