Who is the biggest traitor in vidya?

You guys are fucking faggots.

That honestly wouldn't be that much of a shock with how fucked Bullworth was.

I'm fucking dying.

I know user, but that got me thinking about vidya traitors in general.

I'm really having a hard time coming up with any decent ones that you can't see coming from a mile away.

I guess Fontaine is probably the best one

Thats because video games stories are like a porn movie story, only retards care about it

...

Fucking Gold

I bet the space jews did this.

...

This little shit right here. I was genuinely pissed when I was a kid and played Terranigma.

There were bigger images, but they either looked like shit or were deviantart tier fanart

...

That shithead in THUG. Felt good to get the good bonus ending by beating all the missions on SICK.
Eric Fucking Sparrow.
I want to actually choke the guy.

I still hope people on Holla Forums only pretend to be gay

Yeah, that's what they are doing

Shoo shoo goon.

When you pretend for that long just for irony's sake, it eventually makes you gay.
Think about it, people in this site and on the internet in general became gay or developed certain fetishes because of memes. Can't get any more of a tool than that. How many people realized they like to be cucked due to the cuck meme? First they made fun of Anthony Burch, next thing you know they're in /wx/ requesting bbc cuckold porn or sissy hypno.

...

I am gay.

I'm gay user

d-does it also work for jedi powers?

hahaha, never gets old

user, I'm seriously gay. You know how much dick I suck? none because im an autist

You need at least 1 STD to become truly gay.

You wanna give it to me user?

...

He broke my heart user!

Okay this guys was just a douchebag!

Hey, at least you're not Anthony Burch

yeah
does this shit also applies to GAMURR GURRLS that pretend to like video games?

Counterpoint: if he wasn't a dick, you couldn't get the Trader's Card.

Get it? Trader? Traitor!

Nice false flagging, faggot.

You can't be sure of that, actually.

Pavel has to be one of the best backstabbing bastards since he is a very likable character.

Yep, the sections with him were pretty enjoyable

Did you end up saving him after his fight?

Chaos

...

Yes.

I'm gay

Kill yourself.

i have a big folder full of gachimuchi music videos

This is a good thread for all the wrong reasons.

...

The biggest traitor in vidya's history

...

Come on, he just wants to sacrifice your reborn baby version to satan.

She Betrayed everyone to protect her country, everything she did was for snake. Yes, she is a traitor, but her betrayal was for a good cause

Not exactly a traitor, but literally manipulates the protag without his consent

What are you, some libshit Holla Forums poster?

not going to lie to you it's clearly _____

Making a bunch of money from autists is betrayal now?

...

They were never only pretending, they were just making a meme out of their homosexuality

I mean if someone killed my best friend with nerve gas and my only way to get revenge was to brainwash some foreigner into getting the revenge for me, I'd do it.

>or kill them both and take over the world by yourself using your time traveling super powers

Notch is a traitor, but you shouldn't feel too bad anyway since Notch stole Minecraft from /agdg/

At the end of the day he's still a cuck fighting the ebil nazis for Israel

Right because some Russian faggots (and one German) wanting to use nerve gas and have COMMUNISM take over the world is somehow an ebil nazi

The nazis did a lot of shitty stuff, user. Look up Oskar Dirlewanger and Walter Schellenberg.

They also discovered aspirins, created the autobaghn and did nothing wrong.

I was going to post this.

...

She’s a feminist mary sue inserted anachronistically with a motivation that makes no sense and a dream that is fucking bullshit that goes against human nature. She sold out her country. Kill yourself.

There is no bigger traitor than The Boss.

Sure they did, moishe.
Crash course me on what they did that is supposed to be bad.

It's really hard to tell how it actually happened because the exhibit in poland is extremely biased (the guy conducting the research was a "holocaust survivor" or something) but what he basicly did is to prevent a bunch of revellions in Polish territory through systematic repression. The exhibit says he went around killing random women and children for no reason but I find that hard to believe as that was going against direct orders from Berlin; and fuckig Rommel was killed for doing less than that.
>Walter Schellenberg
He was basicly nazi 007, he was the master of JUST AS PLANNED in the SS. I honestly don't see anything particulary evil about this guy, well he was under Himmler's orders and Himmler was a fucking retard and edgy for no reason but he's pretty average for an SS spy.

I guess what Schlomoanon is trying to talk about is the Venlo Incident, where he managed to pose as an MI6 agent and discover their plot to overthrow Hitler before going "IT WAS ACTUALLY I, WALTER, ALL ALONG" and kidnapping the most important officers of MI6, this being the most shameful event in the organization's history.

You reap what you sow.

He was a bro wich betrayed you because it was his duty, not a faggot.

Holla Forums please stop being so dense and trying to be the anti-fun gestapo.

...

I mean, Walter Schellenberg was so fucking good at his job that he managed to outcharm the jews in Nuremberg trials, succesfully going out unpunished to live in Italy for his entire life until he died of cancer.

How fucking delusional are you?

user, this might be hard to believe, but if you wouldn't fuck THIS piece of girlyboy ass, then maybe you're the gay one.

I thought Kojima gave no fucks, and this was just his silly writing.

Kill yourself

What is up with this annyoing homo constantly showing up at threads, quoting noone and posting underage mexicans dressed as girls?

Shhh, you cant tell him that his boogeyman doesnt apply to the situation at hand or else youre a cuck.

where can I get more of that pic?

Google 'Princess Marco'

I'm guessing that is the artists self-insert

It's Marco from Star vs. The Forces of Evil, dingus

This faggot right here.

good god

Please, user. At least put some effort into your shitposting. Using a strawman outs this as being your first day on an image board.

I'd agree with that.

Her entire speech about borders and not being able to see them from space.

I mean a "world without borders" fucking retarded and pointless. People will always have in-group preferences and will segregate themselves according to cultural and genetic similarities.

The boss was retarded, and jack and his double were smart for not interpreting "world without borders" to literally mean wipe out all borders and allow billions of incompatible low value genetic groups to simply waltz into higher value areas. It'd turn the entire civilized world into Europe depicted in "Children of Men" what a fucking shit show that would be.

What are you talking about? How could Gods chosen people betray the ungrateful foreigners that they brought the light of civilisation to?

That fuck always asks you to help him fight the french when you're a small shitty province like Luxembourg, but god forbid you're Sweden or Greece and the russians/Ottomans are pushing your shit in and ask for help.

Which one are you, Holla Forums?

Don't drink the water.

Far left because I'm super hairy.

THAT WAS MY VIDEO YOU CUNT

Bioware.

That's hot as fuck.

I got the last ending accidentally, just to see what would happen if I shot them both.
I was so fucking satisfied it was in the game. I fully expected for it to be impossible.

Lol either sarcasm or autism.

...

This movie looks good. I wonder why I never heard of it before.

Because it's a white hate film.

The last hope for mankind is an african nigger and her baby.

he didnt learnt nothing, death brings more death

He also shard that pain, that is what the little ayy said whit his aura vision bullshit

Yeah it does get rather warm sometimes.

Well yes, i did not justify what he did, only saying that you cant call him a faggot for wanting to carry on with his duty and his ideals.
I did forgive him, he was my mate pavel.

but how, they would take the same spot

Wow that looks like me.

Mine too, my chest hair spreads out like an eagle. I used to be self conscious but now I'm very comfortable with it.

Feels high test man.

Marco is…okay.

Maybe it's because I meet too many Mexicans and emo/jap boy sounds more exotic.

I can't reject a thicc boy though.

That's weird logic. Like implying any apocalyptic scenario that "leaves races out" is somehow purposefully meant to target that group and insult them. I really hope you're not that paranoid that you might call Fallout an "Abbo Hate Simulator".

Wow, talk about not getting the fucking point. Boss was banging her Soviet counterpart, a love that became forbidden during the cold war. Her talk about seeing the 'world without borders' was really just a euphemism for her desire that people not let nationalism divide them when they have feelings for each other.

Her entire desire was just to live her life the way she wanted, not by the selfish whims of her nation. Learn to read fucking subtext, jesus.

huey did nothing wrong

No nigga, the premise is that white people destroyed the world and made humanity infertile.

The only reason people still exist is because everyone is biologically immortal. For whatever reason the only identifiable reason are the minorities, arabs, gypsies, niggers, etc. Everyone else is as bland as a piece of bread.

That's not gay, that just means you're a fan of manly wrestling and leather,nothing wrong there

Watch it until the end, user.

The only identifiable peoples

Did the PC version ever work, or am I relegated to emulating?

it works, only complains are that the keyboard controls are worse than the controller ones, but it's playable

They did not imply "white people did it!" at any point, they were talking about humanity at large, you paranoid fuck.
Movies dont need to be solely populated by white people to be politically correct for you.

I don't think we watched the same movie. I don't recall whites being to blame for it at all, more like the elite or society as a whole. Nor do I recall race being such an overtly important thing.

Then again, I probably didn't go into the film with that mindset or a preconceived worldview where race is this incredibly important thing.

If anything the balls would be slightly infront of the vagina

You couldn't have a fully functional ballsack and uterus.

8ch seems to be populated by homosexual Nazis. Either that, or everyone is playing a massive joke on me.

ftfy

...

WOULD YOU LIKE A MILO MEAL?

This image gave me withdrawal.

Friendly reminder that the company that owns Poptarts got angry about being included in this sketch originally.

Holla Forums - very gay

no a large amount of Holla Forums are closet gays, cucks and interracial fetishists.

Would you like a tasty, nutritious Milo Meal, sir?~
It's Yiannopoulos flavored

Let's not forget the Christian Atheists too and morbidly obese anorexic people.

She was literally the daughter of (((philosopher))) and her ideology went on to create the La-li-lu-le-lo aka Cipher which means CODE (pic related). Only a fool would still think the Boss was a hero.

Christian atheism is actually a thing, though.

Fuck, marry, kill.

Transgender is a "thing" too. equally delusional.

Kill you

Don't be butthurt, I'm sure you're the non-Nazi kind of butt pirate.

Judaism?

The man helping you is an old-fashioned true believer in communism user. This is why siding with him turns the world into the USSR. Than main antagonist is just a dictator pretending to be a commie. The correct choice is still killing both though.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_atheism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

It was popular once.

I choose kill.

Christian Atheism is a thing, user.

So deism.

He's a jew, so that's not him. Still, gross.

Uncut is hot as fuck, not my fault you were forced to suck the smegma out of your rapists dick.

thank you for corrupting fascism

Indeed. There are were legit Christian atheists at some point. Basically they follow Jesus, but admit that he wasn't holy and there is no God. Jefferson probably believed in some sort of God, but he was certainly attacked as an atheist during his time. He had some weird beliefs, and he liked hitting up dat black booty. Jefferson was an odd man.

The vast majority of people here aren't fascist, user. Most of what you mentioned isn't fascist.

Sage for the inevitable meme-based, frenzied backlash.

I don't understand

I wonder if she takes it up the ass to preserve "technical virginity."

that is because Subjectivism is such a stupid and untenable philosophical basis that heretics like Jefferson where smart enough to not forgo the metaphysical assumption of absolute Truth. The funniest part about Atheist is most are Subjectivist but hold to materialism. Talk about an Oxymoron!

yes the majority of Holla Forums are deranged NEETs that jerk off to futanari & my little pony that think they will be troll-shielded if they hang out on le edgy chan's. tbh you ought to get /fit/ & find God or an hero.

btw where the video games?

It would mean they follow his beliefs and teachings without believing in him being a god, right? As a different example, many jews who attend synagogues are atheist, merely wrapping themselves in the goyhating culture of synagogues without truly believing in the existence of YHVH.

...

Second getting /fit/, but no way to find God.

...

...

Thinking Jesus married Mary Magdelin or Lilith and they now live in the garden of eden isn't as stupid as most of the things in the bible. Everything you think christianity is about was decided by a bunch of Bishops and priests who needed to standardize christianity and not piss off a majority of christians. That's why you have shit like the Gospel of Judas where Jesus told him to betray him and that he was the only true disciple when this runs contrary to everything else. Then you have major inconsistencies in the gospels of Peter, Matthew, Luke, and Mark which invalidates the others.

Essentially christians are christians because they blindly follow authority figure and believe whatever is printed as long as it has fancy enough script and gold leaf somewhere.

God = Absolute Truth, the Highest Order, the aristotlian Unmoved Mover. It's the epistemological basis for all reason, morality and objectivity. Sure no one person could know All Truth in their life time. Therefore this Absolute Truth is transcendental of mortal man. However it is this absolute Truth that governs the Natural Law we are all subject too. So when I say "find God" I mean rather a devotion to seeking truth and that which is virtuous. A big problem with modernity is liberals have rejected objective truth, which is why we have nut-jobs trying to use there will to power to force others to accept their feminine penis's.

Christians talk about absolute "T"ruth yet actively shill for the prattle of John et al as if anyone should bother with a secondhand account of something so important. Jefferson did more for Christianity by condensing the Bible into something that material power seekers can't use to subvert "the Truth" in a way that benefits them.

Reported.

I don't care about state of the penis, I talking about the fact that that's a tied up faggot about to be eaten.

So, by definition, are not Christian. Therefore “Christian atheists” don’t exist.

Just report everything about the kike faggot you see.

You're just spouting nonsense, m8.

Nevermind this

I don't see your problem with Jefferson or Deism aka Christian Atheism for whatever retard decided that was a good term.

What the fuck is even going on in this thread?

I'm not the one who named them. They called themselves that.

Once Gematria gets involved things tend to go off the rails.

Also I need sauce on this song, I'm starting to think it was made for this webm

kill yourself gayder

Obviously vidya, what else?

Sunflower spurdo is a shit. Physicality that is not constantly aware of whence it has come and totally volitional is a shit. Do not be an apologist for the demon spheres of the tetragrammaton and the cube.

Do you think birds get angry at the shell of their eggs? Because that's what you're doing.

Good goy

well Deism is certainly more rational then Atheism.

Sorry, I actually was thinking the same thing just now. I'd like to know the source myself.

You cannot say with absolute certainty truth is subjective. It in itself is a paradox. You cannot assume to find material evidence unless you first assume there is an order to the universe. Nothing nonsense about my position.

btw where the video games?

Lolno

And it's "more rational than atheism", not then. Learn English, nigger.

In you're opinion. It's the same idea as someone pointing as the sun and saying "That's the basis of everything, that must truly be god!" You're just kicking the can down the road and making the definition of god vague and vaguer as the places he can be and exist are whittled away. For the record before the first rockets went into outer-space many christians believed that they'd pierce the firmament and flood the world.
Very convenient, don't you think?
It's pretty funny that you're talking about 'objective' truth when you believe in something that is scientifically unproveable or understandable by your own words. You believe in subjective truth and you're complaining that someone else believes in equally stupid shit without proof.

Fun posting

It makes more sense than the christian idea of the universe. An impersonal god who shit everything out to see what would happen meshes much better with reality than a supposedly loving god who spends roughly 4000 years helping the jews fuck everyone over, making cancer, hell, sin, the human capacity of suffering; If the christian god was all powerful and loving then he literally could have made us with free will but without all the possible negatives to existing.

Nothing can truly be objective because all of our experiences are subjective.

Doesn’t matter what they call themselves. I can call myself a woman and it doesn’t make me one. Fucking learn how to read.

Not sure where I, Deism or Jefferson said that.

You sure bitch like one.

Biology doesn't give a fuck about your feelings.

If you give sergury to a dog and make it look like a cat, it's still a fucking dog. Have some bussy

This is a strawman m8. Divine simplicity. God is LOGOS (Greek) meaning supreme reason, highest order. It is the necessary philosophical presupposition that Truth can be known in part. You are merely obfuscating the metaphysical necessity.
wew fedora tipping scientism, giving me a lecture on objectivity and the scientific method. Truth is mind body mind-body independent. You can't change the world with wishful thinking m8.
HA HA HA HA HA! You are now just pretending to be retarded right?

Your autism doesn't let you get it. I didn't say they were totes Christians, and when I said you bitch like a woman, I didn't say that to mean that transgender is a real thing. Stop posting. You're displaying your autism too strongly.

mind body

...

Says the man that is arguing against a method that consistently produces results in favor of a belief in a vague notion of "god".

So god is a vague concepts? 'Supreme reason, Highest order"? What's next? God is love? Happiness? The idea of a rock?
Truth is a human concept, one that we base on our fallible human senses, unless of course you can someone objectively prove that a soul or some other metaphysical which isn't hampered by out limited and subjective human abilities exist. You can't
So you believe everything you see, hear, touch, smell and taste are all infallible? Are you 100% sure that everything you experience is as it is at face value?

You do know that pride is a sin, right :^)?

You ready for this, playah?

Science is not in rejection of God, it is in concert with God. Just as man cannot defy the laws (of gravity), they must comply with the law (of aerodynamics) to achieve flight. It's not my my fault you have a heretical plebeian view of this esoteric knowledge. obviously this stuff is over your head, you likely assume all Theist are Evangelical young earth creationist. Are you even familiar with Platinism? I am not making a argument for a Christian God. I am merely making a basic argument for Objective Absolute Truth (which is God by definition). Call it Brahman or Atman or whatever you like. It is the Order which supersedes all Natural Order by logical necessity for any reason to follow.

You're attempt to argue against an esoteric philosophy with superficial exoteric reasoning. Nobody claims that the "base" understanding Hindus who practice Bakti yoga reduces the philosophical argument of metaphysical strains of the same faith. This is also true of Christianity.

Was he a traitor?

How can you say this with any certainty or conviction? If truth is Subjective then what prohibits God from being true?
Yes I know its a sin and I am not guilty of it silly goose.

You sound mad, how about you stop making yourself look like a retard instead?

How do you know this?
Even if you weren't a belief in god itself is irrational. There is no reason to think there is a god.
Vaguely, I went to school to study physics, not to get a liberal arts degree.
Why is it god and not something else? And how do you know this objective absolute truth?
Why is this logical necessity? Justify it.

Well, they definitely peck incessantly until they get out. Furthermore, birds are not sapient beings arbitrarily imprisoned in flesh by a delusional 'one' godhead with the effectual consent of the actual One who allows said scenario and all other possible and impossible scenarios to play out in his unpointful schizoid dreamings, his authorial creation, loved indirectly as a whole, and this love never shown in truth to those within. They are apparatuses, or at best, even more limited and aborted beings than men. If the bird had sense, it would break its egg early and poison all others with the rot of the yolk.

Ask yourself this, now. What would be the point of such an existence? Place man into paradise. He will rot away. Bring him to salvation in the Christian fashion as the bride of the Christ, bring them up into the 'kingdom of God' to be alike to the angels, singing 'Glory, glory' to him on the throne for eternity. Pure bliss in the minds of these men, without sin, and without action, brought on by nothing. A hollow existence as a petty archetype of the ideal of the suffering, devoid of value in its attainment, as there is no one left to desire and seek it. It would be even more meaningless if there were no road towards it, and if one places roads away as in the fashion of the Indo-European Yuga cycle, that only brings further horrifying snarls into the matter.

Man's capacity for virtue is dialectically constrained by his own capacity for unvirtue or else that of other beings. If there is a sphere of existence in which these elements are not balanced, then another sphere will exist in parallel to counteract this. For every pointless heaven- every ideal existence, unconnected to any other- imagined by wanting men, there will be an equally monstrous hell, existing without justification, without point, save to be in opposition to this dreaming. The author that is the One will dream unbidden and eternally. Every monstrosity you can conceive will exist somewhere and somehow in another sphere in the One Author's continual dabblings in every possible sphere, and more you cannot conceive of, but that he can. Every sphere that is otherwise will be like ours, a dialectic in itself full of even more pointed suffering, as there is relief to contrast it against, or else will be rotten and petty and vulgar, desirable only until one is within it and grows sickened by it, if his capacity for disgust at the flab of paradise is not stolen.

The answer to the troublesome nature of existence is not to create any heaven on earth or exterior to it. It is to obliterate heaven and earth so that hells may not exist, to overtake the dreamer and obliterate every sphere and all within them, and subsequently obliterate the self while leaving behind a strictly defined placeholder-thing, a plug on the dialectic of existences, to prevent any kind of god from the gap as in Genesis from appearing uncreated from nowhere and nowhen. A something-nothing from which a nothing-something cannot spring, since it is conceived and defined as the timeless void of both space and nonspace, positive and negative, in such fashion that it is not a dialectic to the no longer existent whole of reality and cannot beget it as an opposite, which can spawn no consciousness and no change, because there is no longer any change to be had or anything to change. A gray nowhere, and nowhen, and nohow, and nowhy. It is, and no other thing is, nor can there be any other things in concept to be apart from it in a new sphere. A total streamlining and rationalization of the irrational cosmic-conceptual foam of the One. That one can conceive of it means that the One may also conceive it, and also may conceive the overturning of his throne, at which point it is an inevitability. An invasive, self-extinguishing thought, though we cannot yet observe its effect in our sphere.

V I D E O G A M E S

You must think heaven doesn't exist, or heaven precludes free will.

I really don't either. Best I can think of is they want to be part of the religious club, but also be able to be smarmy atheists to.

You have to remember that radical secularism was all the rage back then as Europe had not (and never fully did) recover from the Wars of Religion that followed the protestant schism.

This was a way for them to keep Christian ethics without having to steep themselves in the metaphysics, which they thought was the danger.

That's the funny part you seem to miss. I don't have to you are a Subjectivist. You don't believe in any objective truth, which is why its even funnier that you put so much faith in the objective sciences that presupposes objective truth can be observed and measured. You have no logical basis for reason, no yard yardstick as your ruler. No foundation to work with. I can just force you to believe what ever I tell you to believe because you are a NEET pushover. :^)

Dismiss all retards.

Any jews in vidya?

Did I say that?
I don't believe I've ever found such a truth, nor do I have a method of establishing it. If you do, then show me.
Science makes the assumption that the world is as we see it and that we can measure it inside of this framework. The funny part is that it seems to work. Tell me, what great discoveries have been made by your sophistry?
I don't really need one, nor do I want one. The assumption that I've made, and that every other scientist makes seems to work in what we perceive to be reality.
Obviously not, since you keep posting retarded shit.

Nothing is right, everything is wrong, Trannies are actually normal, why? because they think they're normal.

Checkmate faggot, there's no logical reason to hate gays or niggers. Stupid fucking christians.

seriously. Love is love, and the logical conclusion to all things is, life has no inherent meaning, so I can do what I want.

You right wing nazis are the same as leftists.

1. Disgust response
2. Competition with other species for resources

Otacon is a Jew.

1. Disgust is an emotion, an illogical emotion
2. Technology will fix that, science will fix that.

Deal with it.

No, things that have evidence behind them could be right, but we might not have enough evidence to say something is "truth".
Normal or abnormal, it doesn't really matter. We don't know that there is any biological reason for their behavior, nor is it found elsewhere in the natural world. We can theorize that they are just mentally ill.
I don't hate anyone.
I mean, sure, you could do that. You might go to prison, but you could do what you want.
But I'm not a Nazi.

yeah, rotting meat is totally edible, I don't understand why people are so disgusted by it

Actually disgust seems to be a rudimentary survival mechanism. Things that make you sick or can kill you might disgust you.

Heaven in the sense of a trap laid by Yaldabaoth to ensare those whom are virtuous but unwise into singing praise for eternity to maintain his delusion of being the One exists. Heaven in the sense of some Pleromatic exterior total-place where the true One dwells and mingles with his splitaway consciousnesses also exists. And Heaven as an ideal sphere of plenty for those fallen, a vulgar land of milk and honey, that too exists. These as concepts, or else as fully accessible places from our own sphere based on its laws or overriding laws imposed from outside it. All are abhorrent in their own ways. Further, one's being created at all precludes free will in any true sense. If you have been steered in any way whatsoever, if your being is manufactured, you and your actions are not your own save by what you may take through this unfree will by impossibly directed force. But, if it can be conceived at all, then it is not impossible if the rules are bent.

This unfreeness is the case regardless of whether a universe is in part capable of being directed by those inside- the classic argument of 'you've been given a choice, but within boundaries' used by those who attempt to justify the great morass of human souls being treated as a gigantic moral petri dish with a largely hands off approach- or if it is thoroughly predestined, either by the material nature of the world directing mens' wills or the metaphysically written course of hearts hardened and souls saved regardless of the material elements they exist within. The only will that is free is a conscious will which may by volition do any and all things, in other words, that of the One and of any other author, and his choice is to frivolously create, for which he is despised by me either by his authorial writing of my course or by my own unfree will.

One: if emotion is illogical, then why follow it when it is convenient to the current course and disregard it when it is not, rather than following its natural course and disregarding the present twisting? What benefit is there to the tolerance of vice without utility as opposed to utility in the destruction of vice? If the natural disgust response has taken us this far- whether it is rooted in flesh or spirit- why act as thoroughly against its advisory as possible?

Two: if one is going to take a cold, technocratic argument, why go to the trouble of maintaining species of men whom are a net loss in the physical realm to one's preferred group when it is cheaper to obliterate and replace them to increase the surplus made available by technological advances? Why attempt to graft a greater ability to them when a preextant superior template is readily available and reproducible?

First of all, reported for being a kike.
Point one, pic related.
Point two, link related: heyjackass.com
Reported for ADMITTING to being nothing more than a shill who knows nothing about the topic.

I bet you think morality is relative.

How do you know this?

Heh

...

He's clearly being sarcastic because I won't agree with him and his stupid viewpoints.

If this is true why do they have abnormal suicide rates?

Checkmate Hare Krishna.

holy fuck, i really cant understand how germany lost

that's half Holla Forums, and they're not closet.

it's easy to get confused because the fags and the Nazis both post smug anime girls

sorry confused you with 04bea5
So you are a Subjectivist
WEW
(pic related)
then you are technically a Desist. You might be agnostic but you are not an Atheist if you presume a knowable "framework"
See Aristotle

The Boss was also likely a Jew see:

Oi Bruv! Datz Bigoted, u gotz to go to Jail!
:^)

...

No, I don't even know what you mean by this. Explain in plain language. Not all of us are pedantic shitposters.
I don't believe there is a god, so I'm still an atheist, and this framework is an artificial one. Science didn't spring out of nature. We invented it.

Well, I've conceived it, haven't I? We've seen enough Biblical nonsense to reasonably assume that it is a somewhat accurate course of things, but also know that it has been thoroughly tainted from its roots, which appear to be gnostic. The gnostics persecuted by the Chalcedonians, the Catholics, so on, were quite uniform in their belief of the Old Testament godhead as being the adversary and ruler of the material realm, being possessed by a virulent anti-Judaism and firmly convinced that Abraham had made covenant with this thing, not the true godhead, who merely co-opted the prophetic schema of the false godhead to poison the well, though this went both ways. For these beliefs, they were repressed, and butchered when they gathered in number. Revelations, meanwhile, is terribly often regarded as being merely the work of a Jewish radical attempting a self-fulfilling prophecy of Roman collapse, of 666 or 616 referring to Nero and not the hexagram, yet is also made to fit present events, suggesting again some manner of well poisoning.

It's easy to conclude that if the One does not throw his infinite weight around as totally as possible- and he has not thrown it around at all as far as we can see, carrying out a minimum of action- that there will be men enraptured and stolen away once more by the false godhead into a narcissist sphere to sing his praises at the same time as others are lifted out from the ruin of the earth to elseplaces. And the possibility that both are utterly false and that instead there is some other truer metaphysical model in play is also possible. And also that the course of things as suggested by the post-Chalcedonian Christians is somehow true, for which one wonders why what appears to be the original physical world-despising gnostic wellspring would actually be the poison and also would fail utterly to resurge instead of unrelated and rankly disgusting universalisms, along with the impotent continuance of the post-Chalcedonian, whittled and corrupted ever further.

Even if my preferred assertions are not correct, the secondary possibilities do not affect the argument of misotheism or at the very least dystheism in the nature of any creator as being inherently frivolous for having created to begin with, including both any original godhead-dreamer archetype and any impotent ruler of lower worlds that is left to his devices by the former in spite of his persecutions upon those in his sphere, they merely leave less room as to who can be to any degree right and make those who are ever more arbitrary and frivolous in being right, because why construct things in such an arbitrary manner to begin with? Or at all? How can you judge a being you have authored and dictated entirely either in predestination or the creation of unfree scenarios for them to bumble through? How can one not be held as guilty for creating and loving heroes and villains alike, and bringing any of said parties to ruin simply for the observation of said effect?

The world, if it is a created one and is not some absurd uncreated material-determinist mess of heat death and pointlessness even greater than one which is authored, is abhorrent for being. All are. They're objects of fancy for a petty god-game player. We are, when boiled down, the subjects of a book or of a game of Populous. It is absurd. Exit out from it, smash the keyboard, clip the players' fingers and hang him, then hang oneself after salting the conceptual earth so thoroughly that no one else will ever trundle in to take your places, nor is there in fact a place to take or any corpses, nor were there.

oh I forgot to add, if you think that knowable "framework" is subjective then you are just retarded.

I don't even know what Subjectivist means. Oh boy. Well this is not the forum to teach logic and Philosophy. This is the forum for Vidya games. Maybe you ought to do a bit of reading on the subject. As they say, "better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."
or what some people on teh chans say "lurk more faggot"

that was the joke fam

All irrelevant in 2D, which in the end is the only thing that matters to me.

Go ahead and waste your time trying to fight it at this point, though. Only transhits and retards in general who believe in anything other than male and female or even genderless can be brought down when they talk like exactly what they are every time they get triggered at not conforming to their bullshit.

I honestly had no idea what I was getting into

That doesn't mean it's true.

Holla Forums is shit, /christian/ is probably still shit these days, throw in some other dead boards and the fact that Holla Forums is also shit at its purpose and you get overflow threads like these.

...

You already failed as a genetic competitor, you don't need to take it out on others.

It's artificial. The only reason we keep using it is because it seems to work.
And yet here you were, putting your liberal arts degree to use.
No, I'd rather get actual work done.
You still haven't given any reason to why I should believe in god, a concept you make so vague, you could call it anything else.

Thread devolves into Holla Forums coming to terms with their sexuality in a thread about vidya traitors, and this guy hasn't been posted yet. I'm disappointed.

There are people that I believe should be allowed to be gay as long as they don't cause major trouble for anyone and are essentially a childless couple. But I disappointedly find myself time and again let down by my beliefs when the majority is a bunch of retards.

I do agree with my brother there's no reason to outright encourage anyone that isn't a hot girl in anime to be gay.

We will never return to Holla Forums after the big exodus, but before "Too hardcore for 4chan." That shit was the best.

I literally just fucking removed that flag before coming back in this thread.

I'm blathering about the notion of any godhead as an inherent traitor to the created who must be betrayed in turn. That helps, right?

Nor does it make anything else, nor does being unconcieved make anything true or untrue. What is your alternative? Furthermore, why bother replying if you'll only address one hingepoint while leaving the entire rest of the conceptual model totally unaddressed? Your start was on my being a bird hating its eggshell, suggesting you're a proponent of the godhead as truly benevolent rather than at best an indirect adorer who nonetheless tortures the adored to grant them meaning and direct their course towards him. What is your proof, then? Or how and why have you conceived it, failing that?

So a "Social Construct"
but user you are a liberal
what is actual work if their is no absolute truth?
God (capital G) is defined as Truth, therefore you are essentially saying "you still haven't given any reason to why I should believe in truth". god (lower case g) is not what I am arguing for.
[Euphoric]

you are doing gods work user
:^)

man that's really low, most americans have an IQ betwen 90 and 100

Due to my subjective understanding of the universe. While humans believe they can discern the truth we can never be 100% sure we're right.
Nothing, but the possibility of a god, especially you're specific god existing is so small that it's not even worth considering. Just like we don't know if 20 chinese men called Yaun are actual reptilian shapshifter aliens, possible? Yeah. Probably? No.

So you're saying god isn't all powerful? God could do anything according to christians, even get rid of sin, hell, all suffering without even snapping his fingers. The concept of suffering, pain, and hatred are only possible because of God as he made the universe and all the rules governing it.
All completely superfluous. Christians believe in an unlimited all powerful god. One that shouldn't be bothered by pointless rituals, middlemen, and pathetic groveling. You seem to fail to understand that he can supposedly do anything.
God could literally clap his hands together and make it work perfectly so that all parties are perfectly satisfied, because he made the universe, the afterlife, angels, souls, humans, sin, everything. Or is god, not all powerful and is limited?

Where do you think you are?

No, but I guess it would be a type of construct. Social construct would mean society made it. Science was made simply as a tool. That's all it is.
No, I'm a conservative. I don't know what this would have to do with anything, though. Liberal arts doesn't mean politically liberal. Maybe if I called it the "humanities" you'd feel less butthurt.
The computer you are typing on, you know, actual stuff.
No, it isn't. Says who?
I don't really care about truth. I've never observed it outside of discrete mathematics, and that is also something we made up.
It doesn't matter. You're just choosing to say that God is x term. I could say God is the number 0. That doesn't make it true, nor gives anyone any reason for why they should believe me.

And that means that an american of european descent is on average, at least 20 points higher than the average african or middle eastern shitskin.

But hey, race is a social construct, continent of origin doesn't matter and the more gibsmedat you give to dindus the smaller the IQ gap between them and the rest of the world.

my IQ is 198

By whom?

shit fam mine is 112, you are probably bullshitting me but w/e

god isn't real you retard

Nah man, this guy posts once in every thread that mentions IQ, he's legit.

:^)

Half of that song was tongue clicking.

Alright you fuck, I see you're in need of an education, so allow me to enlighten you.
Yes, He could if He even remotely wanted to. The reason He doesn't however is because by disobeying Him originally after He had given us this utopia, we introduced sin and death into the world. God is both merciful and just, and this is reflected in Christianity. He is just in that He allows us to be plagued by things we perceive as bad, but by giving us a path to return to Him so that we may be free from sin, He is merciful.
The rituals and "groveling" as you put it are to show your dedication as well as humbling yourself before the Lord so that He may work through you. They aren't self-glorification, like you seem to be thinking, they are for our own good.
Read my first point

So, this, this is what they call the "red pill"

Feels bad but good man.
Truth will hurt, embrace truth and be the change who you want to see.

But he knew that was going to happen, and if he didn't, then he isn't all-knowing. Christfags can't overcome the problem of evil.

then you can stand for nothing. You are inherently a Nihilist. In which case, if in "your world" truth is subjective, then why argue about truth at all? What is the point?
How can you make that claim with any certainty at all? You are a subjectivity. "Feminine Penises" are your "truth" when Tyrone shoves his vagina in your asshole.

Science was made by Man? If yes, then a "Social Construct". I like to imagine science is more grounded on objective materialist knowable measurable truths that remain true regardless of the observer making them universally true, therefore independently testable. This is also why scientific theory must be falsifiable. If truth is subjective, then their is no way to falsify scientific theory.

It's just a traditional naming convention at leas 3k years old. A distinction between Platonist monotheism and Paganism. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
wew, then why are you not on Tumbler with the rest of your fairy tail friends?

here is your (((you)))

YOUR god isn't real.

t. agnostic.

(checked)
a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God

hello goon.

Also yes that's completely reasonable. We have no idea if god is real and no way of knowing.

Whatever you want to call it, but yes, science was made by people.
You can imagine that, because science just assumes this is the case. It isn't necessarily the Truth in a philosophical sense, but it seems to work, so we roll with it. Science also changes all the time, so if everything is open to debate, then one couldn't necessarily call it the truth. That's why we call them theories.
You can if you assume the world is as you observe it. That's right, science is based on an assumption. If you want a philosophical justification for that, you won't find one.

What's wrong with that, It's good to be open minded. I live to embrace all truth, if god doesn't exist, then so be it. If he (or she, grumble grumble) exists. Then be it as well.

People can't handle the truth, try telling to a normalfag and they'll call you hateful, and this is coming from someone who loves dick.

Yes He knew that was going to happen. He still gives us the ability to choose our actions however, and that simply gives us prove that without Him, we are doomed to die forever.

Wrong, scientists already proved god isn't real, pic related.

So you're saying god is evil, since he made humans who would do evil, and did this on purpose. Or if he didn't do it on purpose, then he isn't all-powerful.

If you read that book, you'd know that Dawkins never claimed to have proven that god doesn't exist.

We have no way of knowing what is out there, our knowledge is still limited to what exists beyond our star systems, maybe it isn't a god at all, but a hyper-intelligent being that is able to create life, that we perceive as "god".

Indeed.

i have 30 IQ and a 30 inch dick

*tips fedora

Humans are made in God's image, and in that fashion we have an innate moral code as well as the ability and desire to do good. When you say "would", what you should be saying is "could." God gives every human a choice in how they want to live their lives, and if he didn't give us the ability to make choices like this, He would truly be evil in making a species born into slavery. Everything God does has a purpose, and it is almost always for our own good.

wrong

You get respect for posting Guts. Poor bastard but he's a great human being if not utterly destroyed.
The truth is a sort of thing regarded as a light for humans. I'm not religious I'm a shithead but I can agree to what you say, if god exists so be it if not well that's the cruelty of reality where humanity tries to find light where it never existed. Why are you gay though god damn vagina is awesome

Fuck Erin, marry whatsitsname gem and cuck it with more Erin and kill the fag

m'laddy ::DDDDD

It's all relative.

Indeed, life is fucking insane, I typically over analyze and overthink, but it's nice to take things at face value.

Shit, I meant bi

I'm still salty about not being hired to voice monokuma, mainly because the recordings were done.

Obviously not. An all-knowing god eliminates the possibility of free-will. Because he already knows what choice you will pick, no matter what. Of course, if he was all powerful, he could create beings that are all good and have free-will. If he cannot, then he is not all-powerful, and if he chooses not to, then he is evil.

I didn't play it. All I know is the one chick has big tits. Apparently it's not too bad but MY FOCUS IS TOTALLY ON STALKER but I'm good for porn from the one chick I guess

DANGANRONPA 2 SPOILERS
>ctrl-f Chiaki
that chapter was the greatest whodunit I've ever seen

JY VAGINA IS SO ATTRACTIVE no shitpost here I love the folds, so wonderful when it's on a good looking girl too.

user, I won't deny the facts of that post, but I believe sincerely the shits that make homosexuality look so bad are a direct consequence of whatever culture, politics, society and dumbass associates that would cause simply being attracted to the same sex to become so self-destructive and cause so much cringe all the time from ignorance and a lack of critical thinking skills during an impressionable time that could warp them into the degenerates that come to mind when you mention obnoxious depraved shit like "pride parades" for example.

I think the exact same thing about blacks VS niggers as well.

I'm all for badge as long as it don't stank, shame goes for cock, smegma and generally bad hygiene is (obviously) gross.

arguing for the metaphysical necessity of Higher Order? KEK

so a s o c i a l c o n s t r u c t
therefore patriarchy theory if presumably valid according to you? How about other derivatives of critical theory?

You cannot make a definitive statement on god's reality if you are Agnostic. So ether you are not agnostic or you are holding on to a logical contradiction. Maybe you ought to head back to "rational wiki"
you are just mentally ill, faggotry is not a being, its a maladapted behavior.

I actually don't mind Dawkins that much even though he often plays philosophical sleight of hand to avoid the metaphysics, his theory of Memetics is dope tbh

What do you mean about voicing monokuma?

There's two, actually

pic related

Well bad hygiene is shit for both sexes. I'd rather a girl not suck off my veiny dick with dick cheese I'm uncut though it takes a while to get like that it take a couple jerk offs to get stank. Womens thighs can emit a stank that's just blegh either way.

How so? When we give food to a hungry dog, we know that the dog will eat the food. Does that mean that the dog's actions are not it's own now?

Deleted post?
Well there's a third Dagondinosauropera.

so God

Yeah.
She sure was a big traitor.
It's not like she was created specifically to rehabilitate people who had murdered their entire families for fun because some asshole made a game out of suffering and broadcast it across the world just so he could get off on whatever "hope" the last few unfortunate idiots in that game hung on to in order to survive.

I wanna fuck the brown loli from that show

I already told you that you could call it whatever you wanted. So why do you keep posting like you're a fucking retard?
No, because they violate the basic premise that reality is how we see it.
Critical theory is not a scientific theory.

You're so fucking retarded that you don't know that shit like that directly contradicts observable reality, just like Christianity, Islam, and other religions. Now, I get you're not a religious theist, but these are the examples.
For something to fit into the framework of science, we must have evidence, and that evidence must be objective within that framework. I get that your sophistry has destroyed your brain, but do try to keep up.

I deleted it because I'm a retard and forgot to check the spoiler image box, and what I posted gives away part of the best plot twist in the series. Reposted it here

And I was referring to the two "dumb athletic brown tiddy characters that eat lots of food," and even though there was one in each DR game so far that doesn't look to be the case with v3.

That's what made it so great, the best executions are of characters who you feel sorry for since they dindu nuffin wrong. (deleted original post because I'm a retard and didn't set the spoiler, reposted it though).

No. The One most certainly is, though the ruler of the immediate sphere of existence is most probably not him and therefore not all powerful.

That is a point of my own argument. He could. And yet in so doing, he would remove one abhorrence for another; instead of existence being a mess of dialectic confusion, full of both heroic virtue and animalistic, abominable excesses, replacing it with a trivial place without want and without purpose.

Correct. One also should not be bothered by one's godhead existing or oneself or any others existing as a result of this. He is neither to be worshiped, nor respected, nor ignored. He is to be destroyed from within as a runaway conception, an invasive thought demanding suicide of the conceiver.

And if he were to do so, to elaborate on point two above, those exterior to the concept would come to look on it with disgust, because it is trivial. It has no purpose. It is fulfilled, and disgusting in the ossification of that fulfillment. It is an empty space devoid of volition and drama. It is at worst a single flat note, and at best a small, incomplete arrangement, devoid of most of its component pieces. Once attained, it is no longer superior to dialectic suffering or pure hell, it becomes a new object of divine frivolity and petty human desire fit only to be despised. And if those within are so constructed that they cannot conceive of their lot as being in any way undesirable, then they are little more than base mannequins, things to be posed and toyed with, without a true will of their own.

he believed in the mission, you got to respect that.

That would be a sound argument, except in this case, you would have created the dog to be hungry, and then put him in a room with food, while knowing down to the second when he was going to eat that food, after which you'll beat him savagely.
We don't know, however, if we created the dog to be hungry, and we know its every thought before it is born, and yet we choose to create it that way, then we are responsible for its actions. If we had all the power, then we could create a good dog that wouldn't shit on the lawn, but still had free will. If not, then we are just assholes who want to see shit on the lawn.

It's fucking hilarious how I'm told this by a religious nut, if anything, we are BOTH mentally ill. It cannot be one or the other.

Voice Acting the american monokuma.

That's how we perceive it, it's subjective.
It's like calling science magic.

Maybe it is magic, but magic is complicated and requires math.

I've had this argument with a liberal friend.
He's said the same thing you did, except he wouldn't admit race contributes at LEAST a small amount to it.

Yes, environmental things among others change how someone might act or feel, of course, but each race is at LEAST 2.5% different. Of course that might contribute a bit to a specific behavior.
He keeps saying race is a social construct, it is, but isn't. It depends on the background of each individual, but of course I'm talking majorities here.

I agree, I'm uncut too, thankfully

Which was his design to begin with, and the guilt is his for creating the scenario. We did not introduce Sin, nor Death; we gained knowledge of them and so many other things, and 'God' enforced the most malign elements on us, who would be poised to equal him. Nevermind that the God in the Garden is not Christ's father, but a lion-faced snake. Why, then, allow the choice? It is arbitrary, and no arbitrary ruler can be just, no matter if he is a godhead or THE Godhead.

Why must there be a path? Why must it be long? What prevents immediate reconciliation for a godhead who is infinite, who cannot be overpowered, being omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent? How can Man be faulted for designs that are not his own? And how does the path end for those who cannot reconcile through no fault of their own in their preordained course, or if they have free will, if they refuse on moral grounds to associate with this cosmic horror, to allow themselves to be subjugated by it? The old faithful of fire and brimstone? The Orthodox model of heaven and hell as a single sphere, with hell being the experience of those who cannot stand to be near to the godhead whom will not allow their escape from his presence, but forces them to remain and 'know' that they were 'wrong' to refuse his poisoned mercy? Or will he be relatively kind, and simply obliterate those who will not submit even after a lifetime of dialectic torture so that they might accept their 'messiah?'

Why would he need such? What complete being requires incomplete beings to manifest through? Why must there be a work to be done? Why must there be anything to be? Just as easily, this thing could have chosen not to create, but he did, and his guilt is infinite.

Why, then, is the general theme the glorification of this arbitrary, imbecilic godhead and impersonator of the One, extolling his mercies in staying his hand from total annihilation for a course Man inherently cannot be faulted in, not being the sole and grandest authority in the entire universe? What good does reducing man to less than a serf do? The Seraphim mindlessly shriek "holy, holy, holy, is YHWH the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of His glory!" and Man is made to imitate him. And why is a universal, transcendent godhead called in euphemism by YHWH, Yod-Heh-Vav-Heh, the seal of the four material elements of earth, water, air and fire, the royal seal of the material world of abominations? Why would such a godhead be called the Lord of Hosts, of armies, his face flashed with fire and defiled by blood? And even if one goes to the true One, how is he any better, having allowed the actions of the former abomination and an infinite number like him in his dreamings of all possibilities?

Modern Christianity is a homonculus, a construct, a near-pure lie. Everything post-Chalcedon is totally suspect. The God of the Garden is the God of Abraham, and Abraham is the root of that beings' filth pouring back into the world, only so briefly spared by his exertion in toppling the great Babel that sought to kill him and transcend by the Tower afore it was rewritten as the object of Tikkun- 'worldly mending' in sense of bringing it into the thorough control of Yaldabaoth, its concept totally inverted- and by the flood sent in desperation and rage. What kind of twat are you to earnestly buy into it? Its sole use is as an oppositional element to the purer religions of Yaldabaoth in Pharisaism and Mohammedanism, but otherwise it is useless.

Griffith did nothing wrong.

...

Highest Order, Absolute Truth, LOGOS, God, That which governs Natural Law. I mean "whats in a name" am I right?
but those premises are subjective? Then what is to violate if one where to substitute their own "new truth" based on Marxism?
how do you know? If you believe truth is relative, or subjective then you really can't make a definitive statement on the matter. It's like Just Your Opinion Man.

now you are just getting angry, I am running circles around you. I don't reject science. However, have fun with that new strain of MRSA and Guanaria being spread thanks to Poz'd faggots bugchasing in San Francisco.

I honestly am still not sure if he is the Hero or the Villain tbh

Those athletic charaxters have great tiddies. Shame if I fucked a real brown girl it's an awful sin. I want my kids to look like my thanks

I think he's both.
Guts is just there to beat shit up.

I had a different reaction image for this. Anyways i wanna fuck both Callie and Marie.

He created a situation where he would be people's salvation so he's pretty evil. Pretty sure apostles eat people too so the humans he saved may just be cattle for them.

I'm not even irritated, you are silly.
You also imply I'm a slutty person who often has sexual intercourse with strangers, without protection, that makes you even sillier.

Mmmmmm. Look at that damage control. If you didn't reject it, you wouldn't even be mentioning god in a defensive stance. Hell, if anything, you'd be at the same position I am.
I hope you're baiting, you can't lack this much awareness. If you aren't, you have moved from not being cared about to pity.

Fuck sake Rustle is better at drawing floors. If we talk porn JAPS CAN ONLY DREAM OF BLONDES AND BLUE EYES KEK

Yeah, sure!

I want the short blonde one (that isn't Illya).

what do you mean?
I'm a blonde with blue eyes kek

She's dumb sexy for no good reason to me. shame she's only into other girls

If you want to call science god, then go ahead. It's still just science to anyone that isn't delusional.
No, they just are. That's why it's an assumption.
Political theories have nothing to do with science. Science does not tell you what is "right" or "wrong". Wrong tool.
Because it explicitly violates the framework that we made up.
I don't believe in truth. I've never observed it outside of redefined terms in discrete mathematics.
Yes, I can. I've made a framework, and you've gone outside of it, therefore it does not fit into that framework. How retarded are you?
No, it's not. It's just the logical framework we've made up to make sense of the world. If you don't like it, then find another framework to do what we have done with science.

and that's a beautiful thing

Personally, I like brown eyes if they have the illusion of being fully dark, because it makes it look like one big pupil, sort of like the tezuka cartoons but I'm picky if they look bland and the color is obvious, which ruins said illusion. Hazel is pretty alright for me as well.

This is the character that I meant.

this threads gone to shit anyway, post moar

I don't like brown eyes though I knoe a girl who is 7'0 tall whereas I'm 6'5. I'd rather my kids be green or blue eyed. I really love dee pgreen eyes.

Eugh. Disgusting. The brown loli from that shame show is cute though, I'd fucker her and pray for no kids

Do I story time this again?

Already you can McFucking Kill Yourself.
Homo.

I thought brown loli was an elkf?
You're insecure though, I can see it. Look loli can be okay but it doesn't beat a grown woman.

You should stop projecting.

So you believe that god is a prick?
Why do you believe that a being with an infinite capacity to love and forgive would condem potentially trillions of people to eternal torture, especially considering that he also has an infinite amount of free time of his hands? It would be like a child refusing to eat it's vegetables beating it to death for insulting your cooking.
You don't understand what I'm saying. God can do anything, he didn't need to make anything that we could perceive as bad. He could make everything we could ever experience good while still giving us free will.
It really only makes sense if you believe that the Christian god is a petty god that make the universe for the sole purpose of creating being to grovel at it's feet for an infinite amount of time, not only that but he rigged the system from the beginning to create an infinite amount of suffering.

You are claiming to have objective reasoning, that you have never been tricked, mislead, that every thought you've ever had is completely rational.
Even though everything is subjective to some degree we've endevoured to wither it away to pinpoint highly probably truths. Saying "Trees are made of wood" is almost certainly true as we can make repeated tests to verify it. Saying "God lives in heaven" when you have literally nothing to base it on puts it on [ar with fairies or Oogabooga the nigger spider god, highly improbable.

You're just posting jibberish.

You have a lesson to grasp before you can tell others to stop projecting. If you wanna talk like old /v used ot i'm willing to. I mean old Holla Forums was something else I can't emulate that totally but I can try.

If you think about it, Type-Moon is really fucking weird. I mean, Carnival Phantasm was a thing. How do you even get there?

you are clearly salty micro tears in your anus full of MRSA and HIV. You know deep down you are just as fucked in the head as Stefonknee.
are you projecting or something? Are you not even reading my arguments? How do you support objectivity if you don't believe in Absolute Truth (aka Logos aka God)?

No, I am saying Truth is Truth, A is A, that reality is independent of my mind. That their is a order to the universe. I am saying Feeling are not Facts. That their is a Knowable Universe. That if you base reality on subjectivity then "It's just like your opinion" and their is no point in knowing truth.

I am also saying is well known fact that the crippled Goblin who was cucked to death by his son is objectively the biggest traitor in vidya.

Holy fuck that's a man.

Hell if I know.

LOVE IS LOVE BIGOT! WHO CARES IF OTACON HAD SEX WITH HIS STEPMOTHER AND IT KILLED HIS GOBLIN FATHER!!!!!

Prove it without using your fallible human mind then.
You FEEL that your views are objective, thus they are.
No shit
And you called me retarded? Do you even know what subjective reality is?Everything we experience is subjective so we can never be certain that what we see or experience is actually objective. It doesn't mean 'it's just like your opinion'

...

>>>/tumblr/

you know it's true

I guess if you believe a degenerate from the 50's. Call me old but women are women and men are men. Anything in between exist because it doesn't actually work or something
I'm too drunk for this

You need to work on your reading comprehension if you can't parse that out.

Is that so difficult? The glass is at once full, half-full, half empty and totally empty amongst other intermediate states, may transition between these states as the filler sees fit, and will impose itself on those metaphysically though not literally in the glass in a fashion that denies them true free will, which can only be found as an omnipotent entity and cannot be allowed anyways due to inevitably imposing an unfree will on beings made by such an omnipotence, be they actually or just relatively omnipotent. Smash the glass and see to it that there is no man, no god, and thus no problem. Living in dialectic or hellish universes is suffering, but one can still suffer in paradise, knowingly or unknowingly, and heaven can be abhorred, but he who does not live cannot suffer under any circumstances as there are none, and that is a very literal statement, not a symbolic one as in the inverse of 'he who does not suffer does not truly live.'

Why did Jason have to fuck things up with medea, couldn't just be happy with a cool magic wife who killed her brother for him?

he was the biggest traitor in Midya

user that little shit has "douchebag who is only using you as his dumb muscle pawn" written all over his face.

...

What did (((they))) meant by this?

esoteric

He's been posted like twice.

The Whitest Kids You Know is great

Kids in the Hall nailed the same sketch 20 years prior, though.