Hegel

Sup, L-pol. Been a while, and it will be another while after this. Been busy reading fucking books and not looking at this shit board. I've been reading the Phenomenology (again) and am writing summary blogs. Written quite a few on the Science of Logic explaining some stuff that may be pertinent to Marxists. Translated an article from.Spanish to English about the Logic and Capital, read it you ignrants.

empyreantrail.WordPress.com/blog

I've posted the Phenomenology live reading discussions on my mixcloud

tiny.cc/Omzehy

For those who like diagrams, I'm working on Phenom ones for now, the Logic is on my backburner for now.

Other urls found in this thread:

m.mixcloud.com/Anthony_Wolf/
empyreantrail.wordpress.com/2016/10/10/translationmarx-without-reservations-six-thesis-for-interpreting-capital-in-light-of-hegels-logic/
scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-00622016000200014&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
archive.is/4PC0U
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Reminder to post the diagrams on your blog and that there is nothing wrong with Zizek's "irrational" Schellingian Hegel. I've noticed something, you like Pragmatist readings of Hegel don't you?

Also are you Vladimir Rachmaninov?

...

Your dog looks very fat

m.mixcloud.com/Anthony_Wolf/

Just look at the play lists.


There is everything wrong with Schellibgian irrationalism. I like pragmatic readings because they are fascinating, but I have Hegelian reading myself (practice is in there prominently, but nowhere as heavy as pragmatists). I align myself closest to Winfield on this due to our similar autism for logic, an autism I think just bleeds out of any textual reading of Hegel as opposed to hermeneutic and historical readings.

But aren't the Hegelian Pragmatists a bunch of liberals?

Bernstein is a pragmatist, not liberal, idealist, and pessimist.

Hegelian Marxists are pragmatists by way of praxis and activity as their main categories of theory.

Brandon is a pragmatist, but idk about his politics. He's a liberal if you consider dialectics and rational conversation without killing each other such.

Do communists forget they are the heirs of philosophical liberalism? The point of communism is to cash out the real promise of liberalism and capitalism. Marxism fails at that, but oh well.

are you a leftist?

Do you guys still do this on mumble, are have you migrated to some private discord thingy?

Shit i lost the fat doggo pic.

This will do it for now.

what the fuck

newfag

I'm more left and materialist than L-pol combined.

Looks nothing like Balboa :^(

How are you a materialist?

Ah yes, the boy who still doesn't understand the 11 theses.

Says the guy who understands but does not comprehend ;)


Get past the enlightenment and at least make it to Kantianism, bucko.

Tell me again what overdetermination is (^:

Who are you supposed to be? I'd say a faggot with an unwarranted sense of self-importance but that describes all tripfags so you'll have to be a bit more specific.

I just decided to checkout this article because it is relevant to my interests and found myself rather disappointed with what was found.

Direct link to blog entry in question:

empyreantrail.wordpress.com/2016/10/10/translationmarx-without-reservations-six-thesis-for-interpreting-capital-in-light-of-hegels-logic/

It is quite clear the article was machine translated and to claim it was a personal translation is extremely shameful, and whats more it seems as though the blog owner was even attempted to mask this by mixing together both the windows live machine translation and google translation. The paragraphs in this "translation" are full of almost copy paste lines (maybe with some slight editing) from both of these sources. This is shockingly dishonest and makes me highly question the integrity of anything else written here.

scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-00622016000200014&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es

Honestly he most likely just took it from the link above and just selected the automatic translation, in this menu it gives the option of both translations. Don't just believe me, check for yourself if you doubt these claims.

He's a top bloke.

Gotta try harder with that stupidity of your's, son. This isn't even trolling, step up the game.

Don't be mad that I'm fluent in two languages and can understand a third enough to get daily and academic banter.

I'm the Hegelian mastermind behind this board, along with 'the Swede', my alternate world mirror self left-com flag poster. Together we post all the worthwhile theory discussion on this board.

I would hardly consider calling out the fact that the article was machine translated, constructed in a dishonest way in order to disguse this and was then claimed by you to be a personal translation to be either stupidity or trolling.

Personally I am not mad, instead I am only disappointed.

Well then I know you're full of shit because there's no way a leftcom would do anything.

All you need to know about this dumbass here.
archive.is/4PC0U


How stupid does he think people are really.

Still butthurt about your non-knowledge of science as such I see.

I was right then, and I'm still right now.

About as stupid as himself I would guess.

No ones butthurt about the neighborhood retard, everyone just pokes fun and laughs at him.

A.W. by and large, you are insufferable. That being said, if you can explain the master/slave dialectic to me I will forgive your shitposting.

Read Fanon.

Message me on Twitter or reddit. How do people not understand that section?. It's pretty straight forward. Mind you I'll get to it in two weeks in my reading group, which will make my understanding that much clearer.

Why don't you go back and stay there? those places clearly suit your sort much more than here.

The reception of the thought of Hegel in the Marxist tradition has varied with the course of history. Despite a common recognition of the dependence of Marx with respect to Hegel (mainly in his youth period), there has always existed the attempt to eliminate all traces of Hegelianism in the works of Marx, and tied to this, a strong denial of dialectic. We can name, for example, the revisionism of Eduard Bernstein in Germany, the works of Althusser and his school in France, and the interpretation of De La Volpe and Colleti in Italy. It is not our intention here to make an examination of all these interpretations, nor to give a general diagnostic about the question. We depart, instead, from the presupposition that it is impossible to comprehend the development of the economic forms in Marx’s Capital without a deep study of Hegel’s Science of Logic. It is from within this perspective that we present, in the form of theses, some general guidelines that, in our judgment, cross the horizon of any Hegelian reading of Marx.

HAHAHAHAHA

Because your stupidity is funny. Why don't you read a book and quit being ignorant? If you did there would be nothing to be ashamed of for you would be wise. Instead of educating yourself, however, you rail against me for showing your ignorance plain as day before others. You hate me as the Athenians hated Socrates for showing then they didn't know shit.

Loserpol, feels>realz indeed.

What?
You know people who use Holla Forums hate those places, right? Of course you're going to engender mistrust if you bring that shit here. Keep all that shit on their own sites, the cross-pollution of the internet is partially why everywhere is so terrible nowadays.

It's not my fault you are all to stupid to use the email function here. Every single time I out up.my email I get zero despite people asking for a way to contact me. Well, since you're all tech impaired I give you two clear options: message me on twitter or reddit.

Get bent or get lost.

Nobody actually uses their fucking email address on imageboards, you dolt. That field is for saging, noko, dice, shit like that. That's why nobody emails you. Or, if you mean you post it in the body field, then just nobody wants to talk to your insufferable ass. Perhaps, rather than stupidity, the reason is distaste for you.

It's OK if you want to talk to me, just come find me when you're done being butthurt.

Looking at it put plainly in-front like this makes me think that it really is astonishing that he would try and pass this off as his own work.

Could you fuck off again? This place improved markedly with your absence.

What's your email?

[email protected]/* */

Wtf!
What a liar and fraud!

How 2 communist dwarf fortress

...

You see, I know AW has read more than me and has a greater and deeper understanding of socialism than I do. But I also realize I can get read without having to subject myself to the condescending, know-it-all, pompous tripfag.

bump

Hegel is not a total idealist fam unlike Schopenhauer full idealism.

Hegel's idealism is built upon some materialist foundation his idealism is a materialist idealism, same thing with Marx being idealist materialist.

read hegel PoS -The realization of rational self-consciousness through itself, -pleasure and necessity.

Whats this have to do with AW?

...

You have been reading Zizek haven't you?